Enteral administration of alectinib for ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer in an elderly patient: A case report.

RATIONALE: Alectinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) approved for use as first-line metastatic therapy for patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer. Certain medical conditions related to the tumor lesions may not allow oral administration of TKIs. PATIENT CONCERNS: We hereby report the case of a 90-year-old patient with anaplasic lymphoma kinase-rearranged lung cancer with severely impaired general condition and swallowing disorders. DIAGNOSIS: A thoracic computerized tomography (CT)-scan confirmed the presence of a mediastinal tumor lesion explaining the swallowing disorders secondary to recurrent paralysis. INTERVENTIONS: As no oral administration was feasible, alectinib was administered by percutaneous gastrostomy. OUTCOMES: The patient had few side-effects. He presented a major clinical and radiological response. After 2 months of treatment with alectinib, his mini-mental state examination had increased from 8/30 to 23/30. He had a 60% reduction in targeted pulmonary, bone and node lesions according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1). After 6 months of treatment, the patient's performance status had evolved from 3 to 1. This improvement in general condition made it possible to remove the feeding tube. LESSONS: In cases of lung cancer with oncogenic addiction, enteral administration of TKIs should be considered for elderly patients with an impaired general condition.

[Survival of breast cancers patients with meningeal carcinoma]. / Méningites carcinomateuses des cancers du sein.

PURPOSE: Among all solid tumors breast cancer is the most common cause of meningeal carcinomatosis (MC). The purpose of this study was to analyze clinical and biological responses as well as overall survival in MC patients (pts) of breast primary treated with intrathecal methotrexate (MTX). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Single-center retrospective series of MC pts treated between 2000 and 2007. Chemotherapy regimen was: MTX (15 mg/day; day 1-5) and depomedrol (40 mg, day 1) plus leucoverin (12 mg IV or 25 mg PO; day 1-5). Treatment cycles were repeated every 2 weeks. The survival was analyzed according to the characteristics of the tumor considering clinical and cytological response rates to treatment. RESULTS: The median survival was 4.5 months (range 0-53). In multivariate analysis, poor prognostic factors at diagnosis were: Performans status greater than 2 [P = 0.006, RR = 0.33 (0.15-0.71)], more than three chemotherapy regimens before MC diagnosis [P = 0.03, RR = 0.40 (0.19-0.93)], negative hormone receptor status [P = 0.02, RR = 0.4 (0.19-0.90)] and high Cyfra-21-1 level [P = 0.048, RR = 0.09-0.99]. The clinical progression after one cycle and the biological response after two cycles were independently correlated with OS [P<0.001, RR = 0.09 (0.02­0.37) and P = 0.003, RR = 3.6 (1.5­8.5), respectively]. A prognostic score designed to define three groups of patients is proposed. CONCLUSION: Although prognosis of patients with MC is poor, 1-year overall survival rate is 25%. The proposed prognostic score may be helpful in decision but warrants further assessment and validation in prospective trials.

Prognostic role of pregnancy occurring before or after treatment of early breast cancer patients aged <35 years: a GET(N)A Working Group analysis.

BACKGROUND: Usual practices recommend waiting at least 2 years between diagnosis of early breast cancer (EBC) and pregnancy. Few data highlighted a harmful effect of an early pregnancy for low-risk patients. The authors analyzed retrospectively data from women younger than 35 years who became pregnant before or after treatment of EBC. METHODS: Between 1990 and 1999, 908 consecutive EBC patients were analyzed. The primary endpoint was to compare overall survival (OS) between pregnant and nonpregnant patients. The secondary endpoint was to establish a score index laying down the risk of distant recurrence. RESULTS: Within the year before the diagnosis, 105 (11.6%) patients became pregnant and 118 (13%) were pregnant after treatment. In a multivariate model, a pregnancy before the diagnosis was not predictive of death but of local relapse. A pregnancy subsequent to breast cancer therapy resulted in a 77% decrease of death (P < .001). In good-prognosis score index patients, the annual risk of relapse remained low. In patients having the higher score, recurrences occurred mainly during the first years after the treatment. Beyond 80 months, the annual risk of relapse seemed to be similar to those of lower-risk subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: In women aged younger than 35 years, a pregnancy occurring before or after the diagnosis of breast cancer was not an independent prognostic factor of death. In the subset of patients having a high risk of relapse, it may be preferable to postpone a pregnancy beyond 5 years after the breast cancer therapy.

[Oxaliplatin and ovarian cancer]. / Oxaliplatine et cancers de l'ovaire.

Oxaliplatin was brought into clinical evaluation in ovarian cancer because of the in vitro and in vivo antitumor activity observed in experimental models resistant to cisplatin. As single agent at 130 mg/m2 every 3 weeks, the objective response rates rage from 16% to 29% in patients treated after failure of one or two regimens. As first line, in a randomized trial cyclophosphamide-cisplatin versus cyclophosphamide-oxaliplatine, no significant statistical differences were observed in efficacy parameters (response rate, progression free survival and overall survival). The toxicity profile seemed to favor the oxaliplatin arm. Many associations with other available active drugs as taxanes, gemcitabine and liposomal doxorubicin were performed with promising results.