Laryngeal cancer treatment and survival differences across regional cancer centres in Ontario, Canada.

AIMS: We conducted a population-based study of practice patterns and outcome across the regional cancer centres providing care to patients with laryngeal cancer in the Province of Ontario, Canada. MATERIALS AND METHODS: : This was a retrospective cohort study of 1547 patients with cancers of the glottic or supraglottic larynx diagnosed between 1982 and 1995. Data were collected via chart review, including: patient and disease characteristics, treatment, waiting times and treatment volumes. Vital status was obtained from the Ontario Cancer Registry. Variations across the nine regional cancer centres are described and their effect on outcome explored. All analyses were stratified by stage I and II separately from stage III and IV. RESULTS: Treatments differed across centres (P<0.0001); for instance, in the stage I and II group, use of a daily dose of >2.54Gy varied from 0 to 87.6% and in the stage III and IV group, total laryngectomy rates varied from a low of 6% to a high of 53%. The percentage of patients waiting more than 6 weeks from diagnosis to first treatment varied from 17 to 49% (P<0.0001). Multivariate analysis revealed cause-specific survival differences that were not explained by control for case mix, treatment or waiting times. Differences ranged from an 82% risk reduction in one centre compared with the reference (stage I and II group, P=0.008) to a 153% increase in risk (stage III and IV group, P=0.02). Centre case volumes were not associated with cause-specific survival. CONCLUSIONS: This study quantifies the degree of variation that can occur in the treatment and outcome of people with cancer. We cannot properly assess whether care delivery is of high quality until we have a better understanding of the factors that drive such variations.

Explaining socioeconomic status effects in laryngeal cancer.

INTRODUCTION: People with lower socioeconomic status (SES) experience shorter survival times after a cancer diagnosis for many disease sites. We determined whether area-level SES was associated with the outcomes: cause-specific survival and local-regional failure in laryngeal cancer in Ontario, Canada. When we found an association we sought explanations that might be related to access to care including age, sex, rural residence, tumor stage, lymph node status, use of diagnostic imaging, treatment type, percentage of prescribed radiotherapy delivered, number of radiotherapy interruption days, treatment waiting time, and treating cancer center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study population consisted of 661 glottic and 495 supraglottic stage-stratified randomly-sampled patients identified using the Ontario Cancer Registry. Area-level SES quintiles were assigned using adjusted median household income from the Canadian Census. Other data were collected from patient charts. Explanations for SES effects were determined by measuring whether the effect moved toward the null value by at least 10% when an access indicator was added to a the model. RESULTS: Socioeconomic status was not related to either outcome for those with supraglottic cancer, but an association was present in glottic cancer. With the highest socioeconomic status quintile as the referent group, the relative risks for patients in the lowest socioeconomic quintile were 2.75 (95% CI 1.48, 5.12) for cause-specific survival and 1.90 (95% CI 1.24, 2.93) for local-regional failure. Disease stage as measured by T-category explained between 3% and 23% of these socioeconomic effects. None of the other access indicators met our 10% change criterion. CONCLUSION: We question why people in lower socioeconomic quintiles were not diagnosed earlier in the disease progression. Having ruled out several variables that may be related to access to care, additional biologic and social variables should be examined to further understand socioeconomic status effects.

Enhancement of radiation sensitivity with BH3I-1 in non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Anti-apoptotic proteins, such as Bcl-2 and Bcl-xL, are frequently over-expressed in human malignancies, and this is correlated with resistance to chemotherapeutic drugs and gamma- radiation. Recently identified small organic molecules capable of inhibiting Bcl-2 and/or Bcl-xL function, may enhance radiation sensitivity of cancer cells in which they are over expressed. We examined whether specific blockade of the BH3-domain binding to Bcl-xL could sensitize cancer cells to gamma- radiation. METHODS: Human non-small-cell lung cancer H460 cells with wild-type p53 and H1792 cells with mutant p53 were exposed to various doses of radiation and/or BH3I-1 and for different points of time to BH3I-1 treatment. XTT and clonogenic survival assays were used to evaluate the growth-inhibitory effects of the antagonist BH3I-1, ionizing radiation or both. Western blot analysis was used to examine the cellular effect of the expression of Bcl-xL, Bax, and p53. Apoptosis and cell cycle distribution were analyzed by confocal microscopy with Hoechst 33258 staining and cytochrome c, and flow cytometry, respectively. RESULTS: BH3I-1 appeared to induce a dose- and time-dependent apoptosis in H460 and H1792 cells, regardless of p53 status. After 2 days of BH3I-1 treatment, the cells that remained attached were exposed to ionizing radiation. Followed by clonogenic assay, BH3I-1 treatment enhanced the radiation sensitivity of H1792 surviving cells with mutant p53, but not in H460 cells with wild-type p53. A transient time-dependent cell cycle blockade at G2-M phase was identified for H1792 cells without subsequent modification of cell cycle distribution. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest a potential role for the small molecule inhibitor as a novel radiation sensitizer in non-small cell lung cancer.

