ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To study the effect of the surgical repair (isthmorraphy) of the large scar dehiscence after cesarean on symptoms and fertility for women who desire pregnancy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, 14 symptomatic patients, who desire a new pregnancy underwent a surgical repair by laparotomy, laparoscopic or vaginal technique. Five women experienced failure of Assistance Reproductive Technique (IVF or ICSI) for idiopathic secondary infertility. The dehiscent scars were evaluated by ultrasound, hysterography, hysteroscopy and magnetic resonance imaging. OUTCOME: Symptoms improvement was found in 92% of case. Ten pregnancy (71%) was obtained after surgical repair, 6 spontaneous and 4 after Assistance Reproductive Technique. Among the 5 women initially followed in the reproductive unit, 4 became pregnant, 3 after IVF or ICSI and 1 spontaneous. No operative complication occurred. The subsequent pregnancy was unremarkable with no uterine rupture. DISCUSSION: Large scar defect after cesarean can take shape of a complete absent of the anterior wall of the uterus. No incident has been proved in this condition. There is a lack of data concerning these isthmocele. The experience of hysteroscopic repair cannot be applied to these real large diverticule of the scar cesarean. The results of this study suggest a link between the isthmocele and reversible symptoms after surgery. The first results concerning the subsequent fertility after surgical repair seem interesting CONCLUSION: When a large scare defect (isthmocele) is found in symptomatic woman (pelvic pain, bleeding uterine, infertility), a surgical repair can be proposed, especially for woman who desire a new pregnancy.
Subject(s)
Cesarean Section/adverse effects , Cicatrix/surgery , Infertility, Female/therapy , Uterus/pathology , Uterus/surgery , Adult , Cicatrix/diagnosis , Female , Humans , Pelvic Pain , Pregnancy , Retrospective Studies , Uterine HemorrhageABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To compare the morbidity, functional results and quality of life after laparoscopic promontofixation for the cure of genital prolapsed according with the type of fixation of the posterior mesh. PATIENTS AND METHOD: From 2001 to 2009, 89 patients with genital prolapse of grade greater than or equal to 2 (POP-Q classification) were operated on by laparoscopy including 47 patients with the suture of the posterior mesh (group suture) and 39 patients with staplin (group staples). Complications per- and postoperative were assessed. Quality of life was evaluated using the questionnaires Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI 20), Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PISQ 7) and Pelvic Organ Prolaps/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ 12). RESULTS: Except for the mean parity that was higher in the group staples, no difference was found between the groups in the mean age, prior surgery, and genital prolapsed stage. Operating time was shorter in the group staples (P=0.005). No difference was found between the groups in the rate of intra- and postoperative complications. Hospital stay was shorter for the group staples (P=0.007). No difference between the groups was found in de novo symptoms, as well as in the improvement of quality of life. CONCLUSION: Our results support that stapling of the posterior mesh for the laparoscopic promontofixation is associated with decrease in operating time and hospital stay compared to the suture without affecting functional results and quality of life.
Subject(s)
Gynecologic Surgical Procedures , Pelvic Organ Prolapse/surgery , Surgical Mesh , Suture Techniques , Sutures , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Laparoscopy/methods , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Quality of Life , Retrospective Studies , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility and morbidity of laparoscopic promontofixation in the cure of genital prolapse. PATIENTS AND METHOD: From March 2001 to January 2009, 101 patients with genital prolapse of grade greater than or equal to 2 (POPQ classification) were operated by laparoscopy. Complications per and postoperative as well as patient satisfaction were assessed. Quality of life was evaluated using the questionnaires Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI 20), Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PISQ 7) and Pelvic Organ Prolaps/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ 12). RESULTS: The mean operative time was 196 min including the time for hysterectomy done in 83% of cases. The peroperative complication rate was 7% including two bladder and one rectal injuries and 4% of laparoconversion. The postoperative complication rate was 16% corresponding to 3/4 of retention of urine. Two pelvic hematomas were observed. The distance complication rate was 3% corresponding to a vaginal erosion, a spondylodiscitis and a case of persistent pelvic pain requiring removal of material. With a mean follow-up of 30.7 months, 81% patients declared themselves satisfied with the intervention. In intention to treat, the satisfaction rate was only 67.3%. A significant improvement in quality of life was observed using the questionnaire PFDI 20 (p < 0.0001), PFIQ 7 (p < 0.0001) et PISQ 12 (p < 0.001). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Our results confirm the feasibility of the laparoscopic promontofixation with a quality of life improvement but also highlights the existence of significant morbidity requiring further trials for the choice of surgical approach for the treatment of genital prolapse.
Subject(s)
Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/methods , Laparoscopy/methods , Pelvic Organ Prolapse/surgery , Adult , Aged , Female , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Humans , Intraoperative Complications/epidemiology , Laparoscopy/adverse effects , Middle Aged , Patient Satisfaction , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Quality of Life , Rectum/injuries , Risk Factors , Urinary Bladder/injuriesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: The use of sentinel node biopsy (SNB) has replaced axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) as the new standard of care in early unifocal breast cancer. In multifocal breast cancer, this procedure remains controversial. The real problem is when a multifocal tumor is discovered during or after the surgery, with a SNB negative which has been already done. Should we do an additional ALND or not? PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of 43 multifocal breast cancer patients who underwent SNB. RESULTS: The mean histological primary tumor size was 16.8 mm (range, 1-52 mm). The mean number of SN removed was 2.07 (range, 1 to 5). Sixteen (34.1%) of the 43 patients had at least one positive SN. Twenty-seven patients had subsequent axillary dissection. Negative predictive value of SN procedure was 100% (95% confidence interval: 87.1-100%) with a FN rate of 0%. Moreover, not any patient has developed axillary recurrence with a mean follow-up of 20.8 months (1-77). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Our data are not powerful enough to validate the SNB in multifocal breast tumor discovered after an initial surgery. However, the FN rate of 0% is encouraging and prospective studies with a systematic ALND can help surgeons to respond to the question.
