From dyspepsia to complicated peptic ulcer: new markers in diagnosis and prognosis.

OBJECTIVE: Peptic ulcer disease (PUD) may present with different clinical findings, ranging from mild dyspeptic complaints to mortal complications, such as gastrointestinal system perforation. The aim of this study was to investigate the potential blood parameters that can be used in the diagnosis of PUD and prediction of complications. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 80 patients with dyspeptic complaints, 83 patients with PUD, and 108 patients with peptic ulcer perforation (PUP) who were treated in our hospital between January 2017 and December 2020 were included in the study. Clinical findings, laboratory data, and imaging methods were reviewed retrospectively. RESULTS: The mean age of 271 (154 men, 117 women) patients included in the study was 56.04 ± 17.98 (mean ± standard deviation) years. The neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), mean platelet volume, white blood cell, C-reactive protein, and neutrophil values were higher in patients with PUP compared to other groups (p < 0.001 for all). In the PUD group, only red blood cell distribution width was significantly higher compared to the patient group with dyspeptic complaints. In the postoperative period, NLR and PLR were significantly higher in patients who developed severe complications according to the Clavien-Dindo classification compared to patients who developed mild complications. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that simple blood parameters can be used as diagnostic markers at different stages of PUD. NLR and PLR can be helpful in the diagnosis of PUP and red blood cell distribution width can be used to differentiate patients with peptic ulcer from dyspeptic patients. Additionally, NLR and PLR can be used to predict serious postoperative complications after PUP surgery.

Vessel sealing system vs. conventional knot-tying for hilar dissection during living donor hepatectomy: a prospective, randomized, double-blinded study.

OBJECTIVE: LT has become the gold standard treatment for many liver diseases, especially chronic liver disease. A commonly seen problem, even in donors who do not develop any major complications after living donor hepatectomy (LDH), is the persistent drainage of lymphatic fluid from the hepatectomy site drain, which causes extensive hospitalization and consequent loss to the workforce. To our knowledge, no study has yet been published comparing LVSS and conventional knot-tying methods for hilar dissection, which is an important stage of the LDH procedure. We aimed to prospectively compare the outcomes of these two treatment methods. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Donor candidates were divided into two groups: conventional suture tying (conventional knot tying group; n=34) and Ligasure vessel sealing system (LVSS; n=34). A simple randomization method of drawing lots was used to assign the patients to each group. The following parameters were analyzed for all patients: age, gender, BMI, duration of surgery, postoperative drainage amounts, drain removal times and complications, length of hospital stay, morbidity, and mortality. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in terms of operative times, postoperative drainage levels, hospital stay or drain removal times. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the use of LVSS in LDH was found to be safe, although it did not offer any advantage over conventional methods. Nevertheless, it seems probable that the use of LVSS could reduce operative time and amounts of lymphatic drainage, especially in centers with minimal experience with LDH, such as new LDH centers.

Perioperative goal-directed fluid management using noninvasive hemodynamic monitoring in gynecologic oncology.

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative fluid management is important for the prevention of perioperative morbidity and mortality. Our study aimed to investigate the perioperative feasibility and benefits of Goal-Directed Fluid Management (GDFM) using noninvasive hemodynamic monitoring in gynecologic oncology patients with acute blood loss and severe fluid loss. We assessed the effects of GDFM on hemodynamics, organ perfusion, complications, and mortality outcomes. METHODS: This randomized prospective study included 104 patients over the age of 18 years, including 56 patients with endometrial cancer and 48 patients with ovarian cancer who had open surgery. The anesthetic approach was standardized for all patients. We compared the perioperative results of the subjects who were randomized into GDFM (n = 51) and Liberal Fluid Management (LFM) (n = 53) groups using a computer program. RESULTS: The median perioperative crystalloid replacement (2000 vs. 2700; p < 0.001) and total volume of fluid (2260 vs. 3200; p < 0.001) were lower in the GDFM group compared to the LFM group. The hemodynamic findings and the HCO3 and lactate levels of the GDFM group did not significantly change perioperatively. The heart rate, mean arterial pressure, and HCO3 levels of the LFM group decreased and serum lactate levels increased perioperatively. The hospitalization rate in ICU (7.8% vs. 28.3%; p = 0.010), rate of patients with comorbidity conditions indicated in ICU (2% vs. 17%; p = 0.024), and rate of complications (17.6% vs. 35.8%; p = 0.047) were lower in the GDFM group compared to the LFM group. CONCLUSION: The amount of intraoperatively administered crystalloid solution and complication rates were significantly lower in gynecologic oncologic surgery patients who received GDFM. Besides, hemodynamic findings, and lactate levels of the GDFM group did not change significantly during the perioperative period.

Non-invasive fibrosis tests are correlated with necroinflammatory actvity of liver in patients with chronic hepatitis B.

BACKGROUND: The gold standarda method used for assessing necroinflammatory activity and fibrosis in the liver is a liver biopsy which has many disadvantages. Therefore, many investigators have been trying to develop non-invasive tests for predicting liver fibrosis score (LFS) of these patients. The aim of this study is to describe the relationship between certain non-invasive fibrosis markers with LFS and histological activity index (HAI) detected histopathologically by liver biopsy in chronic hepatitis B patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 54 patients who had undergone a liver biopsy with the diagnosis of chronic HBV infection were included in the study. Ishak scoring was used for the evaluation of liver fibrosis, and a modified Knodell HAI was used for demonstration of necroinflammation. In this study, non-invasive fibrosis tests were calculated as described in previous studies. RESULTS: Histological acitivity index was positively correlated with age, age/platelet index, cirrhosis discriminant score (CDS), AST/platelet ratio index (APRI), AST/platelet/GGT/AFP index (APGA), fibro-quotient (Fibro-Q), Goteburg University Cirrhosis Index (Guci), and Platelet/Age/Phosphatase/AFP/AST index (PAPAS). When divided into two groups according to HAI, Guci and APGA were found significantly different both in >4 and >4 HAI groups than the other group. In ROC analysis performed for LFS; PAPAS, APGA, FFI and APRI were the markers having the highest AUC levels, and in ROC analysis performed for HAI; Guci, APRI and APGA were the markers with the highest AUC levels. CONCLUSIONS: APRI, APGA and GUCI tests may be helpful in prediction of necroinflammatory scores in the liver.