Massachusetts General Hospital Hairpulling Scale: Validity and Reliability Study of the Turkish Form. / Massachusetts Genel Hastane Saç/Kil Yolma Ölçegi: Türkçe Formunun Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalismasi.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to analyze the validity and reliability of the Turkish form of Massachusetts General Hospital Hairpulling Scale (MGH-HPS), which is used to measure the severity of Trichotillomania (TTM). METHODS: Fifty patients diagnosed with TTM according to the DSM-5 diagnostic criteria and fifty healthy controls participated in the study. The participants were asked to complete a sociodemographic questionnaire, the MGH-HPS-TR, the Clinical Global Impression (CGI), the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) and the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS-11). The construct validity and the criterion validity of the MGH-HPS-TR were determined by means of exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), respectively. The reliability analysis of the MGH-HPS-TR was assessed by calculating the Cronbach's α coefficient and the item total correlation coefficient. The values for the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity and specificity were based on the ROC analysis. RESULTS: AFA and CFA results indicated a single factor structure with 7 items explaining 82.5% of the variance. The item/factor loadings were satisfactory with the best fit indeces. Correlations were found between the scores on the MGH-HPS-TR and the other scales used for criterion validity analyses. The internal consistency and the item-total correlation coefficients of the scale were found to be satisfactory. Based on a cut of point of ≥ 9, the scale had high power for discriminating between the patient and the control groups and high sensitivity and specificity. CONCLUSION: This study showed that the MGH-HPS-TR can be used as a valid and reliable psychometric tool in Turkey.

Facial emotion recognition difficulties may be specific to skin picking disorder, but could also be related to the presence of alexithymia in trichotillomania

Background and objectives. Previous research has shown high rates of alexithymia and emotion dysregulation in trichotillomania (TTM) and skin picking disorder (SPD). Unfortunately, there are no data on facial emotion recognition (FER) in TTM and SPD. The present study aimed to compare patients with TTM and SPD and a healthy control group for the severity of alexithymia and rates of FER. Methods. Forty patients with SPD, 30 patients with TTM, and 30 healthy controls were enrolled in this study. The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), Clinical Global Impression (CGI), Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20), and the Facial Emotion Recognition Test were applied to the participants. Results. Patients with TTM and SPD had less FER accuracy and higher alexithymia scores compared with healthy controls. According to ANCOVA analysis, when anxiety, depression, and alexithymia were fixed as covariates, disgusted facial expressions and total facial emotion recognition were still significantly lower in patients with SPD compared with the control group, but there was no difference between the TTM and control groups and TTM and SPD groups. Conclusion. Alexithymia rates were high in patients with TTM and SPD. Interestingly, difficulty in recognizing disgusted facial expressions may be a distinctive sign in SPD. Future neuroimaging studies are needed to support possible FER impairment in patients with TTM/SPD.

Clinical Characteristics and Comorbidities of Patients with Trichotillomania and Skin Picking Disorder Who Admitted to a Psychodermatology Outpatient Clinic: A Comparative Study. / Psikodermatoloji Poliklinigine Basvuran Trikotillomani ve Deri Yolma Bozuklugu Tanili Hastalarin Klinik Özellikleri ve Es Tanilari: Bir Karsilastirma Çalismasi.

OBJECTIVE: Trichotillomania (TTM) and Skin Picking Disorder (SPD) are psychiatric disorders characterized by chronic and compulsive pulling and picking to remove hair and skin. There are very few studies on the clinical and phenomenological differences of TTM and SPD. In this study we aimed to compare the clinical characteristics and comorbidities of patients diagnosed with TTM and SPD. METHOD: We enrolled 56 TTM and 113 SPD patients who were assessed with SCID-I for DSM-IV. In addition, we evaluated the DSM- 5 criteria for Obsessive and Compulsive Disorder spectrum. We also utilized sociodemographic form, the Clinical Global Impression Scale, the Beck Anxiety Inventory and the Beck Depression Inventory. RESULTS: Although patients with TTM and SPD had many common clinical features and comorbidities, statistically significant differences were determined in the number of the pulling/picking sites (Z=- 7.084; p<0.001), the type of the outpatient clinics which they initially consulted (χ2=19.451; p<0.001), reasons for pulling/picking behavior (p<0.05) and comorbidities of depression (χ2=3.878; p=0.049) and onychophagia (χ2=7.173; p=0.007). Disease severity and depression and anxiety scores of patients with TTM and SPD who had comorbid diseases were statistically significantly higher compared to the patients without comorbidities (p<0.005). CONCLUSION: TTM and SPD often present with common clinical characteristics and a high incidence of psychiatric comorbidities. Finding out the clinical characteristics, the triggering factors and determining the comorbidities are important to gain an understanding of the course and determine the appropriate treatment for these disorders. Hence, phenomenological studies on large patient populations are needed.