Abbreviated course of radiation therapy in older patients with glioblastoma multiforme: a prospective randomized clinical trial.

PURPOSE: To prospectively compare standard radiation therapy (RT) with an abbreviated course of RT in older patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred patients with GBM, age 60 years or older, were randomly assigned after surgery to receive either standard RT (60 Gy in 30 fractions over 6 weeks) or a shorter course of RT (40 Gy in 15 fractions over 3 weeks). The primary end point was overall survival. The secondary end points were proportionate survival at 6 months, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and corticosteroid requirement. HRQoL was assessed using the Karnofsky performance status (KPS) and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Brain (FACT-Br). RESULTS: All patients had died at the time of analysis. Overall survival times measured from randomization were similar at 5.1 months for standard RT versus 5.6 months for the shorter course (log-rank test, P =.57). The survival probabilities at 6 months were also similar at 44.7% for standard RT versus 41.7% for the shorter course (lower-bound 95% CI, -13.7). KPS scores varied markedly but were not significantly different between the two groups (Wilcoxon test, P =.63). Low completion rates of the FACT-Br (45%) precluded meaningful comparisons between the two groups. Of patients completing RT as planned, 49% of patients (standard RT) versus 23% required an increase in posttreatment corticosteroid dosage (chi(2) test, P =.02). CONCLUSION: There is no difference in survival between patients receiving standard RT or short-course RT. In view of the similar KPS scores, decreased increment in corticosteroid requirement, and reduced treatment time, the abbreviated course of RT seems to be a reasonable treatment option for older patients with GBM.

Radiotherapy patterns of practice: T1N0 glottic cancer in Ontario, Canada.

AIMS: To describe the variation in the delivery of radiation therapy to patients with T1N0 glottic cancer who were diagnosed in Ontario, Canada, between 1982 and 1995. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The patient population consisted of a random sample of 461 patients treated with curative intent from the nine cancer centres that administer radiation therapy in the province. Abstracted variables included prescribed dose (Gy) and fractionation (f), beam energy and arrangement, set-up, field size, beam modifiers, positioning and treatment interruptions. RESULTS: Thirteen prescribed dose-fractionation schemes (> or = four cases each) were identified, including 50.0-53.0 Gy/20 f (54.5%), 55.0-61.0 Gy/25 f (30.3%), and 60.0-66.0 Gy/30-33 f (7.7%). All regimens used one fraction per day, 5 days per week. An isocentric set-up was used (94.3%), with megavoltage (MV) beam energies of Cobalt-60 (87.9%), 6 MV (6.1%) and 4 MV (6.1%). A lateral parallel-opposed pair of beams was the predominant technique (76.4%) versus an anterior oblique pair (17.2%) or angle-down pair (caudally directed fields to achieve shoulder clearance, 5.7%). Wedging (96.3%) and bolus (11.8%) were used as beam-modifying devices. Predominant field-width dimensions were 5.0-6.0 cm (43.4%) and 6.5-7.0 cm (43.1%), and field length dimensions were 5.0-6.0 cm (49.5%) and 6.5-7.0 cm (35.0%). Head, neck or chin immobilisation was used in 86.9% of the cases, with 94.6% of these being custom-made. We found that radiotherapy practice was stable over time, except for a trend of increasing field size and increasing use of immobilisation. In contrast, we found practice variations among the province's cancer centres. On the basis of our findings, we defined a predominant technical practice consisting of Cobalt-60 (reflecting machine availability during the period of the study), an isocentric set-up, a lateral parallel-opposed pair technique with wedging, and supine-head neutral positioning with custom immobilisation. Forty-two per cent of the cases had one or more components of treatment that differed from this definition. CONCLUSIONS: Description of practice variation can provoke discussion about unrecognised differences in practice policies, perhaps identifying the need for better evidence, treatment guidelines, or both.

