Application of intraoperative evoked potential monitoring in patients with anterior cerebral artery aneurysms.

OBJECTIVES: The location of the aneurysm can affect the relationship between changes in intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring indicators and postoperative outcomes. The current study aimed to evaluate the application value of motor evoked potential and somatosensory evoked potential monitoring in anterior cerebral artery aneurysm surgery. METHODS: The data of 219 patients with anterior cerebral artery aneurysms treated via surgical clipping were retrospectively reviewed. The correlation of motor/somatosensory evoked potential monitoring with postoperative motor dysfunction was assessed using false positive rate, false negative rate, sensitivity, and specificity. Binary multivariate logistic regression analysis was applied to identify potential predictors for postoperative motor dysfunction. RESULTS: Motor evoked potential monitoring showed satisfactory effectiveness in predicting postoperative motor dysfunction (Sensitivity, 60.00%; Specificity, 85.43%; False positive rate, 14.57%; False negative rate, 40%). While somatosensory evoked potential did not (Sensitivity, 15.00%; Specificity, 96.98%; False positive rate, 3.02%; False negative rate, 85%). Abnormal motor evoked potential was identified as the only independent predictor for both short-term (odds ratio, 8.893; 95% confidence interval, 2.749-28.773; p<0.001) and long-term postoperative motor dysfunction (odds ratio, 7.877; 95% confidence interval, 2.144-28.945; p=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: During intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring for patients with anterior cerebral artery aneurysms, paying more attention to motor evoked potential changes was a reasonable choice. And somatosensory evoked potential monitoring can serve as an auxiliary reference.

Efficacy of evoked potential monitoring for predicting postoperative motor status in internal carotid artery aneurysm surgeries.

This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of intraoperative motor evoked potential (MEP) and somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) monitoring for predicting postoperative motor deficits (PMDs) in patients with internal carotid artery (ICA) aneurysms. The data for 138 patients with ICA aneurysms who underwent surgical clipping as well as their intraoperative neuromonitoring data were retrospectively reviewed. The efficacy of MEP/SSEP changes for predicting PMDs was assessed using binary logistic regression analysis. Subsequently, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to obtain a supplementary critical value of the MEP/SSEP deterioration duration. The sensitivity and specificity of MEP changes for predicting PMDs were 0.824 and 0.843, respectively. For SSEP changes, the sensitivity and specificity were 0.529 and 0.959, respectively. MEP and SSEP changes were identified as independent predictors for short-term (p = 0.002 and 0.011, respectively) and long-term PMDs (p = 0.040 and 0.006, respectively). The supplementary critical value for MEP deterioration duration for predicting PMDs was 14 min (p = 0.007, AUC = 0.805). For SSEP, the value was 14.5 min (p = 0.042, AUC = 0.875). The MEP/SSEP changes adjusted by those optimal values were also identified as independent predictors for short-term (p < 0.001 and p = 0.005, respectively) and long-term PMDs (p = 0.019 and 0.003, respectively). Intraoperative MEP and SSEP deterioration durations are effective in predicting PMDs in patients with ICA aneurysms.

Effects of Sevoflurane-Propofol-Balanced Anesthesia on Flash Visual Evoked Potential Monitoring in Spine Surgery: A Randomized Noninferiority Trial.

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative flash visual evoked potential (FVEP) can be used to monitor visual function during spine surgery. However, it is limited due to the previous perception of its sensitivity to inhalation anesthesia. We conducted this trial to test the noninferiority of sevoflurane-propofol-balanced anesthesia (BA) versus popular propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) on the amplitude of FVEP during spine surgery. METHODS: A total of 60 patients undergoing spine surgery were randomized to receive either sevoflurane-propofol-balanced anesthesia (BA group) or propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA group) for anesthesia maintenance. We titrated the propofol plasma concentration to keep the bispectral index (BIS) values between 40 and 50. The primary outcome was the P100-N145 amplitudes of FVEP at 120 minutes after induction of anesthesia. The noninferiority margin (δ) was defined as 10% of the P100-N145 amplitude at 120 minutes after induction in the TIVA group. If the confidence interval (CI) for mean differences of P100-N145 amplitude at 120 minutes after induction between BA and TIVA groups lied above the lower limit of -δ with P < .025, we defined BA group was noninferior to TIVA group. RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients were included in the final analysis. The amplitude of P100-N145 at 120 minutes after anesthesia induction in group BA was noninferior to group TIVA (3.8 [1.3] µV vs 3.2 [1.6] µV, -δ = -0.32, mean difference, 0.57, 95% CI, -0.18 to 1.33, P for noninferiority = .015). CONCLUSIONS: The effect of 0.5 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) of sevoflurane-propofol-balanced anesthesia on the P100-N145 amplitude of FVEP was noninferior to that of propofol-based TIVA under comparable BIS range.

Prediction of Post-operative Visual Deterioration Using Visual-Evoked Potential Latency in Extended Endoscopic Endonasal Resection of Craniopharyngiomas.

