Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Gastrointest Surg ; 28(4): 528-533, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38583906

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: High-intensity interval training (HIT) can provide physiologic benefits and may improve postoperative recovery but has not been evaluated in inpatients. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and tolerability of HIT after major surgery. METHODS: We performed a phase I randomized study comparing HIT with low-intensity continuous ambulation (40 m) during the initial inpatient stay after major surgery at a large academic center. Clinicopathologic and pre- and post-exercise physiologic data were captured. Perceived exertion was measured throughout the intervention. RESULTS: Twenty-two subjects were enrolled and randomized with 90% (20 subjects, 10 per arm) completing all aspects of the study. One patient declined participation in the exercise intervention. The HIT and continuous ambulation groups were relatively similar in terms of median age (65.5 vs 63.5), female sex (20% vs 40%), White race (90% vs 90%), having a cancer diagnosis (100% vs 80%), undergoing gastrointestinal surgery (60% vs 80%), median Karnofsky score (60 vs 60), and ability to independently ambulate preoperatively (100% vs 90%). All subjects completed the exercise without protocol deviation, cohort crossover, or safety events. Compared with the continuous ambulation group, the HIT group had higher end median perceived exertion (5.0 [IQR, 5.5] vs 3.0 [IQR, 1.8]), shorter overall time to complete assigned exercise (56.6 seconds vs 91.8 seconds), and a trend toward higher median gait speed over 40 m (0.71 m/s vs 0.44 m/s, P = .126). CONCLUSION: HIT in the hospitalized postoperative patient is safe and may be implemented to help promote positive physiologic outcomes and recovery.


Subject(s)
High-Intensity Interval Training , Inpatients , Female , Humans , Exercise , Exercise Therapy/methods , High-Intensity Interval Training/adverse effects , High-Intensity Interval Training/methods , Walking , Male
2.
Anesth Analg ; 129(6): 1549-1556, 2019 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31743174

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Frequent hand hygiene by anesthesia personnel may be an important factor in reducing contamination of IV lines and medication access ports and may reduce hospital-acquired infections. Measurement of hand hygiene frequency at the individual clinician level by direct observation or electronic devices is cumbersome and expensive. We developed and validated a simple method for estimating hand hygiene frequency by individual anesthesia providers and utilized it in a quality improvement initiative to increase hand hygiene use. METHODS: Pump-style, alcohol-based hand hygiene container weight at the anesthesia work station was measured before and after each surgical operation and converted to estimated number of accesses (pumps) per hour. Video observation was used to validate the estimated hand hygiene use. A quality improvement initiative utilized periodic measurement of hand hygiene frequency via the validated method, and incorporated individual provider feedback, email reminders, monthly departmental performance reports, and reminders in the electronic anesthesia record. Segmented linear regression was used to evaluate the effect of the intervention on hand hygiene use. RESULTS: Delivered product per pump was consistent for containers at least half-full and averaged (mean ± SD) 0.92 ± 0.13 g per pump. Video observation in 26 cases showed a strong correlation between observed hand hygiene episodes and estimated hand hygiene use frequency based on weight change of the container (linear regression, R = 0.97, P < .0001). Median hand hygiene frequency was near 0 at baseline but increased progressively throughout the intervention period (segmented linear regression, overall R = 0.76, P < .0001; change of intercept or mean hand hygiene after initiation of intervention [parameter estimate ± SE] [0.970 ± 0.29], P = .0008). CONCLUSIONS: A low-cost, simple method for measuring individual anesthesia clinician use of hand hygiene intraoperatively based on container weight change is feasible and sufficiently accurate to support a quality improvement initiative to increase its use.


Subject(s)
Anesthesiologists , Attitude of Health Personnel , Hand Disinfection , Hand Sanitizers , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Infection Control/methods , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Quality Improvement , Quality Indicators, Health Care , Humans , Reproducibility of Results , Time Factors , Video Recording , Weights and Measures
3.
J Clin Anesth ; 55: 20-23, 2019 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30586662

ABSTRACT

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine whether microbial contamination of anesthesia syringes prepared in the operating room (OR) become contaminated in a time-dependent fashion. DESIGN: Observational. SETTING: Operating suite in a major university hospital. PATIENTS: None (in vitro study). 400 syringes were studied for microbial contamination. INTERVENTIONS: Syringes prepared in the OR by anesthesia personnel were sampled at 1, 2, 3, or 4 h in a sterile fashion and sent to the microbiology laboratory for quantitative culture of any bacteria. MEASUREMENTS: Colony forming units (CFU) per mL of drug were calculated and any identified positive cultures were identified by Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry. Logistic regression was used to test the effect of time since preparation on prevalence of positive culture, as was the effect of number of accesses of the syringe and identity of the drug. MAIN RESULTS: Overall, 9/400 (2.25%) syringes were positive for bacteria. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) concentration of bacteria among positive cultures was 100 (100,100) CFU. All cultured species were generally nonpathogenic common contaminants. There was no effect of time since preparation, number of accesses of the syringe at the time of sampling, or drug identity (propofol vs. other). CONCLUSIONS: Contamination of anesthesia syringes is uncommon and occurs at a low overall concentration of bacteria. Contamination does not appear to be time related, and thus calls into question the reasonableness of USP Chapter 797's one-hour requirement.


Subject(s)
Anesthetics/standards , Bacteria/isolation & purification , Drug Contamination/statistics & numerical data , Operating Rooms/statistics & numerical data , Syringes/microbiology , Drug Contamination/prevention & control , Drug Packaging/standards , Humans , Operating Rooms/standards , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Syringes/standards , Time Factors
4.
Cardiovasc Dis ; 8(3): 413-420, 1981 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15216199

ABSTRACT

A new class of therapeutic agents, sharing inhibition of the slow calcium channel, will soon be available to the American patient. Selective action of these agents upon the atrioventricular node, the smooth muscle of coronary and peripheral arteries, and the contractility of cardiac muscle opens new vistas in cardiovascular pharmacology. Early release of these agents by the Federal Drug Administration for general use is urged, based upon the already wide and successful experience in the European and South American continents.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...