Multicenter Observational Study of the First-Generation Intravenous Blood Glucose Monitoring System in Hospitalized Patients.

BACKGROUND: Current methods of blood glucose (BG) monitoring and insulin delivery are labor intensive and commonly fail to achieve the desired level of BG control. There is great clinical need in the hospital for a user-friendly bedside device that can automatically monitor the concentration of BG safely, accurately, frequently, and reliably. METHODS: A 100-patient observation study was conducted at 6 US hospitals to evaluate the first generation of the Intravenous Blood Glucose (IVBG) System (Edwards Lifesciences LLC & Dexcom Inc). Device safety, accuracy, and reliability were assessed. A research nurse sampled blood from a vascular catheter every 4 hours for ≤ 72 hours and BG concentration was measured using the YSI 2300 STAT Plus Analyzer (YSI Life Sciences). The IVBG measurements were compared to YSI measurements to calculate point accuracy. RESULTS: The IVBG systems logged more than 5500 hours of operation in 100 critical care patients without causing infection or inflammation of a vein. A total of 44135 IVBG measurements were performed in 100 patients with 30231 measurements from the subset of 75 patients used for accuracy analysis. In all, 996 IVBG measurements were time-matched with reference YSI measurements. These pairs had a mean absolute difference (MAD) of 11.61 mg/dl, a mean absolute relative difference (MARD) of 8.23%, 93% met 15/20% accuracy defined by International Organization for Standardization 15197:2003 standard, and 93.2% were in zone A of the Clarke error grid. The IVBG sensors were exposed to more than 200 different medications with no observable effect on accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: The IVBG system is an automated and user-friendly glucose monitoring system that provides accurate and frequent BG measurements with great potential to improve the safety and efficacy of insulin therapy and BG control in the hospital, potentially leading to improved clinical outcomes.

Accuracy of a feasibility version of an intravenous continuous glucose monitor in volunteers with diabetes and hospitalized patients.

BACKGROUND: A feasibility version of the GlucoClear™ continuous glucose monitoring system (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA), the intravenous blood glucose (IVBG) system, developed to facilitate glycemic management, was evaluated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two pilot studies were conducted. Ten volunteers with diabetes (1,725 matched pairs) and 10 patients scheduled for intensive care unit (ICU) admission following surgery (1,393 matched pairs) were studied. The patients' blood glucose concentrations were monitored by the IVBG system every 5 min for up to 72 h. The accuracy of the IVBG system was calculated and compared with the Yellow Springs Instrument (YSI) (Yellows Springs, OH) and Radiometer (Copenhagen, Denmark) measurements to determine the percentage of matched pairs that met 15/20%, 10/15%, 12/12.5%, and 10/10% assessment criteria. Performance was calculated as the percentage of the total measurements that would have been displayed in an unblinded study. Adverse events were monitored. RESULTS: The accuracy of the IVBG system met the International Organization for Standardization ISO 15197 15/20% criterion (99.07% in volunteers, 99.43% in the ICU, and both vs. YSI) and the stricter 10/15% criterion (96.17% in volunteers, 96.77% in the ICU, and both vs. YSI) over the 72-h period and across a broad range of blood glucose concentrations. Performance was 89.97% in the ICU study. The adverse device effects included induration of the peripheral vein, mild bruising, and mild hematoma. In the volunteers, there were patency problems with six catheters. CONCLUSIONS: The IVBG system is safe, accurate, and reliable. This minimally invasive system was not affected by potentially interfering medications. Real-time measurements, alarms, and trends provided by the IVBG system might support glycemic control protocols and prevent glycemic events in critically ill patients.