Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 10 de 10
Filter
1.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37877044

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Workplace violence (WPV) is increasing in healthcare and negatively impacts healthcare worker outcomes. De-escalation training for healthcare workers is recommended to reduce WPV from patients and visitors. Hospitalists may be at high risk for WPV, but the magnitude of WPV and the impact of de-escalation training among hospitalists is not known. Methods: We investigated the baseline prevalence of WPV experienced by 37 hospitalists at a single center. After an in-person de-escalation training, we measured hospitalists' self-reported "Confidence in Coping with Patient Aggression" using a validated scale (score range 10-110). Results: In the 12 months before de-escalation training, 86.5% of participants reported at least one form of WPV: 83.8% verbal abuse, 29.7% racial abuse, 18.9% physical violence, and 16.2% sexual abuse. The mean confidence score increased significantly from pre-training (43.2) to immediately after training (68.5) and remained significantly elevated at three months (57.2), six months (60.2), and after 12 months (59.9) (all P < 0.05; Ptrend <0.05). Conclusion: Hospitalists are at high risk for WPV. Structured in-person de-escalation training may provide the sustained ability for hospitalists to cope with WPV.

2.
J Gen Intern Med ; 38(16): 3628-3632, 2023 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37783978

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Over one in five Medicare patients discharged to skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) are re-hospitalized within 30 days of discharge. Poor communication between the hospital and SNF upon hospital discharge is frequently cited as the most common cause of readmission. AIM: The goal of this program was to assess the ability of a weekly post-discharge hospitalist led virtual rounding program to augment the written discharge summary sent to SNFs. SETTING: Two academic hospitals and six SNFs in Baltimore, MD. PARTICIPANTS: Hospitalists and medical directors or directors of nursing from the partner SNF. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION: During weekly encounters, the hospitalist and SNF providers discussed the clinical status, discharge medications, treatment plan, and follow-up care of all discharged patients. The intervention took place from July 2021 to December 2021. PROGRAM EVALUATION: During the study, 544 patients were discussed in a post-discharge virtual encounter. After the discussions, hospitalists identified clinically significant errors in 124 discharge summaries. A survey of participating hospitalists and SNF medical and nursing leadership indicated the intervention was thought to improve care transitions. DISCUSSION: Our innovation was successful in identifying errors in discharge summaries and was thought to improve the transition of care by participating SNF and hospitalist providers.


Subject(s)
Hospitalists , Patient Discharge , Aged , Humans , United States , Patient Readmission , Skilled Nursing Facilities , Aftercare , Medicare
3.
J Hosp Med ; 18(4): 302-315, 2023 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36797598

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: To relieve hospital capacity strain, hospitals often encourage clinicians to prioritize early morning discharges which may have unintended consequences. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to test the effects of hospitalist physicians prioritizing discharging patients first compared to usual rounding style. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Prospective, multi-center randomized controlled trial. Three large academic hospitals. Participants were Hospital Medicine attending-level physicians and patients the physicians cared for during the study who were at least 18 years of age, admitted to a Medicine service, and assigned by standard practice to a hospitalist team. INTERVENTION: Physicians were randomized to: (1) prioritizing discharging patients first as care allowed or (2) usual practice. MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURES: Main outcome measure was discharge order time. Secondary outcomes were actual discharge time, length of stay (LOS), and order times for procedures, consults, and imaging. RESULTS: From February 9, 2021, to July 31, 2021, 4437 patients were discharged by 59 physicians randomized to prioritize discharging patients first or round per usual practice. In primary adjusted analyses (intention-to-treat), findings showed no significant difference for discharge order time (13:03 ± 2 h:31 min vs. 13:11 ± 2 h:33 min, p = .11) or discharge time (15:22 ± 2 h:50 min vs. 15:21 ± 2 h:50 min, p = .45), for physicians randomized to prioritize discharging patients first compared to physicians using usual rounding style, respectively, and there was no significant change in LOS or on order times of other physician orders. CONCLUSIONS: Prioritizing discharging patients first did not result in significantly earlier discharges or reduced LOS.


