ABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate the short-term effect of Pipeline embolization device (PED)for the treatment of unruptured wide-necked intracranial aneurysms. Methods From October 2015 to September 2016,15 consecutive patients with unruptured wide-necked intracranial aneurysm (aneurysm neck and aneurysm body ratio ≥0. 5)treated with PED at the Department of Neurosurgery,the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University were enrolled retrospectively. Their clinical and imaging data were analyzed. Kamran scale was used to evaluate the embolization rate of aneurysms and the changes of the parent arteries. DSA examination was performed again at 6 -12 months after operation. Results Fifteen PED were implanted in 15 patients with unruptured wide-necked intracranial aneurysms,including 13ophthalmic artery aneurysms,1 posterior communicating artery aneurysm,and 1 cavernous sinus aneurysm. The technical success rate was 100% . Immediately after PED implantation,Karman rating of 15 cases were aneurysm grade 2 embolization,parent artery grade A (grade 2a). DSA examination was performed again at 6 - 12 months after operation showed that 14 patients were aneurysm grade 4,parent artery was grade A (grade 4a). One patient (ophthalmic artery aneurysm)underwent the second DSA examinations at 6 and 12 months after operation showed that the residual development of aneurysms. The aneurysm embolization was grade 3, and the parent artery was grade A (grade 3a). No branch artery occlusion was observed. Non of them had neurological deficit. The modified Rankin scale score was 0 in all 15 patients. Conclusion The use of PED in the treatment of unruptured wide-necked intracranial aneurysms has a higher occlusion rate. Its long-term effect still needs further follow-up.
ABSTRACT
Objective To compare the efficacies between interventional embolization and surgical clipping in treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms to provide an evidence‐based basis for selecting the clinical treatment scheme .Methods The related randomized controlled trail(RCT) literatures on the effects of interventional embolization and surgical clipping were retrieved from the databases of Pubmed ,Cochrane ,Medline and Embase .The screening was independently performed by two researchers according to the including and excluding criterion .The occurrence rate of adverse reactions ,postoperative 1‐year mortality rate ,re‐bleeding rate ,occurrence rate of vasospasm and ischemic cerebral infarction served as the measurement indicators .The data were extracted and performed the meta analysis by the RevMan5 .3 software .Results Sixteen RCT literatures were included for conducting analy‐sis ,involving 7 373 patients ,in which 3 092 cases adopted interventional embolization and 4 281 cases adopted surgical clipping .The occurrence rate of adverse events(OR=1 .25 ,95% CI ,1 .12-1 .40 ;P<0 .000 1) and re‐bleeding rate(OR=0 .43 ,95% CI ,0 .28 -0 .66 ;P=0 .000 1) in the interventional embolization group were lower than those in the surgical clipping group ;however ,there were no statistical differences between the interventional embolization group and surgical clipping group in the postoperative 1‐year mortality rate(OR=1 .13 ,95% CI ,0 .92-1 .39 ;P=0 .23) ,incidence rate of vasospasm (OR=1 .41 ,95% CI ,0 .99-2 .02 ;P=0 .06) and incidence rate of ischemic cerebral infarction(OR=0 .66 ,95% CI ,0 .42 -1 .05 ;P=0 .08) .Conclusion The current clinical re‐search evidences indicate that using the interventional embolization in treating ruptured intracranial aneurysms can obviously reduce the occurrence rate of adverse events than the surgical clipping ,but increases the re‐bleeding rate .The postoperative 1‐year mortali‐ty rate ,incidence rate of vasospasm and incidence rate of ischemic cerebral infarction have no obvious difference between these two kinds of operation .
ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the application of ultrasound localization during craniocerebral operations. Methods Thirty-one cases with intracranial space occupying lesion were surgically treated with guidance of ultrasound, which was applied to real-time localization while revealing skull, tracing during operation and evaluation of the operation's effect before locking up the skull. Results In our group, 31 cases were checked using ultrasound localization during operation. Ultrasound could level the lesion's size and position, which was in accordance with the result of CT and MRI before operation. With the application of ultrasound localization, the lesion could be probed exactly. Conclusions Ultrasound localization during operation is simple, effective and secure, and is helpful to enhance the accuracy of the craniocerebral operations, reduce the blindly exploration, shorten the operation time, and what is more important, reduce unnecessary tissue damage of normal brain tissue, which obviously possess much clinical utilization.
