Allergic fungal rhinosinusitis and eosinophilic mucin chronic rhinosinusitis: Differential diagnostic criteria. A two-center comparative study following STROBE methodology.

OBJECTIVES: Allergic fungal rhinosinusitis (AFRS) and eosinophilic mucin chronic rhinosinusitis (EMRS) are two forms of chronic sinusitis distinguished by the presence (AFRS) or absence (EMRS) of fungal elements in sinus mucin. Detection of the fungal elements, however, is complex and it is difficult to say whether EMRS is in fact an entity distinct from AFRS. The aim of the present study, based on a retrospective series of AFRS and EMRS, was to identify the specific clinical and radiological elements distinguishing between the two. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 2-center retrospective observational study following STROBE guidelines included patients managed for AFRS or EMRS between 2009 and 2022. Clinical, mycological, pathologic and radiological data were collected. Type of treatment and disease progression were also analyzed. Intergroup comparison used Student's test for mean values of quantitative variables, with calculation of P-values, and Pearson's Chi2 test or Fisher's exact test for categoric variables, with calculation of relative risk and 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: The AFRS group comprised 41 patients and the EMRS group 34. Demographic data were comparable between groups. EMRS showed a higher rate of asthma (79.4 vs. 31.4%; P<0.001), more severe nasal symptomatology (rhinorrhea, P=0.01; nasal obstruction, P=0.001), and more frequent bilateral involvement (85.3 vs. 58.5%; P=0.021). AFRS showed more frequent complications (19 vs. 0%; P=0.006). Radiologically, mucin accumulation was greater in AFRS, filling the sinus in 84.2% of cases, versus 26.3% (P<0.001), with more frequent sinus wall erosion (19 vs. 5.8%; P=0.073). The recurrence rate was higher in EMRS: 38.2 vs.21.9% (P=0.087). CONCLUSION: The present retrospective study found a difference in clinical and radiological presentation between AFRS and EMRS, with EMRS more resembling the presentation of severe nasal polyposis.

The Epidermal Growth Factor Domain of the Mutation Does Not Appear to Influence Disease Progression in CADASIL When Brain Volume and Sex Are Taken into Account.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: By studying the evolution of brain volume across the life span in male and female patients, we aimed to understand how sex, brain volume, and the epidermal growth factor repeat domain of the mutation, the 3 major determinants of disability in CADASIL, interact in driving disease evolution. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used validated methods to model the evolution of normalized brain volume with age in male and female patients using nonparametric regression in a large, monocentric cohort with prospectively collected clinical and high-resolution MR imaging data. We used k-means clustering to test for the presence of different clinical course profiles. RESULTS: We included 229 patients (mean age, 53 [SD, 12] years; 130 women). Brain volume was larger in women (mean size, 1024 [SD, 62] cm3 versus 979 [SD, 50] cm3; P < .001) and decreased regularly. In men, the relationship between brain volume and age unexpectedly suggested an increase in brain volume around midlife. Cluster analyses showed that this finding was related to the presence of a group of older male patients with milder symptoms and larger brain volumes, similar to findings of age-matched women. This group did not show specific epidermal growth factor repeat domain distribution. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate a detrimental effect of male sex on brain volume throughout life in CADASIL. We identified a subgroup of male patients whose brain volume and clinical outcomes were similar to those of age-matched women. They did not have a specific distribution of the epidermal growth factor repeat domain, suggesting that yet-unidentified predictors may interact with sex and brain volume in driving disease evolution.