The role of computed tomography in the T classification of laryngeal carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The objectives of this study were 1) to describe patterns of use of computed tomography (CT) in laryngeal carcinoma, and 2) to characterize the contribution of CT to the T classification of laryngeal carcinoma. METHODS: The study population comprised 1195 patients with laryngeal carcinoma diagnosed from 1982 through 1995 chosen randomly from the Ontario provincial cancer registry. A chart review was conducted to obtain data on each case. Patient-related, tumor-related, and health-system-related factors were analyzed to identify factors associated with the use of CT. Descriptions of clinical exams and CT reports were reviewed to see how CT information modified T classification. Actuarial local control and cause specific survival curves were plotted by clinical T classification without and with CT to evaluate stage migration. The percentage of the variance in outcome explained by T classification in a Cox analysis was used to evaluate whether the prognostic accuracy of T classification was improved with the use of information from CT. RESULTS: Patients with glottic (20.1%) and supraglottic (41.7%) carcinoma underwent CT. The use of CT increased over time in glottic and supraglottic carcinoma combined from 17.2% in 1982-5 to 33.9% in 1991-5. Computed tomography was used less often in older patients with a 16% (95% confidence interval, 5-27%) decrease in the odds of having CT with each 10-year age increment. Computed tomography use varied considerably across the cancer center regions in Ontario. Computed tomography altered the T classification in 20.2% of those patients who had CT, with most being "upstages." Stage migration due to CT was demonstrated. Using information from CT in the assignment of T classification for 27.8% of this study population did not make a significant contribution to the ability of T classification to predict outcome over the entire group. CONCLUSIONS: There is large variation in the use of CT among different age groups and regions. The ability to compare outcomes by stage across geographic areas is compromised when the use of CT varies.

Glottic cancer in Ontario, Canada and the SEER areas of the United States. Do different management philosophies produce different outcome profiles?

We compared the management and outcome of glottic cancer in Ontario, Canada to that in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Program areas in the United States to determine whether the greater use of primary radiotherapy with surgery reserved for salvage in Ontario was associated with similar survival and better larynx retention rates than the U.S. approach where primary surgery is used more often. Electronic, clinical and hospital data were linked to cancer registry data and supplemented by chart review where necessary. Initial treatment and survival in patients diagnosed in the SEER areas from 1988 through 1994 were compared to patients from Ontario diagnosed from 1982 through 1995. Actuarial laryngectomy rates were compared for patients over 65 at diagnosis in the two regions. Analyses were conducted over all cases and stratified by disease stage. In localized disease (T1 or T2), conservative treatment was the most common initial treatment in both regions, although total laryngectomy was used more often in SEER than Ontario (6.2% vs. 0.2%, respectively, P <.001). In advanced disease (T3 or T4), total laryngectomy was more commonly used as initial treatment in SEER (62.9% vs. 21.0% in Ontario, P < or =.001). Over all cases, the relative survival rate was 80% in Ontario at 5 years compared to 78% in SEER (P =.33). In localized disease, the relative survival rates were 4 to 5% higher in Ontario from the second year on, while in advanced disease 2 to 3% higher rates in SEER did not approach statistical significance. Actuarial laryngectomy rates at 3 years differed between the two regions, with a 4% higher rate in SEER (P =.01). In localized disease, 12.6% of Ontario patients had a laryngectomy by 3 years postdiagnosis compared to 17.9% in SEER (P =.05). In advanced disease, the rates were 63.3% and 79.2%, respectively (P =.07). There are large differences in the management of glottic cancer between the SEER areas of the U.S. and Ontario and no evidence that a policy emphasizing radiotherapy with surgery reserved for salvage is associated with worse survival. Ultimate laryngectomy rates are lower in Ontario for localized disease and may be lower for advanced disease. Conservation treatment should be used for localized disease while the treatment decision in advanced disease may be especially sensitive to patient values for voice retention versus initial cure.

Dexamethasone for the prophylaxis of radiation-induced emesis: a National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group phase III study.

