COVID-19: booster(s) vs. hospitalization and Intensive Care Unit admission.

OBJECTIVE: As the pandemic continues, different vaccine protocols have been implemented to maintain the protection of vaccines and to provide protection against new variants. The aim of this study was to assess hospitalized patients' vaccination status and document the efficacy of boosters. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The patients that were hospitalized due to COVID-19 were enrolled from 28 hospitals in Turkey for five months from September 2021. 5,331 confirmed COVID-19 patients from collaborating centers were randomly enrolled to understand/estimate the distribution of vaccination status in hospitalized patients and to compare the efficacy of vaccination/booster protocols. RESULTS: 2,779 men and 2,552 women of which 2,408 (45.2%) were admitted to Intensive Care Units participated in this study. It was found that the highest risk reduction for all age groups was found in groups that received 4 doses. Four doses of vaccination for every 3.7 people under 50 years of age, for every 5.7 people in the 50-64 age group, and for every 4.3 people over 65 years of age will prevent 1 patient from being admitted to intensive care. Regardless of the type of vaccine, it was found that the risk of ICU hospitalization decreased in those who were vaccinated compared to those who were not vaccinated. Regardless of the type of vaccine, the ICU risk was found to decrease 1.25-fold in those who received 1 or 2 doses of vaccine, 1.18-fold in those who received 3 doses, and 3.26-fold in those who received 4 doses. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggested that the addition of a fourth dose is more effective in preventing intensive unit care even in disadvantaged groups.

Refractory duodenal ulcer healing and relapse: comparison of omeprazole with Helicobacter pylori eradication.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate differences between omeprazole and Helicobacter pylori eradication in patients with duodenal ulcers refractory to H2-receptor antagonists and to compare the recurrence rates after the two treatments. DESIGN AND METHODS: Forty-five patients with endoscopically proven duodenal ulcers refractory to H2-receptor antagonists and H. pylori infection were randomly assigned to 8 weeks of treatment with omeprazole 40 mg/day or 4 weeks of treatment with colloidal bismuth subcitrate 480 mg/day plus metronidazole 750 mg/day and tetracycline 1000 mg/day from day 1 to day 14. Patients were evaluated endoscopically and clinically at the end of treatment. Patients with healed ulcers were followed up for 1 year after cessation of the treatment. Endoscopy was performed at 3 and 12 months. RESULTS: Ulcer healing occurred in 100% (21/21) of patients on triple therapy and 70.5% (12/17) of those treated with omeprazole alone (P = 0.0123). The relapse rate at the 3rd month was 11.7% (2/17) in the triple therapy group and 60% (6/10) in the omeprazole group (P = 0.0248). Of the patients followed to study endpoint (relapse or endoscopy at 12 months) three of 12 (25%) receiving triple therapy, compared to six of eight (75%) receiving omeprazole, relapsed (P = 0.0648). CONCLUSION: These results show that triple therapy is more effective than omeprazole in the treatment of refractory duodenal ulcers and reduces the rate of ulcer relapse.