ABSTRACT
Strategies that individualize the care of cancer patients receiving oral anticancer agents offer opportunities to improve treatment adherence and patient care. However, the impact of digital remote monitoring systems in this setting has not been evaluated. Here, we report the results of a phase 3 trial (CAPRI, NCT02828462) to assess the impact of a nurse navigator-led program on treatment delivery for patients with metastatic cancer. Patients receiving approved oral anticancer agents were randomized (1:1) to an intervention combining a nurse navigator-led follow-up system and a web portal-smartphone application on top of usual care, or to usual symptom monitoring at the discretion of the treating oncologist, for a duration of 6 months. The primary objective included optimization of the treatment dose. Secondary objectives were grade ≥3 toxicities, patient experience, rates and duration of hospitalization, response and survival, and quality of life. In 559 evaluable patients the relative dose intensity was higher in the experimental arm (93.4% versus 89.4%, P = 0.04). The intervention improved the patient experience (Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care score, 2.94 versus 2.67, P = 0.01), reduced the days of hospitalization (2.82 versus 4.44 days, P = 0.02), and decreased treatment-related grade ≥3 toxicities (27.6% versus 36.9%, P = 0.02). These findings show that patient-centered care through remote monitoring of symptoms and treatment may improve patient outcomes and experience.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents , Neoplasms , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Chronic Disease , Hospitalization , Humans , Neoplasms/therapy , Quality of LifeABSTRACT
The Ethics committee of Gustave Roussy cancer center is devoted to both reflection and action. The group has 40 members, professionals, patients and outside experts. These meet in plenary meetings or in specific working sessions and intervene at the request of any professional faced with ethical questions in the care. This Ethics Committee has voluntarily a double vocation: on one hand, a reflective group on major issues of ethics in health and its involvement in hospital life; on the other hand, a working group embedded in the daily lives of the care. The themes addressed at the meetings (plenary sessions, annual meetings) include shared-decision making, advance directives, refusal of care, religious aspects, or biomedical research Daily activity centered on the care revolves around several times a week meetings, in various services, "Supportive Collegial Meetings" such as proposed in the 3rd French Cancer Plan; these include nursing staff members, oncologists, intensive and palliative care specialists, psychologist, around difficult medical and/or ethical situations. In case of situation requiring an urgent discussion, a referral to the Ethics Committee brings together within 24hours four to five members of the Committee and the care team. Moreover, the Ethics Committee helped develop Aid to Decision making Form upon care gradation for hospitalized cancer patients. Through these interventions on a daily basis, assistance of professionals, reflexive vocation or even delivery of training, the Ethics Committee contributes to an acculturation around anticipation and collegiality in the care. Its double polarity aims to reconcile "philosophical time' for the ethics process, and the connection with the routine issues raised by patients, their families and caregivers.
