Dual role of DNA methylation inside and outside of CTCF-binding regions in the transcriptional regulation of the telomerase hTERT gene.

Expression of hTERT is the major limiting factor for telomerase activity. We previously showed that methylation of the hTERT promoter is necessary for its transcription and that CTCF can repress hTERT transcription by binding to the first exon. In this study, we used electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) and chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) to show that CTCF does not bind the methylated first exon of hTERT. Treatment of telomerase-positive cells with 5-azadC led to a strong demethylation of hTERT 5'-regulatory region, reactivation of CTCF binding and downregulation of hTERT. Although complete hTERT promoter methylation was associated with full transcriptional repression, detailed mapping showed that, in telomerase-positive cells, not all the CpG sites were methylated, especially in the promoter region. Using a methylation cassette assay, selective demethylation of 110 bp within the core promoter significantly increased hTERT transcriptional activity. This study underlines the dual role of DNA methylation in hTERT transcriptional regulation. In our model, hTERT methylation prevents binding of the CTCF repressor, but partial hypomethylation of the core promoter is necessary for hTERT expression.

Pitfalls in TRAP assay in routine detection of malignancy in effusions.

Telomerase has been found to be reactivated in a majority of cancers but is inactive in most somatic cells. Our principal goal was to determine the potential use of the telomeric repeat amplification protocol (TRAP) assay as marker for malignancy in cytological effusions. The simple selection criterion was the cytological diagnosis, and routine samples were classified into malignant (58 samples) and nonmalignant (233 samples). Of the malignant samples, 44/58 (76%) were positive by TRAP assay. Of the 14 telomerase-negative cytology-positive samples, RNA integrity was poor in 9, indicating suboptimal sample conservation for molecular analysis. In 3 of the remaining 5 samples with a negative TRAP assay, a high number of malignant cells was observed, and these cells might have been telomerase-negative. Thus, the sensitivity of TRAP assay for the presence of malignant cells was about 76%. In the cytologically nonmalignant effusions, the presence of telomerase activity was observed in 24% (55/233). Of these, 6% were highly suspicious for malignancy, 9% were doubtful, and 9% were cytologically nonmalignant effusions confirmed by a follow-up of 12 mo or more. According to these data, the specificity of the TRAP assay to detect tumor cells in effusions ranged only between 82-91%. Our results indicate that, although the TRAP assay is positive in 6-15% of putative malignant effusions, the relatively high number of TRAP false-negative and false-positive cases renders this test unsuitable for routine diagnostic purposes.

Detection of malignant effusions: comparison of a telomerase assay and cytologic examination.

Telomerase is inactive in most somatic cells, but has been found to be reactivated in a majority of cancers. Our principal goal was to test whether the presence of telomerase activity concurred with positive cytology, and was thus of potential use in detecting cancer cells in effusions. The telomeric repeat amplification protocol (TRAP) assay and cytological examination were performed in a blinded fashion on 91 unselected effusions, for which laboratory processing was done according to standard procedures. In our series, 30% (27/91) of samples were found to be malignant by cytology. Of these, 19 (70%) were also positive in the TRAP assay. Of the 8 telomerase-negative cytology-positive samples, RNA integrity was generally poor, indicating suboptimal sample conservation for molecular analysis. Negative cytology in the presence of telomerase activity was observed in 17 effusions. Of these, 11 were from patients with advanced cancer, and thus a diagnosis of malignant effusion should be suspected. The TRAP assay for telomerase activity holds promise in the analysis of effusions, but its routine use as an adjunct to cytology awaits further confirmation of its positive predictive value.

Human release factor eRF1: structural organisation of the unique functional gene on chromosome 5 and of the three processed pseudogenes.

In lower and higher eukaryotes, a family of tightly related proteins designated eRF1 (for eukaryotic release factor 1) catalyses termination of protein synthesis at all three stop codons. The human genome contains four eRF1 homologous sequences localised on chromosomes 5, 6, 7 and X. We report here the cloning and the structural analysis of the human eRF1 gene family. It appears that the gene located on chromosome 5 alone is potentially functional, whereas the other three sequences resemble processed pseudogenes. This is the first description of the structural organisation of the human eRF1 gene, which has been remarkably conserved during evolution and which is essential in the translation termination process.