PURPOSE: To investigate the efficacy of dexamethasone as a prophylactic antiemetic for patients receiving fractionated radiotherapy to the upper abdomen in a randomized controlled trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred fifty-four patients planned to receive fractionated radiotherapy to fields involving the upper abdomen (minimum total dose, 20 Gy; minimum number of fractions, five) were randomized to receive prophylactic dexamethasone (2 mg orally three times a day [tid], starting in the morning of first treatment and continuing until after their fifth treatment) or placebo. The primary end point of the study was the proportion of patients free from emesis during the study period. Secondary end points included a quality-of-life assessment using the core questionnaire of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer and side effects of dexamethasone therapy in this population of patients. RESULTS: Fifty-four (70%) out of 75 patients receiving dexamethasone had complete protection versus 37 (49%) out of 75 patients on placebo (P = .025). Most emetic episodes occurred during the initial phase of treatment. Although there was no difference in global quality of life between the two sets of patients, patients receiving dexamethasone had less nausea and vomiting and less loss of appetite but more insomnia. CONCLUSION: Dexamethasone 2 mg tid seems to be an effective prophylactic antiemetic in this situation. Side effects were acceptable, but there seemed to be no overall effect on global quality of life.

A randomized trial of a nonabsorbable antibiotic lozenge given to alleviate radiation-induced mucositis.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to determine whether a nonabsorbable antibiotic lozenge could alleviate radiation-induced oral mucositis. METHODS: Patients scheduled to receive radiation therapy to more than one-third of the oral cavity mucosa were selected for the study. After stratification, patients were randomized to receive either a nonabsorbable antibiotic lozenge or a placebo. Both groups were then evaluated for mucositis by health care providers and self-report instruments. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients were randomized to receive the antibiotic lozenge and 58 to receive the placebo. There were no substantial differences or trends in mucositis scores between the two study arms as measured by the health care providers. However, the mean patient-reported mucositis score and the duration of patient-reported Grade 3-4 mucositis were both lower in the patients randomized to the antibiotic lozenge arm (P = 0.02 and 0.007, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This prospective, controlled trial provides evidence to suggest that a nonabsorbable antibiotic lozenge can decrease patient-reported radiation-induced oral mucositis to a modest degree. Nonetheless, this evidence does not appear to be compelling enough to recommend this treatment as part of standard practice.

Randomized trial of a chlorhexidine mouthwash for alleviation of radiation-induced mucositis.

PURPOSE: To determine whether a chlorhexidine mouthwash could alleviate radiation-induced oral mucositis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients scheduled to receive radiation therapy to include greater than one third of the oral cavity mucosa were selected for study. Following stratification, they were randomized in a double-blind manner to receive a chlorhexidine mouthwash or a placebo mouthwash. Both groups were then similarly evaluated for mucositis and mouthwash toxicity. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were randomized to receive the chlorhexidine mouthwash, while 27 received the placebo mouthwash. Treatment arms were well balanced. There was a trend for more mucositis and there was substantially more toxicity (eg, mouthwash-induced discomfort, taste alteration, and teeth staining) on the chlorhexidine arm. CONCLUSION: In contrast to the prestudy hypothesis that a chlorhexidine mouthwash might provide benefit for patients receiving radiation therapy to the oral mucosa, this study provides strong evidence suggesting that a chlorhexidine mouthwash is detrimental in this clinical situation.

Galactose-1-phosphatase in rat brain.

A prominent galactose-1-phosphatase was isolated from rat brain and partially purified by chromatography on diethylaminoethyl-Sephacel, hydroxylapatite, and Sephacryl S-300 columns. The galactose-1-phosphatase was separated from alkaline phosphatase, and from two forms of glucose-1-phosphatase. The three columns gave a 10-fold increase in specific activity to 290 mol/min/mg of protein, with a yield of 15%. Of the eight sugar phosphates tested, galactose-1-phosphate was the best substrate for the purified enzyme, followed by glucose-1-phosphate, which was hydrolyzed 40% as rapidly as galactose-1-phosphate. Galactose-1-phosphatase had an optimum pH of 8.5 and a Km value of 2.5 mM for galactose-1-phosphate hydrolysis. Mg2+ was required for activity, and supported half-maximal activity at a concentration of 1.25 mM. Phosphate was the only potent inhibitor found ATP, arsenate, and vanadate caused moderate inhibition of 10 mM levels, whereas AMP, L-homoarginine, and L-phenylalanine stimulated enzyme activity. Galactose-1-phosphatase was determined to have a Stokes radius of 30 A and a sedimentation coefficient of 4.1S. These values were used to calculate a molecular weight of 50,200 and a frictional ratio showing the enzyme to be a globular protein. It is hypothesized that a similar phosphatase may play a role in reducing brain galactose-1-phosphate concentrations in patients with galactosemia.