Late arm and shoulder problems after axillary therapeutic lymph node dissection in patients with melanoma.

INTRODUCTION: Lymphedema is exempted, only a few studies have dealt with the late adverse effects in melanoma patients who have undergone axillary therapeutic lymph node dissection (ATLND) for the clinical nodal disease. We evaluated the data on late arm/shoulder problems (ASPs) reported by the patients and daily life impairment after ATLND and identified the risk factors. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between 2008 and 2014, 82 patients underwent full en bloc Level I-III ATLND. After a median of 56 months (range 34-104), 76 patients (compliance: 93%) rated their ASPs and daily life dysfunction in a questionnaire, leading to the calculation of individual a Symptom/Problem Summary Score and a Function Summary Score. Multivariate analyses identified risk factors. RESULTS: Two groups of patients were identified. Group 1: no or mild ASPs, n = 56 (74%). Group 2: at least one moderate, severe and very severe ASP, n = 20 (26%). Overall, lymphedema, numbness and restricted arm movements represented the most frequent ASPs. Based on the distribution of the summary scores, about 60% of the patients reported no or only mild symptoms/problems and no or mild dysfunction. More than mild impairment of daily life was reported by five patients. On multivariate analyses, increasing tumor size and decreasing age were identified as risk factors. CONCLUSION: Our sample shows that ATLND in melanoma patients with the clinically detectable disease can be performed without a major risk of late ASPs and impaired daily life. Increasing tumor size and decreasing age at the surgery are risk factors for developing ASP-related dysfunction.

2-cm versus 4-cm surgical excision margins for primary cutaneous melanoma thicker than 2 mm: a randomised, multicentre trial.

BACKGROUND: Optimum surgical resection margins for patients with clinical stage IIA-C cutaneous melanoma thicker than 2 mm are controversial. The aim of the study was to test whether survival was different for a wide local excision margin of 2 cm compared with a 4-cm excision margin. METHODS: We undertook a randomised controlled trial in nine European centres. Patients with cutaneous melanoma thicker than 2 mm, at clinical stage IIA-C, were allocated to have either a 2-cm or a 4-cm surgical resection margin. Patients were randomised in a 1:1 allocation to one of the two groups and stratified by geographic region. Randomisation was done by sealed envelope or by computer generated lists with permuted blocks. Our primary endpoint was overall survival. The trial was not masked at any stage. Analyses were by intention to treat. Adverse events were not systematically recorded. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01183936. FINDINGS: 936 patients were enrolled from Jan 22, 1992, to May 19, 2004; 465 were randomly allocated to treatment with a 2-cm resection margin, and 471 to receive treatment with a 4-cm resection margin. One patient in each group was lost to follow-up but included in the analysis. After a median follow-up of 6·7 years (IQR 4·3-9·5) 181 patients in the 2-cm margin group and 177 in the 4-cm group had died (hazard ratio 1·05, 95% CI 0·85-1·29; p=0.64). 5-year overall survival was 65% (95% CI 60-70) [corrected] in the 2-cm group and 65% (40-70) in the 4-cm group (p=0·69). INTERPRETATION: Our findings suggest that a 2-cm resection margin is sufficient and safe for patients with cutaneous melanoma thicker than 2 mm. FUNDING: Swedish Cancer Society and Stockholm Cancer Society.