CSF drainage ameliorates the motor deficit in normal pressure hydrocephalus: evidence from the analysis of grasping movements.

Apart from the classic triad of hypokinetic gait disorder, cognitive dysfunction and urinary incontinence, the clinical spectrum of normal pressure hydrocephalus has been found to affect the upper limbs. It is unclear if the motor deficit of hand and arm movements improves with CSF evacuation. The present study was designed to quantitatively assess the effect of CSF evacuation on the hypokinesia of grasping movements in normal pressure hydrocephalus. Eight subjects with normal pressure hydrocephalus grasped to lift an instrumented object prior to and following evacuation of 40 ml CSF. The build-up of fingertip forces and the kinematics of the lifting movement were slower for patients compared with healthy controls. Patients also generated excessive grasping forces when lifting and holding the object stationary prior to and following CSF evacuation. CSF evacuation significantly improved the gait disorder, the cognitive impairment and the urinary incontinence in normal pressure hydrocephalus. CSF evacuation accelerated the lifting movement and reduced the grip force overshoot. These data suggest that the measurement of grasping forces may provide an additional test to quantify the clinical response to CSF tapping in normal pressure hydrocephalus.

Reirradiation of recurrent high-grade gliomas using amino acid PET (SPECT)/CT/MRI image fusion to determine gross tumor volume for stereotactic fractionated radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: To develop a valid treatment strategy for recurrent high-grade gliomas using stereotactic hypofractionated reirradiation based on biologic imaging and temozolomide. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The trial included a total of 44 patients with recurrent high-grade gliomas (1 patient with anaplastic oligodendroglioma, 8 with anaplastic astrocytoma, 33 with glioblastoma multiforme, and 2 with gliosarcoma) after previous surgery and postoperative conventional radiotherapy +/- chemotherapy. For fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (SFRT) treatment planning, the gross tumor volume was defined by (11)C-methionine positron emission tomography (MET-PET) or (123)I-alpha-methyl-tyrosine (IMT) single-photon computed emission tomography (SPECT)/computed tomography (CT)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) fusion in 82% of the patients and by CT/T1+gadolinium-MRI image fusion in 18% of the patients. Six fractions of 5 Gy were administered in 6 days. In 29 of 44 patients (66%), chemotherapy with temozolomide (200 mg/m(2) body surface/day) was given in one to two cycles before and four to five cycles after SFRT. The patients were evaluated in follow-up by clinical investigators and MRI or CT every 3 months after SFRT until death. In cases suspicious for radiation necrosis, a MET-PET or IMT-SPECT investigation was performed. RESULTS: The median survival time in the whole group was 8 months. Treatment planning based on PET(SPECT)/CT/MRI imaging was associated with improved survival in comparison to treatment planning using CT/MRI alone: median survival time 9 months vs. 5 months (p = 0.03, log-rank). Median survival time were 11 months for patients who received SFRT based on biologic imaging plus temozolomide and significantly lower, 6 months for patients treated with SFRT without biologic imaging, without temozolomide or without both (p = 0.008, log rank). The most important prognostic factor in univariate analysis was a long interval between initial diagnosis and recurrence (p = 0.0002, log-rank). In the multivariate model, time interval to retreatment (p = 0.006) and temozolomide (p = 0.04) remained statistically significant. No acute neurologic toxicity Grade 3 or higher and no Grade 4 hematologic toxicity was observed. CONCLUSION: This is the first study of biologic imaging optimized SFRT plus temozolomide in recurrent high-grade gliomas. It demonstrates the feasibility and safety of this approach. The most striking result of the trial is the statistically significant longer survival time in the univariate analysis for patients reirradiated using MET-PET or IMT-SPECT/CT/MRI image fusion in the treatment planning, in comparison to patients treated based on MRI/CT alone. Multivariate analysis confirmed a significant survival benefit from multimodal treatment (i.e., addition of temozolomide), despite the limited number of patients. Whether treatment planning with SPECT/PET independently influences survival has to be studied in a larger series of patients.

