ABSTRACT
Pacemakers use heart rate histograms (% beats) and sensor indicated rate histograms (% time) to illustrate rate distributions. When programmed to the rate adaptive modes, these data are used to determine the appropriateness of rate response to activity. These histograms are generated from instantaneous heart rate calculations. In humans, such data are compared to known histographic rate profiles. Such rate profiles during 24 h in the dog are not available. Moreover, data representation differ between Holter monitoring and pacemakers making comparisons challenging. The rate distribution in dogs >7-years of age was determined over 24 h using instantaneous and rolling average heart rate. Such data could serve as a guide to programming pacing rates for dogs. Sinus arrhythmia resulted in dissimilar heart rate profiles depending on the method of determining rate. The long intervals of sinus arrhythmia resulted in median values for the percent of time with an instantaneous heart rate of <50 beats/min (bpm) of 15%, whereas a rolling average heart rate of <50 bpm was 0.2%. Based on the cumulative time of the rolling average rate, dogs spent 26.3% of the day between 70-90 bpm with rates <65 bpm and >90 bpm approximating 30% for each. Rates >160 bpm were uncommon (<1%). However, high variability existed between dogs. This study demonstrated the shortcomings of both instantaneous and averaging methods to evaluate heart rate profiles in the dog and that both methods should be incorporated when making pacing rate decisions during programming.
