Does cabergoline administration affect endometrial VEGFR-2 expression in a rat model of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome?

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of cabergoline on endometrial vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 (VEGFR-2) immunoexpression in an ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) rat model. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty-one immature female Wistar rats were assigned into three groups: group 1, the control group; group 2, stimulated with gonadotropins to mimic OHSS; and group 3, in which an OHSS protocol was induced and thereafter treated with cabergoline (100 µg/kg/day). Body weight, ovarian volume, corpora lutea numbers, and endometrial VEGFR-2 expression were compared between the groups. RESULTS: Weight gain and ovarian volume were highest in the OHSS-placebo group, while cabergoline administration significantly reversed those effects (p = 0.001 and p = 0.001, respectively). VEGFR-2 stained cells were significantly lower in groups 2 and 3 compared to group 1 (p = 0.002). Although VEGFR-2 expression was lowest in group 3, the difference was not statistically significant. Corpora lutea numbers were also similar (p = 0.465). CONCLUSION: While successful implantation requires a vascularized receptive endometrium, impaired expression of VEGFR-2 and disrupted endometrial angiogenesis due to cabergoline administration may be associated with IVF failure in fresh OHSS cycles. The insignificant decrease in endometrial VEGFR-2 expression observed in this research needs to be investigated by further studies involving additional techniques such as immunoblotting and/or RT-PCR analyses.

Influence of Catheter Type and Tenaculum Use on Intrauterine Insemination Outcome.

BACKGROUND: We investigated the impact of the choice of catheter type and tenaculum use on pregnancy related outcomes in intrauterine insemination (IUI) treatments. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 338 consecutive IUI cycles were assessed in this retrospective study. Participants were divided according to the insemination technique - soft catheter (group 1; n=175), firm catheter (group 2; n=100), or tenaculum (group 3; n=63). Clinical, laboratory, semen parameters and pregnancy related outcomes were compared. RESULTS: Demographic characteristics and laboratory parameters were similar between the groups (P>0.05). The clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) was significantly higher in the firm catheter (19%, 19/100) and tenaculum (31.7%, 20/63) groups compared to the soft catheter group (5.1%, 9/175),(P<0.001). There were no significant differences between the groups in live birth and miscarriage rates per clinical pregnancy (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that the use of a firm catheter or tenaculum for IUI might result in a higher CPR, but might not have a considerable effect on the live birth rate (LBR). Further prospective randomized studies are required to determine the long-term effects of the catheter type or tenaculum use on IUI success.