Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Acta Biomater ; 147: 198-208, 2022 07 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35643198

ABSTRACT

Corneal collagen crosslinking (CXL) is a commonly used minimally invasive surgical technique to prevent the progression of corneal ectasias, such as keratoconus. Unfortunately, riboflavin/UV-A light-based CXL procedures have not been successfully applied to all patients, and result in frequent complications, such as corneal haze and endothelial damage. We propose a new method for corneal crosslinking by using a Ruthenium (Ru) based water-soluble photoinitiator and visible light (430 nm). Tris(bipyridine)ruthenium(II) ([Ru(bpy)3]2+) and sodium persulfate (SPS) mixture covalently crosslinks free tyrosine, histidine, and lysine groups under visible light (400-450 nm), which prevents UV-A light-induced cytotoxicity in an efficient and time saving collagen crosslinking procedure. In this study, we investigated the effects of the Ru/visible blue light procedure on the viability and toxicity of human corneal epithelium, limbal, and stromal cells. Then bovine corneas crosslinked with ruthenium mixture and visible light were characterized, and their biomechanical properties were compared with the customized riboflavin/UV-A crosslinking approach in the clinics. Crosslinked corneas with a ruthenium-based CXL approach showed significantly higher young's modulus compared to riboflavin/UV-A light-based method applied to corneas. In addition, crosslinked corneas with both methods were characterized to evaluate the hydrodynamic behavior, optical transparency, and enzymatic resistance. In all biomechanical, biochemical, and optical tests used here, corneas that were crosslinked with ruthenium-based approach demonstrated better results than that of corneas crosslinked with riboflavin/ UV-A. This study is promising to be translated into a non-surgical therapy for all ectatic corneal pathologies as a result of mild conditions introduced here with visible light exposure and a nontoxic ruthenium-based photoinitiator to the cornea. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Keratoconus, one of the most frequent corneal diseases, could be treated with riboflavin and ultraviolet light-based photo-crosslinking application to the cornea of the patients. Unfortunately, this method has irreversible side effects and cannot be applied to all keratoconus patients. In this study, we exploited the photoactivation behavior of an organoruthenium compound to achieve corneal crosslinking. Ruthenium-based organic complex under visible light demonstrated significantly better biocompatibility and superior biomechanical results than riboflavin and ultraviolet light application. This study promises to translate into a new fast, efficient non-surgical therapy option for all ectatic corneal pathologies.


Subject(s)
Keratoconus , Photochemotherapy , Ruthenium , Animals , Cattle , Collagen/pharmacology , Cornea/pathology , Cross-Linking Reagents/pharmacology , Humans , Keratoconus/drug therapy , Keratoconus/pathology , Photosensitizing Agents/pharmacology , Photosensitizing Agents/therapeutic use , Riboflavin/pharmacology , Ruthenium/pharmacology , Ultraviolet Rays
2.
Prog Biomater ; 7(1): 1-21, 2018 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29446015

ABSTRACT

Wounds are of a variety of types and each category has its own distinctive healing requirements. This realization has spurred the development of a myriad of wound dressings, each with specific characteristics. It is unrealistic to expect a singular dressing to embrace all characteristics that would fulfill generic needs for wound healing. However, each dressing may approach the ideal requirements by deviating from the 'one size fits all approach', if it conforms strictly to the specifications of the wound and the patient. Indeed, a functional wound dressing should achieve healing of the wound with minimal time and cost expenditures. This article offers an insight into several different types of polymeric materials clinically used in wound dressings and the events taking place at cellular level, which aid the process of healing, while the biomaterial dressing interacts with the body tissue. Hence, the significance of using synthetic polymer films, foam dressings, hydrocolloids, alginate dressings, and hydrogels has been reviewed, and the properties of these materials that conform to wound-healing requirements have been explored. A special section on bioactive dressings and bioengineered skin substitutes that play an active part in healing process has been re-examined in this work.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...