Subject(s)
Hospitalists , Patient Discharge , Humans , Length of Stay , Prospective Studies , Hospitals
4.
J Pharm Pract ; 36(5): 1201-1210, 2023 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35484711

ABSTRACT

Background: Opioid related overdoses are a leading cause of death in the United States (U.S). National, state and local initiatives have been implemented to combat the opioid crisis. However, there is a paucity of initiatives that examine the role of comprehensive naloxone education interventions for hospitalized patients. Objective: The aim of this study was to design a multidisciplinary, pharmacist-driven, standardized, patient and product tailored, inpatient naloxone education program (NEP) at a U.S. academic medical center, targeting patients at high risk of opioid overdose, and to examine patients' retention of education. Methods: This prospective pilot study targeted hospitalized patients who were considered at high-risk for opioid overdose once discharged. Using daily screening methods and established inclusion criteria, we evaluated the impact of implementing a patient-tailored NEP. The primary outcome measures were patient knowledge and awareness of naloxone use. A paired t-test analysis was conducted to assess for improvement in patient naloxone awareness and knowledge. Results: Of ninety-five patients screened, forty-four patients met inclusion criteria and nineteen patients completed naloxone education along with pre- and post-assessments. Patients more accurately completed the assessment, indicating enhanced knowledge about naloxone use and administration, following the naloxone education (4.68 ± .13 vs 3.42 ± .31 out of 5 questions, mean ± SEM; P = .0016). Conclusion: This study found a positive impact on patient knowledge of naloxone use and administration following implementation of a robust and comprehensive NEP.


Subject(s)
Drug Overdose , Opiate Overdose , Opioid-Related Disorders , Humans , United States , Naloxone/therapeutic use , Narcotic Antagonists/therapeutic use , Pharmacists , Opiate Overdose/drug therapy , Pilot Projects , Prospective Studies , Analgesics, Opioid/adverse effects , Drug Overdose/drug therapy , Drug Overdose/prevention & control , Patient Education as Topic , Academic Medical Centers , Opioid-Related Disorders/drug therapy
5.
J Gen Intern Med ; 37(15): 3925-3930, 2022 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35657465

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hospitalist turnover is exceedingly high, placing financial burdens on hospital medicine groups (HMGs). Following training, many begin their employment in medicine as early-career hospitalists, the majority being millennials. OBJECTIVE: To understand what elements influence millennial hospitalists' recruitment and retention. DESIGN: We developed a survey that asked participants to rate the level of importance of 18 elements (4-point Likert scale) in their decision to choose or remain at an HMG. PARTICIPANTS: The survey was electronically distributed to hospitalists born in or after 1982 across 7 HMGs in the USA. MAIN MEASURES: Elements were grouped into four major categories: culture of practice, work-life balance, financial considerations, and career advancement. We calculated the means for all 18 elements reported as important across the sample. We then calculated means by averaging elements within each category. We used unpaired t-tests to compare differences in means for categories for choosing vs. remaining at an HMG. KEY RESULTS: One hundred forty-four of 235 hospitalists (61%) responded to the survey. 49.6% were females. Culture of practice category was the most frequently rated as important for choosing (mean 96%, SD 12%) and remaining (mean 96%, SD 13%) at an HMG. The category least frequently rated as important for both choosing (mean 69%, SD 35%) and remaining (mean 76%, SD 32%) at an HMG was career advancement. There were no significant differences between respondent gender, race, or parental status and ratings of elements for choosing or remaining with HMGs. CONCLUSION: Culture of practice at an HMG may be highly important in influencing millennial hospitalists' decision to choose and stay at an HMG. HMGs can implement strategies to create a millennial-friendly culture which may help improve recruitment and retention.


Subject(s)
Hospital Medicine , Hospitalists , Female , Humans , Male , Surveys and Questionnaires , Employment
6.
Open Forum Infect Dis ; 6(7)2019 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31363766

ABSTRACT

Arcobacter spp. are commonly associated with shellfish and have been increasingly implicated in human gastrointestinal disease. We report the first case of human bacteremia with Malacobacter (previously Arcobacter) mytili acquired after exposure to Maryland crab. Arcobacter spp. should be considered in febrile illnesses when the history indicates exposure to seafood.

