Impact of diabetes mellitus severity, treatment regimen and glycaemic control on atrial fibrillation prevalence in the Polish population aged ≥ 65.

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a well-known risk factor for atrial fibrillation (AF), but the mechanism(s) by which DM affects AF prevalence remains unclear. This study aims to evaluate the impact of diabetes mellitus severity (expressed as its known duration), antihyperglycemic treatment regimen and glycaemic control on AF prevalence. From the representative sample of 3014 participants (mean age 77.5, 49.1% female) from the cross-sectional NOMED-AF study, 881 participants (mean age 77.6 ± 0.25, 46.4% female) with concomitant DM were involved in the analysis. AF was screened using a telemonitoring vest for a mean of 21.9 ± 9.1 days. The mean DM duration was 12 ± 0.35 years, but no significant impact of DM timespan on AF prevalence was observed. No differences in the treatment pattern (oral medication vs insulin vs both oral + insulin) among the study population with and without AF were shown (p = 0.106). Metabolic control reflected by HbA1c levels showed no significant association with AF and silent AF prevalence (p = 0.635; p = 0.094). On multivariate analyses, age (Odds Ratio (OR) 1.35, 95%CI: 1.18-1.53, p < 0.001), p = 0.042), body mass index (BMI; OR 1.043, 95%CI: 1.01-1.08, p = 0.027) and LDL < 100 mg/dl (OR 0.64, 95%CI: 0.42-0.97, p = 0.037) were independent risk factors for AF prevalence, while age (OR 1.45, 95%CI: 1.20-1.75, p < 0.001), LDL < 100 mg/dl (OR 0.43, 95%CI 0.23-0.82, p = 0.011), use of statins (OR 0.51, 95%CI: 0.28-0.94, p = 0.031) and HbA1c ≤ 6.5 (OR 0.46, 95%CI: 0.25-0.85, p = 0.013) were associated with silent AF prevalence. Diabetes duration, diabetic treatment pattern or metabolic control per se did not significantly impact the prevalence of AF, including silent AF detected by prospective continuous monitoring. Independent predictors of AF were age, BMI and low LDL levels, with statins and HbA1c ≤ 6.5 being additional independent predictors for silent AF.Trial registration: NCT03243474.

ATRIAL FIBRILLATION IN PATIENTS WITH CONCOMITANT DIABETES MELLITUS - WHAT DO WE ALREADY KNOW AND WHAT DO WE NEED TO DISCOVER?

Recently published data indicate the prevalence of atrial fibrillation, the most common cardiac arrhythmia worldwide, in up to 20% of the elderly population. This arrhythmia significantly impacts the quality of life by increasing the risk of stroke, thromboembolism, dementia or heart failure, resulting in a substantial increase in the risk of adverse events and all-cause death. On the other hand, diabetes mellitus is the most predominant metabolic disorder on the globe, which incidence is surging annually, currently affecting over 500 million individuals. Patients with coexisting diabetes have a relevantly elevated risk of atrial fibrillation development. This association have not yet been comprehensively elucidated. Nonetheless, it seems to be a multifactorial, complex relationship comprising mechanisms such as oxidative stress, insulin resistance, hemostasis and fibrinolysis disturbances or endothelium dysfunction, which lead to mechanical and electrical left atrial remodeling. Therefore, this study aims to summarize the evidence regarding the relationship linking diabetes mellitus and atrial fibrillation.

Adherence to the 'Atrial Fibrillation Better Care' Pathway in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: Impact on Clinical Outcomes-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 285,000 Patients.

