Effects of repeated propranolol administration in a rat model of surgically induced endometriosis.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether propranolol has an inhibitory effect on the angiogenesis of endometriosis in an experimental rat model or not. STUDY DESIGN: This was an experimental animal model study. Twenty-four female Wistar albino rats (200-250 g) were used to create a model for surgical induction of endometriosis. Two rats died during the surgeries. The rats were randomly divided into treatment (n=11) and control groups (n=10), which were treated with daily intraperitoneal propranolol (10 mg/kg) and saline (2 mL), respectively. Study duration was 8 weeks. The volumes and histopathological findings of the implants, and immunochemistry for vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), metalloproteinase (MMP)-2, and MMP-9 were evaluated. RESULTS: Viable endometriotic implants were created in all animals. In the propranolol-treated group, the mean implant volume significantly decreased after treatment (142.5 vs. 32.1 mm(3), respectively; p=0.008), while the mean implant volume significantly increased in the control group (141.0 vs. 174.2 mm(3), respectively; p=0.009). There were also significant reductions in VEGF immunoreactivity scores and both stroma and epithelium MMP-2 and MMP-9 immunoreactivity scores in the propranolol-treated group compared with the control group (p<0.005 for all scores). CONCLUSIONS: Propranolol may suppress endometrial tissue by its antiangiogenic activity through inhibitory actions on VEGF, MMP-2, and MMP-9. Therefore, propranolol is a promising candidate drug for effective treatment of patients with endometriosis, which needs to be confirmed with further studies.

Outcome of intrauterine pregnancies with intrauterine device in place and effects of device location on prognosis.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to compare the outcome of pregnancies with retained or removed intrauterine devices (IUDs) and the effect of IUD location on pregnancy outcome. STUDY DESIGN: In a retrospective cohort study, we searched 27,578 records of women who had CuT380 IUD inserted, and 144 pregnancies with IUD were analyzed. IUDs were removed from 114 patients and retained for 30 patients. RESULTS: The combined risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes (miscarriage, intrauterine fetal death, intrauterine growth retardation, preterm birth and preterm premature rupture of membranes) was 36.8% in the IUD-removed group and 63.3% in the IUD-retained group [p<.01; relative risk (RR)=2.0; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.3-3.3]. Newborns of the IUD-retained women had significantly lower Apgar scores and significantly higher admission rate to the neonatal intensive care unit (p=.01; RR=10.8; 95% CI 1.04-111.6 and p<.01; RR=4.5; 95% CI 1.5-12.9, respectively). There were more miscarriages and adverse pregnancy outcome when the IUD was retained (16.9% vs. 66.7%) in patients with an IUD in low-lying position (p<.01; RR=3.9; 95% CI 1.8-8.6). CONCLUSION: Women who conceived with an IUD in place and chose to continue the pregnancy without removing the IUD need close follow-up, as there appears to be higher risk of adverse pregnancy and neonatal outcome. Furthermore, when the IUD is retained in the low-lying position, there is increased risk of miscarriage and adverse pregnancy outcome compared to removal of the IUD. Future randomized controlled studies are needed to determine the outcome of pregnancies with retained or removed IUD. IMPLICATIONS: In this study, we have evaluated the IUD location and its effect on pregnancy outcome in women with a retained or removed IUD. This study is the first to investigate the relationship between IUD location and pregnancy outcome in women who conceived with an IUD. We need evidence from a collaborative multicenter randomized trial to answer the question of whether the IUD should be removed in case of pregnancy.