7.
J Hosp Med ; 12(5): 323-328, 2017 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28459900

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Increasing use of testing among hospitalized patients has resulted in an increase in radiologic incidental findings (IFs), which challenge the provision of high-value care in the hospital setting. OBJECTIVE: To understand impact of radiologic incidental findings on resource utilization in patients hospitalized with chest pain. DESIGN: Retrospective observational cross sectional study. SETTING: Academic medical center. PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients hospitalized with principal diagnosis of chest pain. MEASUREMENTS: Demographic, imaging, and length of stay (LOS) data were abstracted from the medical charts. We used multiple logistic regression to evaluate factors associated with radiologic IFs and negative binomial regression to evaluate the association between radiologic IFs and LOS. RESULTS: 1811 consecutive admissions with chest pain were analyzed retrospectively over a period of 24 months; 376 patients were included in the study after exclusion criteria were applied and readmissions removed. Of these, 197 patients (52%) had 364 new radiologic IFs on imaging; most IFs were of minor (50%) or moderate clinical significance (42%), with only 7% of major significance. Odds of finding radiologic IFs increased with age (adjusted odds ratio, 1.04; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.06) and was associated with a 26% increase in LOS (adjusted incidence rate ratio, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.07-1.49). CONCLUSION: Radiologic IFs were very common among patients hospitalized with chest pain of suspected cardiac origin and independently associated with an increase in the LOS. Interventions to address radiologic IFs may reduce LOS and, thereby, support high-value care. Journal of Hospital Medicine 2017;12:323-328.


Subject(s)
Chest Pain/diagnostic imaging , Health Resources/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals, Urban/statistics & numerical data , Incidental Findings , Patient Admission , Radiology Department, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Chest Pain/therapy , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Health Resources/trends , Hospitals, Urban/trends , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Admission/trends , Radiology Department, Hospital/trends , Retrospective Studies
8.
South Med J ; 110(1): 76-77, 2017 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28052182
9.
South Med J ; 109(3): 185-90, 2016 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26954658

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: In 2008, the American Heart Association and the American College of Cardiology released guidelines for the management of cocaine-induced myocardial infarction (CIMI). We hypothesized that CIMI patients are likely to receive less invasive and more conservative management than patients with MI without history of cocaine use. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis on patients younger than 65 years presenting with acute MI between April 1, 2008 and December 31, 2012. Patients were classified as cocaine-negative MI or CIMI based on either urine toxicology results or self-reported cocaine use. Categorical and continuous variables were compared using χ(2) or t test as appropriate. The primary outcome was cardiac catheterization or stress testing. The secondary outcome was a 30-day readmission rate for major adverse cardiovascular events. Multiple logistic regression models calculated odds ratios (ORs) for the primary outcomes adjusting for patient demographics and comorbidities. RESULTS: Of 378 MI patients, 4.2 % had CIMI. CIMI patients were younger (50 vs 54 years; P < 0.01) predominantly African American (56% vs 16%, P < 0.01), and mostly active smokers (88% vs 58%, P = 0.02). They were more likely to receive stress testing (adjusted OR 3.61, 95% confidence interval 1.04-12.53) and less likely to undergo cardiac catheterization (adjusted OR 0.12, 95% confidence interval 0.03-0.45). The 30-day readmission rate for major adverse cardiovascular events was higher in CIMI compared with cocaine-negative MI patients (38% vs 13%; P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: The use of cocaine in patients presenting with acute MI appears to impact management decisions of providers. Patient-centered postdischarge arrangements need better coordination for this patient group to optimize their follow-up care.


Subject(s)
Cocaine-Related Disorders/complications , Myocardial Infarction/chemically induced , Black or African American , Cardiac Catheterization , Cohort Studies , Exercise Test , Female , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis , Myocardial Infarction/therapy , Patient Readmission , Recurrence , Retrospective Studies , Smoking
10.
Obstet Gynecol ; 120(2 Pt 2): 506-507, 2012 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22825281

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Neovaginal reconstruction surgeries are associated with long-term complications. One such complication is restenosis. CASE: A 57-year-old woman with cecal neovaginal reconstruction after stenosis from vulvovaginal lichen planus 11 years previously presented with abdominal pain and mass. The mass was from distension of the neovaginal cecum attributable to accumulation of secretions secondary to neovaginal restenosis. This was successfully drained to relieve her symptoms. CONCLUSION: No current guidelines exist on managing or evaluating neovaginas for long-term complications, but annual speculum vaginal examinations may aid in diagnosing complications early.


Subject(s)
Abdomen/pathology , Abdominal Pain/diagnosis , Lichen Planus/surgery , Plastic Surgery Procedures , Vaginal Diseases/surgery , Cecum/surgery , Constriction, Pathologic/diagnosis , Constriction, Pathologic/surgery , Female , Humans , Lichen Planus/pathology , Middle Aged , Reoperation , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Vagina/surgery , Vaginal Diseases/pathology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...