L-(methyl-11C) methionine positron emission tomography for target delineation in resected high-grade gliomas before radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: Using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), residual tumor cannot be differentiated from nonspecific postoperative changes in operated patients with brain gliomas. The higher specificity and sensitivity of L-(methyl-11C)-labeled methionine positron emissions tomography (MET-PET) in gliomas has been demonstrated in previous studies and is the rationale for the integration of this investigation in gross tumor volume delineation. The goal of this trial was to quantify the affect of MET-PET vs. with MRI in gross tumor volume definition for radiotherapy planning of high-grade gliomas. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The trial included 39 patients with resected malignant gliomas. MRI and MET-PET data were coregistered based on mutual information. The residual tumor volume on MET-PET and the volume of tissue abnormalities on T1-weighted MRI (gadolinium [Gd] enhancement) and T2-weighted MRI (hyperintensity areas) were compared using MET-PET/MRI fusion images. RESULTS: The MET-PET vs. Gd-enhanced T1-weighted MRI analysis was performed on 39 patients. In 5 patients (13%), MET uptake corresponded exactly with Gd enhancement, and in 29 (74%) of 39 patients, the region of MET uptake was larger than that of the Gd enhancement. In 27 (69%) of the 39 patients, the Gd enhancement area extended beyond the MET enhancement. MET uptake was detected up to 45 mm beyond the Gd enhancement. MET-PET vs. T2-weighted MRI was investigated in 18 patients. MET uptake did not correspond exactly with the hyperintensity areas on T2-weighted MRI in any patient. In 9 (50%) of 18 patients, MET uptake extended beyond the hyperintensity area on the T2-weighted MRI, and in 18 (100%), at least some hyperintensity on the T2-weighted MRI was located outside the MET enhancement area. MET uptake was detected up to 40 mm beyond the hyperintensity area on T2-weighted MRI. CONCLUSION: In operated patients with brain gliomas, the size and location of residual MET uptake differs considerably from abnormalities found on postoperative MRI. Because postoperative changes cannot be differentiated from residual tumor by MRI, MET-PET, with a greater specificity for tumor tissue, can help to outline the gross tumor volume with greater accuracy.

Implications of IMT-SPECT for postoperative radiotherapy planning in patients with gliomas.

PURPOSE: Using MRI, residual tumor cannot be differentiated from nonspecific postoperative changes in patients with brain gliomas after surgical resection. The goal of this study was to analyze the value of 123I-alpha-methyl-tyrosine-single photon emission CT (IMT-SPECT) in radiotherapy planning of patients with brain gliomas after surgical resection. METHODS AND MATERIALS: In 66 patients with surgically resected brain gliomas (33 glioblastomas, 20 anaplastic astrocytomas, 7 anaplastic oligodendrogliomas, and 6 low-grade astrocytomas), IMT-SPECT and MRI were performed for radiotherapy planning. On the MRI/IMT-SPECT fusion images, the volume with IMT uptake was compared with the volume of the hyperintensity areas of T(2)-weighted MRI and with the volume of contrast enhancement on T(1)-weighted MRI. The regions with IMT uptake and/or MRI changes (composite Vol-MRI/IMT), regions with overlay of IMT uptake and MRI changes (common Vol-MRI/IMT), area with IMT uptake without MRI changes (increase Vol-MRI/IMT), and area with only MRI changes (Vol-MRI minus IMT) were analyzed separately. The planning target volume and boost volume defined using MRI information alone was compared with the planning target volume and boost volume defined by also using the SPECT information. RESULTS: Focally increased IMT uptake was observed in 25 (38%) of 66 patients, contrast enhancement on MRI was outlined in 59 (89%) of 66 patients, and hyperintensity areas on T(2)-weighted MRI were found in all 66 investigated patients. The mean composite Vol-T(2)/IMT was 73 cm(3). The relative increase Vol-T(2)/IMT, mean relative common Vol-T(2)/IMT, and mean relative Vol-T(2) minus IMT was 4%, 6%, and 90% of the composite Vol-T(2)/IMT, respectively. The mean composite Vol-T(1)/IMT was 14 cm(3) and the mean relative increase Vol-T(1)/IMT, mean relative common Vol-T(1)/IMT, and mean relative Vol-T(1) minus IMT was 21%, 4%, and 64% of the mean composite Vol-T(1)/IMT, respectively. In 19 (29%) of 66 patients, the focal IMT uptake was located outside the MRI changes. In this subgroup, the mean residual volume defined by focal IMT uptake in MRI/IMT-SPECT images, mean Vol-T(1), and mean Vol-T(2) was 19 cm(3), 10 cm(3), and 70 cm(3), respectively. The mean relative increase T(2)/IMT was 14% and T(1)/IMT was 61%. In this subgroup, the additional information of SPECT led to an increase in boost volume (mean relative increase BV-IMT) by 20%. CONCLUSION: In patients with surgically resected brain gliomas, the size and location of residual IMT uptake differs considerably from the abnormalities found on postoperative MRI. Because of the known high specificity of IMT uptake for tumor tissue, the findings on IMT-SPECT may significantly modify the target volumes for radiotherapy planning. This will help to focus the high irradiation dose on the tumor area and to spare normal brain tissue.