OBJECTIVE: The 'Atrial fibrillation Better Care' (ABC) pathway has been recently proposed as a holistic approach for the comprehensive management of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). We performed a systematic review of current evidence for the use of the ABC pathway on clinical outcomes. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. PubMed and EMBASE were searched for studies reporting the prevalence of ABC-pathway-adherent management in AF patients, and its impact on clinical outcomes (all-cause death, cardiovascular death, stroke, and major bleeding). Meta-analysis of odds ratio (OR) was performed with random-effects models; subgroup analysis and meta-regression were performed to account for heterogeneity. Among the eight studies included, we found a pooled prevalence of ABC-adherent management of 21% (95% confidence interval, CI: 13-34%), with a high grade of heterogeneity, explained by the increasing adherence to each ABC criterion. Patients treated according to the ABC pathway showed a lower risk of all-cause death (OR: 0.42; 95% CI: 0.31-0.56), cardiovascular death (OR: 0.37; 95% CI: 0.23-0.58), stroke (OR: 0.55; 95% CI: 0.37-0.82) and major bleeding (OR: 0.69; 95% CI: 0.51-0.94), with moderate heterogeneity. Prevalence of comorbidities was moderators of heterogeneity for all-cause and cardiovascular death, while longer follow-up was associated with increased effectiveness for all outcomes. CONCLUSION: Adherence to the ABC pathway was suboptimal, being adopted in one in every five patients. Adherence to the ABC pathway was associated with a reduction in the risk of major adverse outcomes.

Relationship between diabetes mellitus and atrial fibrillation prevalence in the Polish population: a report from the Non-invasive Monitoring for Early Detection of Atrial Fibrillation (NOMED-AF) prospective cross-sectional observational study.

BACKGROUND: The global burden of atrial fibrillation (AF) and diabetes mellitus (DM) is constantly rising, leading to an increasing healthcare burden of stroke. AF often remains undiagnosed due to the occurrence in an asymptomatic, silent form, i.e., silent AF (SAF). The study aims to evaluate the relationships between DM and AF prevalence using a mobile long-term continuous ECG telemonitoring vest in a representative Polish and European population ≥ 65 years for detection of AF, symptomatic or silent. METHODS: A representative sample of 3014 participants from the cross-sectional NOMED-AF study was enrolled in the analyses (mean age 77.5, 49.1% female): 881 (29.2%) were diagnosed with DM. AF was screened using a telemonitoring vest for a mean of 21.9 ± 9.1days. RESULTS: Overall, AF was reported in 680 (22.6%) of the whole study population. AF prevalence was higher among subjects with concomitant DM (DM+) versus those without DM (DM-) [25%, 95% CI 22.5-27.8% vs 17%; 95% CI 15.4-18.5% respectively, p < 0.001]. DM patients were commonly associated with SAF [9%; 95% CI 7.9-11.4 vs 7%; 95% CI 5.6-7.5 respectively, p < 0.001], and persistent/permanent AF [12.2%; 95% CI 10.3-14.3 vs 6.9%; 95% CI 5.9-8.1 respectively, p < 0.001] compared to subjects without DM. The prolonged screening was associated with a higher percentage of newly established AF diagnosis in DM+ vs DM- patients (5% vs 4.5% respectively, p < 0.001). In addition to shared risk factors, DM+ subjects were associated with different AF and SAF independent risk factors compared to DM- individuals, including thyroid disease, peripheral/systemic thromboembolism, hypertension, physical activity and prior percutaneous coronary intervention/coronary artery bypass graft surgery. CONCLUSIONS: AF affects 1 out of 4 subjects with concomitant DM. The higher prevalence of AF and SAF among DM subjects than those without DM highlights the necessity of active AF screening specific AF risk factors assessment amongst the diabetic population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03243474.

Compliance of atrial fibrillation treatment with the ABC pathway in patients with concomitant diabetes mellitus in the Middle East based on the Gulf SAFE registry.

