The impact of systematic review of status 7 patients on the kidney transplant waitlist.

BACKGROUND: Increased morbidity and mortality are well documented in Status 7(inactive list) patients. Delays in transplantation secondary to prolonged periods on inactive status also negatively impacts transplant outcomes. We developed an effective system to reduce the proportion of status 7 patients on our kidney transplant waitlist. This can easily be reproduced by other transplant centers since concerns about Status 7 list size are commonplace. METHODS: Meetings of a dedicated status 7 focus group were undertaken biweekly beginning in April 2016, each lasting for 1 hour or less. The group was led by a transplant physician and comprised of members from all disciplines of the kidney transplant department. Individual patient barriers to activation were systematically evaluated and action plans were developed to overcome those. The formal meetings were supplemented by updates to an electronic database accessible to all members of the team. RESULTS: In the first 2 years of the program, we were able to activate and eventually transplant 18% of the formerly inactive patients. Forty percent of all inactive patients were removed from the waitlist due to one or more unsurmountable barriers. The median time patients stayed inactive on the waitlist was shortened from 1344 days at the start of this initiative to 581 days at the end. CONCLUSION: This strategy of systematic reevaluation of status 7 patients resulted in successful disposition of a substantial number of inactive patients. Further, waitlist time was reduced and transplantation expedited for the appropriate individuals. This approach could easily be adapted by other transplant centers with minimum utilization of resources.

Effect of steroid-free low concentration calcineurin inhibitor maintenance immunosuppression regimen on renal allograft histopathology and function.

BACKGROUND: The most common cause of late kidney transplant failure is insidiously progressive renal dysfunction associated with organ scarring and fibrosis. Advanced donor age, delayed graft function, calcineurin toxicity and repeated acute rejection episodes are risk factors for this pathophysiology. METHODS: We employed 3, 12 and 24 months surveillance renal biopsies, scored using the Chronic Allograft Damage Index (CADI), with periodic estimates of glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) to assess the effect of a steroid-free maintenance immunosuppression regimen on allograft histology and function. Ninety-one patients were induced with Alemtuzumab and then treated with mycophenolate sodium and low trough concentrations of tacrolimus. RESULTS: Fifty-six of 91 patients followed for 24 months showed no clinical rejection and in 16 more only minimal histological or borderline changes as defined by Banff criteria were observed. Histologically acute rejection was observed in 14 patients including two detected on surveillance biopsy. Five patients refused biopsies but showed stable eGFR for 24 months. Graft histopathology in the group with no rejection did not worsen. In contrast, nearly half the patients with acute rejection showed progression of CADI scores and a total of four grafts were lost over the 2 years. The 16 patients with borderline rejection changes exhibited stable glomerular filtration rate throughout, but 12.5% showed progression of CADI scores in the 12- to 24-month period. CONCLUSIONS: Following Alemtuzumab induction and in conjunction with low-dose tacrolimus and mycophenolate, continuous steroid therapy was not required to prevent progressive injury or preservation of graft function in patients without biopsy-proven acute rejection. Scored surveillance renal biopsies provide a useful tool to monitor transplanted kidneys.