Background: The current study aimed to investigate the predictive value of visual-evoked potential (VEP) latency for post-operative visual deterioration in patients undergoing craniopharyngioma resection via extended endoscopic endonasal approach (EEEA). Methods: Data from 90 patients who underwent craniopharyngioma resection via EEEA with intraoperative VEP monitoring were retrospectively reviewed. P100 latency was compared between patients with and without post-operative visual deterioration, and the threshold value of P100 latency for predicting post-operative visual deterioration was calculated by the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. In addition, other potential prognostic factors regarding post-operative visual outcomes were also analyzed by multivariate analysis. Results: Patients with post-operative visual deterioration showed a significantly longer VEP latency than those without (p < 0.001). An extension over 8.61% in VEP latency was identified as a predictor of post-operative visual deterioration (p < 0.001). By contrast, longer preoperative visual impairment duration and larger tumor volume were not significant predictors for post-operative visual deterioration. Conclusions: The current study revealed that intraoperative VEP monitoring in EEEA is effective for predicting post-operative visual deterioration, and an extension over 8.61% in VEP latency can be used as a critical cut-off value to predict post-operative visual deterioration.

Intraoperative motor and somatosensory evoked potential monitoring during surgical clipping of ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a comparative study.

OBJECTIVE: The current study investigated the correlation between intraoperative motor evoked potential (MEP) and somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) monitoring and both short-term and long-term motor outcomes in aneurysm patients treated with surgical clipping. Moreover, the authors provide a relatively optimal neurophysiological predictor of postoperative motor deficits (PMDs) in patients with ruptured and unruptured aneurysms. METHODS: A total of 1017 patients (216 with ruptured aneurysms and 801 with unruptured aneurysms) were included. Patient demographic characteristics, clinical features, intraoperative monitoring data, and follow-up data were retrospectively reviewed. The efficacy of using changes in MEP/SSEP to predict PMDs was assessed using binary logistic regression analysis. Subsequently, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to determine the optimal critical value for duration of MEP/SSEP deterioration. RESULTS: Both intraoperative MEP and SSEP monitoring were significantly effective for predicting short-term (p < 0.001 for both) and long-term (p < 0.001 for both) PMDs in aneurysm patients. The critical values for predicting short-term PMDs were amplitude decrease rates of 57.30% for MEP (p < 0.001 and area under the curve [AUC] 0.732) and 64.10% for SSEP (p < 0.001 and AUC 0.653). In patients with an unruptured aneurysm, the optimal critical values for predicting short-term PMDs were durations of deterioration of 17 minutes for MEP (p < 0.001 and AUC 0.768) and 21 minutes for SSEP (p < 0.001 and AUC 0.843). In patients with a ruptured aneurysm, the optimal critical values for predicting short-term PMDs were durations of deterioration of 12.5 minutes for MEP (p = 0.028 and AUC 0.706) and 11 minutes for SSEP (p = 0.043 and AUC 0.813). CONCLUSIONS: The authors found that both intraoperative MEP and SSEP monitoring are useful for predicting short-term and long-term PMDs in patients with unruptured and ruptured aneurysms. The optimal intraoperative neuromonitoring method for predicting PMDs varies depending on whether the aneurysm has ruptured or not.

Prediction of postoperative motor deficits using intraoperative motor-evoked potentials in middle cerebral artery aneurysm.

To explore the relationship between postoperative motor deficits and the duration of reduced motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) in patients with middle cerebral artery (MCA) aneurysm. This study included 285 cases of MCA aneurysm treated with clipping surgery with MEP monitoring. The effects of MEP changes on postoperative motor function were assessed, and the key time point for minimizing the incidence of postoperative motor dysfunction was found through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Motor dysfunction was significantly associated with the occurrence of MEP changes, and patients with irreversible changes were more likely to suffer motor dysfunction than were those with reversible changes. The critical duration of MEP changes that minimized the risk of postoperative motor dysfunction was 8.5 min. This study revealed that MEP monitoring is an effective method for preventing ischemic brain injury during surgical treatment of MCA aneurysm and proposes a critical cutoff for the duration of MEP deterioration of 8.5 min for predicting postoperative motor dysfunction.

A prediction of postoperative neurological deficits following intracranial aneurysm surgery using somatosensory evoked potential deterioration duration.