INTRODUCTION: Atrial fibrillation (AF) and diabetes mellitus (DM) constitute a heavy burden on healthcare expenditure due to their negative impact on clinical outcomes in the Middle East. The Atrial fibrillation Better Care (ABC) pathway provides a simple strategy of integrated approach of AF management: A-Avoid stroke; B-Better symptom control; C-Cardiovascular comorbidity risk management. AIMS: Evaluation of the AF treatment compliance to ABC pathway in DM patients in the Middle East. Assessment of the impact of ABC pathway adherence on all-cause mortality and the composite outcome of stroke/systemic embolism, all-cause death and cardiovascular hospitalisations. METHODS: From 2043 patients in the Gulf SAFE registry, 603 patients (mean age 63; 48% male) with DM were included in an analysis of ABC pathway compliance: A-appropriate use of anticoagulation according to CHA2 DS2 -VASc score; B-AF symptoms management according to the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) scale; C-Optimised cardiovascular comorbidities management. RESULTS: 86 (14.3%) patients were treated in compliance with the ABC pathway. During 1-year follow-up, 207 composite outcome events and 87 deaths occurred. Mortality was significantly lower in the ABC group vs non-ABC (5.8% vs 15.9%, P = .0014, respectively). On multivariate analysis, ABC compliance was associated with a lower risk of all-cause death and the composite outcome after 6 months (OR 0.18; 95% CI: 0.42-0.75 and OR 0.54; 95% Cl: 0.30-1.00, respectively) and at 1 year (OR 0.30; 95% Cl: 0.11-0.76 and OR 0.57; 95% Cl: 0.33-0.97, respectively) vs the non-ABC group. CONCLUSIONS: Compliance with the ABC pathway care was independently associated with the reduced risk of all-cause death and the composite outcome in DM patients with AF, highlighting the importance of an integrated approach to AF management.

Practice-derived data on non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant therapy to complement observations from randomized trials.

Anticoagulation is fundamental in the management of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). The study aims to provide a comparative review of the major phase III randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and real-world data (RWD) from reliable, high-grade Phase IV studies that assess the efficacy and safety of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) vs. vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). Observational studies based on nationwide or health insurance database records on the use of NOACs vs. VKAs in patients with AF were included. We performed a comparison of the efficacy and safety characteristics associated with NOACs vs. VKAs in RCTs and RWD. Although RCTs provide strong support for evidence-based practice, RWD may be used to reflect the broader picture of various clinical settings, provide supplementary insight and fulfil knowledge gaps. Both study types confirmed the safety and efficacy of NOACs in preventing stroke and thromboembolism in patients with AF. In comparison to VKAs, NOACs were associated with reduced risk of ischaemic events and lower rates of adverse events such as major bleeding or intracranial haemorrhage. Administration of NOACs might be associated with increased risk of dose-related gastrointestinal bleeding and myocardial ischaemic events, especially in the early treatment period after switching from VKAs. Special care should be taken in challenging clinical situations like severe renal or hepatic impairment when the treatment regimen needs to be considered individually. Randomized clinical trial and RWD studies are complementary and present comparable findings, affirming that NOACs are safe and effective for anticoagulation of patients with AF in daily clinical practice.

Compliance of Atrial Fibrillation Treatment with the Atrial Fibrillation Better Care (ABC) Pathway Improves the Clinical Outcomes in the Middle East Population: A Report from the Gulf Survey of Atrial Fibrillation Events (SAFE) Registry.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with substantially increased risk of cardiovascular events and overall mortality. The Atrial fibrillation Better Care (A-Avoid stroke, B-Better symptom management, C-Cardiovascular and comorbidity risk management) pathway provides a simple and comprehensive approach for integrated AF therapy. This study's goals were to evaluate the ABC pathway compliance and determine the main gaps in AF management in the Middle East population, and to assess the impact of ABC pathway adherence on the all-cause mortality and composite outcome in AF patients. 2021 patients (mean age 57; 52% male) from the Gulf SAFE registry were studied. We evaluated: A-appropriate implementation of OACs according to CHA2DS2-VASc score; B-symptom control according to European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) symptom scale; C-proper cardiovascular comorbidities management. The primary endpoints were the composite cardiovascular outcome (ischemic stroke or systemic embolism, all-cause death and cardiovascular hospitalization) and all-cause mortality. One-hundred and sixty-eight (8.3%) patients were optimally managed according to adherence with the ABC pathway. Over the one-year follow up (FU), there were 578 composite outcome events and 224 deaths. Patients managed with integrated care had significantly lower rates for the composite outcome and mortality comparing to non-ABC group (20.8% vs. 29.3%, p = 0.02 and 7.3% vs. 13.1%, p = 0.033, respectively). On multivariable analysis, ABC compliance was independently associated with reduced risk of composite outcome (HR 0.53; 95% CI 0.36-0.8, p = 0.002) and death (HR 0.46; 95% CI 0.25-0.86, p = 0.015). Integrated ABC pathway adherent care resulted in the reduced composite outcome and all-cause mortality in AF patients from Middle East, highlighting the necessity of promoting comprehensive holistic and integrated care management of AF.

