Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Language
Publication year range
1.
BMC Surg ; 23(1): 76, 2023 Mar 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36997968

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In order to improve the clinical medical technology, enhance the clinical effect and improve the disease detection rate, the clinical incidence rate of atlantoaxial dislocation and vertebral body malformation that are difficult to summarize is increasing year by year. METHODS: A total of 80 patients with atlantoaxial dislocation deformity treated in our hospital from January 2017 to May 2021 are selected for this study. According to the number table method, 80 patients are randomly divided into the auxiliary group and the traditional group, with 40 cases in each group. The traditional group is treated with posterior atlantoaxial pedicle screw system internal fixation and intervertebral fusion, and the auxiliary implementation and application of a new head and neck fixation and traction device through nasal cannula and oral release decompression fixation for posterior fusion. The patients in the two groups are compared changes and differences in efficacy, spinal cord function index, pain score, surgery, and quality of life. RESULTS: Compared with the traditional group, the total clinical effective rate, cervical spine extension and flexion range of motion, physical function, physical function, psychological function, and social function in the auxiliary group are significantly improved. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and VAS score are significantly reduced (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The new head and neck fixation traction device can improve the surgical efficacy and quality of life of patients with irreversible atlantoaxial dislocation, enhance spinal cord function, reduce pain symptoms and surgical risks, and is worthy of clinical application.


Subject(s)
Joint Dislocations , Spinal Fusion , Humans , Traction , Quality of Life , Joint Dislocations/surgery , Cervical Vertebrae/surgery , Fracture Fixation, Internal , Treatment Outcome , Spinal Fusion/methods
2.
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992) ; 65(6): 779-785, 2019 Jul 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31340304

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy and safety of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (PTED) in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) combined with osteoporosis. METHODS: Eighty patients with LSS combined with osteoporosis were divided into a control and PTED group, which received conventional transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and PTED, respectively. The surgical indications, incision visual analogue scale (VAS), lumbar and leg pain VAS, lumbar Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) and Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores, bone mineral density (BMD), and adverse reactions were observed. RESULTS: Compared with the control group, in the PTED group, the operation time, bleeding loss and hospitalization duration, incision VAS scores at postoperative 12, 24 and 48 h and lumbar and leg pain VAS and lumbar ODI scores on postoperative 6 months were significantly decreased (P < 0.01), and the lumbar JOA score on postoperative 6 months was significantly increased (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in BMD between two groups (P > 0.05). Compared with the control group, in the PTED group, the total effective rate was significantly higher (P < 0.05), and the incidence of adverse reactions was significantly lower (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: PTED is safe and effective in the treatment of LSS combined with osteoporosis.


Subject(s)
Diskectomy, Percutaneous/methods , Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery , Osteoporosis/surgery , Spinal Stenosis/surgery , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Bone Density , Disability Evaluation , Diskectomy, Percutaneous/standards , Humans , Middle Aged , Osteoporosis/complications , Postoperative Care , Reproducibility of Results , Spinal Stenosis/complications , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Visual Analog Scale
3.
Rev. Assoc. Med. Bras. (1992) ; 65(6): 779-785, June 2019. graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1012995

ABSTRACT

SUMMARY OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy and safety of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (PTED) in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) combined with osteoporosis. METHODS: Eighty patients with LSS combined with osteoporosis were divided into a control and PTED group, which received conventional transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and PTED, respectively. The surgical indications, incision visual analogue scale (VAS), lumbar and leg pain VAS, lumbar Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) and Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores, bone mineral density (BMD), and adverse reactions were observed. RESULTS: Compared with the control group, in the PTED group, the operation time, bleeding loss and hospitalization duration, incision VAS scores at postoperative 12, 24 and 48 h and lumbar and leg pain VAS and lumbar ODI scores on postoperative 6 months were significantly decreased (P < 0.01), and the lumbar JOA score on postoperative 6 months was significantly increased (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in BMD between two groups (P > 0.05). Compared with the control group, in the PTED group, the total effective rate was significantly higher (P < 0.05), and the incidence of adverse reactions was significantly lower (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: PTED is safe and effective in the treatment of LSS combined with osteoporosis.


RESUMO: OBJETIVO: Investigar a eficácia e segurança da discectomia endoscópica percutânea transforaminal (DEPT) no tratamento da estenose lombar (EL) combinada à osteoporose. MÉTODOS: Oitenta pacientes com EL combinada à osteoporose foram divididos entre um grupo de controle e um grupo de DEPT, que receberam tratamento convencional com fusão intersomática lombar transforaminal e DEPT, respectivamente. As indicações cirúrgicas, a escala analógica visual (VAS) da incisão e de dor lombar e nas pernas, os escores lombares de acordo com a Associação Ortopédica Japonesa (JOA) e o Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), a densidade mineral óssea (DMO) e possíveis reações adversas foram observados. RESULTADOS: Em comparação com o grupo de controle, no grupo de DEPT o tempo de operação, a perda de sangue e duração de internação, os escores VAS da incisão no pós-operatório após 12, 24 e 48 h, o VAS para dor lombar e nas pernas e os escores ODI lombares após 6 meses de pós-operatório foram significativamente menores (P < 0,01); já o escore JOA lombar após 6 meses de pós-operatório foi significativamente maior (P < 0,05). Não houve diferença significativa na densidade mineral óssea entre os dois grupos (P > 0,05). Em comparação com o grupo de controle, o grupo de DEPT teve uma taxa efetiva total significativamente maior (P < 0,05), e a incidência de reações adversas foi significativamente menor (P < 0,05). CONCLUSÕES: A discectomia endoscópica percutânea transforaminal é segura e eficaz no tratamento de EL combinada à osteoporose.


Subject(s)
Humans , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Osteoporosis/surgery , Spinal Stenosis/surgery , Diskectomy, Percutaneous/methods , Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery , Osteoporosis/complications , Postoperative Care , Spinal Stenosis/complications , Time Factors , Bone Density , Reproducibility of Results , Treatment Outcome , Diskectomy, Percutaneous/standards , Disability Evaluation , Visual Analog Scale , Middle Aged
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...