Although the application of somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) in intracranial aneurysm surgery has been well demonstrated, the relationship between the duration of SSEP deterioration and postoperative neurological deficits (PNDs) is still not clear. The objectives of this study were (1) to detect the relationship between the SSEP deterioration duration and PND; and (2) detect the relationship between SSEP deterioration duration and postoperative computed tomography (CT) findings. Data from 587 patients were reviewed and 40 patients with SSEP deterioration were enrolled. Four patients presented irreversible disappearance and 36 patients presented reversible deterioration (including 9 [25%] patients with reversible reduction and 27 [75%] patients with reversible disappearance). In the patients with reversible SSEP deterioration, 17 patients had PNDs, and the SSEP deterioration duration was 42 ± 46 min, ranging from 5 to 180 min. Nineteen patients did not have PNDs, and their duration of SSEP deterioration was 11 ± 9 min (range 2-40 min). The SSEP deterioration duration significantly differed between patients with or without PND (P < 0.01). Eleven minutes is the optimal cut-off value of motor evoked potential change duration avoiding PND (area under the curve = 0.84). Patients with a SSEP deteriorating duration > 11 min had a significant higher incidence rate of abnormal CT finding postoperatively (p < 0.05). According to these results, we conclude that the duration of SSEP deterioration is extremely important to postoperative neurological function, and in order to avoid PND, the SSEP deterioration duration must not exceed 10 min. The SSEP deterioration duration is also associated with postoperative CT findings.

A comprehensive comparison of posterior lumbar interbody fusion versus posterolateral fusion for the treatment of isthmic and degenerative spondylolisthesis: A meta-analysis of prospective studies.

Posterolateral fusion (PLF) and posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) are both frequently-used procedures for the surgical treatment of isthmic and degenerative spondylolisthesis. The current meta-analysis aimed to perform a comprehensive comparison between PLF and PLIF in terms of the therapeutic effects on spondylolisthesis. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for relevant prospective studies. Measures of clinical outcome, postoperative complication rate, fusion rate, and blood loss are presented as odds ratio (OR), mean difference and corresponding 95 % confidence interval (CI) as appropriate. Eight prospective studies comprising 723 patients were eventually enrolled in the meta-analysis. Patients who underwent PLIF had a better clinical outcome (pooled OR, 1.63 [95 % CI, 1.02-2.61]; p = 0.04) and a higher fusion rate (pooled OR, 3.33 [95 % CI, 1.88-5.90]; p < 0.01) than those who underwent PLF. No significant difference between the two procedures was identified for postoperative complication rate and blood loss. The results showed that PLIF was superior to PLF in clinical outcome and fusion rate, and equal to PLF in terms of blood loss and the rate of postoperative complications. Here we provide the most effective evidence currently available for the comparison between PLF and PLIF, which has guiding significance for clinical practice.

Prediction of postoperative motor deficits using motor evoked potential deterioration duration in intracranial aneurysm surgery.

OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to investigate the predictive value of motor evoked potential (MEP) deterioration duration for postoperative motor deficits in patients undergoing intracranial aneurysm surgery. METHODS: Data from 587 patients were reviewed and 92 patients with MEP deterioration were enrolled. MEP deterioration duration was compared between patients with and without postoperative motor deficits. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to define the threshold value for predicting postoperative motor deficit risk. Additionally, the association between MEP deterioration duration and postoperative CT findings was explored. RESULTS: Patients with postoperative motor deficits had a significantly longer MEP deterioration duration (p < 0.01). An MEP deterioration duration greater than or equal to 13 min was identified as an independent predictor of immediate (p < 0.01), short-term (p < 0.01), and long-term postoperative motor deficits (p < 0.05). There was no significant association between MEP deterioration duration and new CT abnormalities. CONCLUSION: MEP deterioration duration could be used for predicting intracranial aneurysm surgical outcome. SIGNIFICANCE: The study first proposed a threshold value of MEP deterioration duration (13 min) for predicting the risk of postoperative motor deficits in patients undergoing intracranial aneurysm surgery.

Neuronavigation-Guided Corticospinal Tract Mapping in Brainstem Tumor Surgery: Better Preservation of Motor Function.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a new technique in brainstem surgery, neuronavigation (NN)-guided corticospinal tract (CST) mapping, in a retrospective study of patients undergoing brainstem tumor surgery. METHODS: We studied 40 patients with a brainstem tumor who were enrolled in this study. Patients whose worst preoperative muscle strength of the 4 limbs was greater than 3 levels from normal on the Lovett scale were divided into 2 groups: a treatment group of 21 patients who underwent NN-guided CST mapping and routine intraoperative neurophysiology monitoring (IONM) and a control group of 19 patients who underwent routine NN and IONM. Preoperative muscle strength and postoperative (day 90 postsurgery) muscle strength were assessed and compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS: In the NN-guided CST mapping group, 3 patients (14.3%) had a decrease in muscle strength by 1 level postoperatively, and no patient experienced a decrease of >1 level. In the control group, 4 patients (21.1%) had a 1-level decrease in muscle strength, and 5 (26.3%) had a decrease of >1 level. Patients in the NN-guided CST mapping group had significantly better surgical outcomes compared with those in the control group (P = 0.018, Fisher exact test). CONCLUSIONS: Brainstem tumor resection using NN-guided CST mapping achieved better preservation of motor function compared with routine NN and IONM. NN-guided CST mapping not only decreased the difficulty of the surgery, but also significantly improved the efficiency of surgery.