One-year all-cause mortality risk among atrial fibrillation patients in Middle East with and without diabetes: The Gulf SAFE registry.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) poses a great risk of mortality, especially when associated with diabetes mellitus (DM). OBJECTIVES: We aimed to investigate the rate and risk factors for mortality among AF patients with and without DM in the population from the Middle East where it has never been investigated before. METHODS: We analyzed the Gulf-SAFE registry, involving patients with nonvalvular AF from the Middle East, for one-year all-cause mortality. The predictive capability of the CHA2DS2-VASc score for death was also investigated. RESULTS: Among a total of 2043 AF patients 606 had DM. Patients with DM were older and had significantly higher prevalence of multiple comorbidities (p < 0.05, respectively). Among patients with DM, age ≥ 75 (relative risk 2.34, 95% confidence interval 1.19-4.61), heart failure (HF) (RR 2.14, 95%CI 1.03-4.43), peripheral vascular disease (PVD) (RR 3.36, 95%CI 1.22-9.30) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) (RR 2.60, 95%CI 1.16-5.81) were independent risk factors for one year all-cause mortality. Patients with DM had significantly higher rates of heart failure and AF-related hospital admissions, all-cause mortality and composite outcome rates, in one year follow up. Among patients with DM, the CHA2DS2-VASc score was predictive of one-year all-cause mortality with c-index of 0.741 (95%CI 0.688-0.794). CONCLUSIONS: AF patients in Middle East with DM have a higher risk for all-cause mortality, HF and AF admission and composite outcome, compared to patients without DM. Multiple risk factors contribute to the higher mortality rate among patients with DM.

Invited review: hypertension and atrial fibrillation: epidemiology, pathophysiology, and implications for management.

Hypertension affects around half of the adult population worldwide, being one of the most common cardiovascular disorders. On a population basis, high blood pressure is considered to be the major independent risk factor for atrial fibrillation (AF). The incidence of both diseases has increased significantly in the recent decades and it is expected to continuously surge in the following years. Due to close relation between the both diseases and their frequent coexistence, hypertension and AF become major health priorities. The multidirectional linking between raised blood pressure and AF is based on complex associations including structural, hemodynamic, neuroendocrine, and autonomic mechanisms. Hypertension provokes excessive fibroblasts proliferation and increased collagen accumulation. It also stimulates cardiomyocytes apoptosis and inflammation, leading to diffused fibrosis and left ventricular hypertrophy development. This is mainly driven by renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) activation, and autonomic dysregulation. Moreover, exposure on long-term stretch due to hypertension causes arterial stiffness with subsequent systolic and diastolic function loss resulting in further heart muscle remodeling. All these pathological changes combined seem influence on myocardial electrical activity, triggering AF development. Given the prevalence and frequent lack of symptoms of both disorders, opportunistic arrhythmia screening in hypertensive patients is needed. In all individuals with established diagnosis of AF, adequate anticoagulation has to be considered for stroke prevention. Blood pressure control is also an essential component of a holistic approach to AF care.

A drug safety evaluation of apixaban for the treatment of atrial fibrillation, acute coronary syndrome, and percutaneous coronary intervention.

