Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
2.
J Exp Orthop ; 8(1): 15, 2021 Feb 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33629206

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare intrathecal 1% chloroprocaine with 2% hyperbaric prilocaine in the setting of ambulatory knee arthroscopy. We hypothesized that complete resolution of the sensory block was faster with chloroprocaine. METHODS: Eighty patients scheduled for knee arthroscopy were included in this prospective randomized double-blind study. Spinal anesthesia was performed with either chloroprocaine (50 mg) or hyperbaric prilocaine (50 mg). Characteristics of sensory and motor blocks and side effects were recorded. RESULTS: Mean time to full sensory block recovery was shorter with chloroprocaine (169 (56.1) min vs 248 (59.4)). The characteristics of the sensory blocks were similar at the T12 dermatome level between the two groups. Differences appeared at T10: the percentage of patients with a sensory block was higher, onset quicker and duration longer with hyperbaric prilocaine. The number of patients with a sensory block at T4 dermatome level in both groups was minimal. Times to full motor recovery were identical in both groups (85 (70-99) vs 86 (76-111) min). Time to spontaneous voiding was shorter with chloroprocaine (203 (57.6) min vs 287.3 (47.2) min). Incidence of side effects was low in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: When considering the characteristics of the sensory block, the use of chloroprocaine may allow an earlier discharge of patients. Cephalic extension was to a higher dermatomal level and the sensory block at T10 level was of prolonged duration with hyperbaric prilocaine, suggesting that the choice between the two drugs should also be performed based on the level of the sensory block requested by the surgery. This study is registered in the US National Clinical Trials Registry, registration number: NCT030389 , the first of February 2017, Retrospectively registered.

3.
Acta Anaesthesiol Belg ; 64(3): 105-8, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24279199

ABSTRACT

These guidelines, made by BARA, are, like the "Safety First Guidelines" of the SARB, clinical recomendations for a good and safe practice when performing peripheral nerve blocks (PNB). These recommendations were made according to the most recent literature and experts opinion and are therefore prone to changes due to evolution of literature. The guidelines deal with "Informed Consent", preoperative visit, monitoring, equipment and the PNB procedure itself regardless of using ultrasound or neurostimultion or both. Advise is given when combining a PNB with general anesthesia and when a catheter technique is used.


Subject(s)
Nerve Block/standards , Peripheral Nerves/physiology , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Adult , Humans
4.
Acta Chir Belg ; 107(5): 548-50, 2007.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18074917

ABSTRACT

The classic procedure for aortobifemoral bypass is open surgery. Since the first totally laparoscopic aortobifemoral bypass reported in 1997 by Yves-Marie Dion, laparoscopy has been accepted by several authors as a possible minimally invasive alternative for aorto-iliac occlusive disease. The transperitoneal left retrocolic and retrorenal ways are generally used. The totally retroperitoneal laparoscopic procedure has been described as an alternative to the transperitoneal approach. We report here a totally laparoscopic retroperitoneal approach to performing aortobifemoral bypass. This approach was proposed to a 51-year-old man with aorto-iliac occlusive disease. There was no indication for endovascular revascularization. The patient suffered from 10 metres of bilateral intermittent claudication and lower limb ulcers. During the surgical procedure our patient was placed in a 30-degree right lateral decubitus position. The optical system was first placed in an intra-abdominal position to check the positioning of the trocars in the left retroperitoneal space. The dissection of the retroperitoneal space was performed by CO2 insufflation and by blunt dissection using laparoscopic forceps. The infrarenal aorta was exposed and clamped by laparoscopic clamps. A bifurcated graft was sutured on the left-hand side of the aorta by a running suture. Both prosthetic limbs were tunnelized retroperitoneally to the groin under optical control. The femoral anastomoses were performed by classic open surgery.


Subject(s)
Aortic Diseases/surgery , Arterial Occlusive Diseases/surgery , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/methods , Iliac Artery , Endarterectomy , Humans , Laparoscopy , Male , Middle Aged , Retroperitoneal Space , Suture Techniques
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...