Introduction: The non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are changing the landscape for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF) and prevention or treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE). In patients with AF and concomitant acute coronary syndrome (ACS), the treatment regimen of combined NOACs and P2Y12 inhibitors is gaining popularity.Areas covered: We conducted a review of safety evaluation and effectiveness of apixaban for AF and ACS treatment, both alone and in combination with different antiplatelet treatment regimens. The aim was to provide an overview of apixaban including mechanism of action, indications, adverse events and tolerability.Expert opinion: Apixaban is recommended as a safe, well tolerated and effective oral anticoagulant for reducing the risk of ischemic events among AF patients. It is of value in prevention and treatment of VTE and pulmonary embolism. Comparing to VKA, apixaban was superior in preventing stroke or systemic embolism with lower major bleeding events among AF patients. When combined with dual antiplatelet therapy apixaban may cause dose-related increase in bleeding which reduces the benefit of this treatment regimen among ACS patients but without AF. In those with ACS and concomitant AF, the combination of apixaban with P2Y12 inhibitor appears to be safe and effective.

Should We Judge Stroke Risk by Static or Dynamic Risk Scores? A Focus on the Dynamic Nature of Stroke and Bleeding Risks in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most prevalent cardiac arrhythmia and a major risk factor for stroke. The number of patients with AF is predicted to increase in the next few decades. AF has also negative impact on quality of life as well as it significantly increases the risk of cardiovascular disease and overall mortality. Because the stroke is a pivotal outcome of AF, its prevention with the use of anticoagulation therapy constitutes an important component of AF management. The decision on oral anticoagulants' prescription should be based on appropriate risk stratification to allow for comprehensive assessment of benefit/hazard ratio of stroke and bleeding along with patients' preference. Several risk scores for stroke and bleeding as well as for stroke and systemic embolism have been developed, mainly in patients on vitamin K antagonists. AF guidelines stress the need for repetitive evaluation of thromboembolic and bleeding risks to tailor optimal AF management. Indeed, risk is not a static "one off" process and it should be adjusted for dynamic nature of risk factors. However, most risk scores are calculated according to baseline characteristics of patients, but the older the patients get, the more comorbidities they acquire, which influences stroke risk significantly. Hence, the default management of every patient with AF should include a regular reassessment of stroke and bleeding risk factors.

Cryoballoon ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with advanced systolic heart failure and cardiac implantable electronic devices.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary vein isolation with cryoballoon catheter ablation (CCB) is an effective method of treatment in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), but in patients with heart failure (HF) the role of CCB remains unknown. AIM: The aim of the study was to assess the feasibility, effectiveness, and safety of CCB in patients with HF and cardiac im-plantable electronic devices (CIEDs), the impact of the procedure on symptoms, and echocardiographic parameters. METHODS: Thirty consecutive HF patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 40% and CIED, referred for CCB of AF, were included. Procedural parameters were compared to a group of 59 consecutive patients without cardiac diseases referred for CCB (control group). RESULTS: The number of veins ablated per patient was smaller and application was performed less frequently in the right inferior pulmonary vein in the HF group compared with the control group (66.7% vs. 88.1%; p = 0.01, respectively). In two (6.7%) patients from the HF group and in five (8.5%) from the control group procedure-related complications occurred (p = 0.76). After six months 21 HF patients (70%), after one year 13 (43%), and after 625 days only three (10%) were free from arrhythmia. AF burden was significantly reduced after six months compared to the pre-ablation period (18.5% vs. 52.9%; p = 0.001). New York Heart Association and European Heart Rhythm Association classes were both significantly (p < 0.001) reduced and LVEF was higher after six months in the HF patients. CONCLUSIONS: Safety and feasibility of CCB for AF in HF patients with CIED are comparable to subjects with structurally nor-mal heart; however, stable positioning of the balloon in the right inferior pulmonary vein may be more challenging. Although late recurrences are common, ablation reduces arrhythmia burden and leads to a long-term improvement of symptoms and echocardiographic indices.