Proximity of percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation needle insertion to surrounding anatomic structures: a cadaveric study.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation is a third-line treatment for overactive bladder and urgency urinary incontinence. During the procedure, a needle is inserted cephalad to the medial malleolus and posterior to the tibia. In recent years, permanent implants and leads have been developed for insertion into the medial ankle via a small incision. There are many important structures present in the medial compartment of the ankle, including the great saphenous vein, saphenous nerve, tibial nerve, posterior tibial vessels, and tendons of the posterior compartment leg muscles. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study was to identify the proximity of the percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation needle placed per Food and Drug Administration-approved device instructions to nearby important anatomic structures. The secondary objectives were to identify the proximity of the tibial nerve to the needle site, identify clinically relevant ankle anatomic structures, and confirm the tibial nerve and posterior tibial vasculature by histologic analysis. STUDY DESIGN: Detailed medial ankle dissections were performed bilaterally on 10 female lightly embalmed anatomic donors (cadavers) obtained from the Willed Body Program at the University of Louisville. A pin was inserted at the percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation needle site, and the medial ankle was minimally dissected so the surrounding anatomic structures were visible but not disrupted. The shortest distance from the pin to the selected structures of the medial ankle region was measured. On completion of each dissection and set of measurements, tissue was harvested for histologic examination. The distances between the pin and each structure were assessed using means and standard deviations. A paired t test was used to assess the difference in the locations between the left and right ankles. Statistical analysis was performed on left-sided, right-sided, and combined measurements. An 80% prediction interval was found to represent the expected range of values for the measurement of a new cadaver or patient, and the 95% confidence interval of the mean was computed to characterize the average distance across all cadavers or patients. RESULTS: The medial ankle of 10 adult female lightly embalmed cadavers were examined bilaterally. Dissections were completed from October 2021 to July 2022. Of note, 80% prediction intervals for the tibial nerve, the posterior tibial artery or vein, and the flexor digitorum longus tendon had a lower range of 0.0 mm from the pin and extending to 12.1, 9.5, and 13.9 mm, respectively. Moreover, 2 of the structures were found to be asymmetrical between the right and left ankles. The great saphenous vein was further from the pin on the left (20.5 mm [standard deviation of 6.4 mm] on the left vs 18.1 mm [standard deviation of 5.3 mm] on the right; P=.04). The calcaneal (Achilles) tendon was further from the pin on the right side (13.2 mm [standard deviation of 6.8 mm] vs 7.9 mm [standard deviation of 6.7 mm]; P=.04). Tibial neurovascular structures were confirmed with microscopic analysis. CONCLUSION: The anatomic structures within the medial ankle lie unexpectedly close to the percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation needle site as noted per Food and Drug Administration-approved device instructions. There is a possibility that some medial ankle structures are not symmetrical. It is crucial that practitioners understand medial ankle anatomy when performing percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation or permanent device insertion.

Comparative analyses of attitude, knowledge, and recollection of preoperative counseling regarding pelvic mesh among women with or without a mesh-related complication.

PURPOSE: Our objective was to compare the recollection of preoperative counseling regarding mesh for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and/or stress urinary incontinence (SUI) among women with or without a mesh-related complication (MRC). We hypothesized that the patients who had MRC would better recollect counseling regarding complications associated with mesh. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study among women who had prior implantation of synthetic, non-absorbable mesh for POP and/or SUI at least 3 months prior who presented with or without a MRC. The primary outcome was the proportion of women who recalled being counseled preoperatively about the risk of mesh exposure. RESULTS: Ninety-six women were included in the final analysis (50 MRC; 46 no MRC). MRC women presented further in time from the index surgery [median 69 months [IQR 26-115] vs 12 months (IQR 6-64), p < 0.01]. After adjustment for time since surgery and age, MRC women were significantly less likely to recall being counseled about the possibility of any MRC [19/50 (38%) vs 32/44 (73%), aOR 0.29, 95% CI 0.11-0.79, p = 0.01]. They were also less likely to report they would undergo the same surgery again 5-point Likert scale [median 3 (IQR 1-4) vs 5 (IQR 3-5), 5-point Likert scale, p < 0.01], less satisfied with their mesh surgery [median 1 (IQR 1-3) vs 5 (IQR 3-5), 5-point Likert scale, p < 0.01] and recommended improved preoperative counseling [27/50 (54%) vs 6/46 (13%), p < 0.01]. CONCLUSION: Women who experienced MRC were less likely to recall being counseled about the possibility of MRC and report more unmet needs regarding perioperative counseling than women without MRC.

Learner Satisfaction and Experience With a High-definition Telescopic Camera During Vaginal Procedures: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare learner satisfaction and experience with a table-mounted, projecting, high-definition telescopic camera system (VITOM) versus traditional learner observation during vaginal surgery. METHODS: Medical student and resident learners were randomized to vaginal surgery observation with or without the use of VITOM. We collected data on learner characteristics and their experience with vaginal surgery. After the surgery, learners completed the faculty/preceptor and working environment domains of the Veterans Affairs Learner's Perceptions Survey (VA LPS). The primary outcome was learners who were "very satisfied" on the VA LPS faculty/preceptor domain. We queried their ability to observe the surgery and satisfaction with learning in the operating room using a 100-mm visual analog scale. RESULTS: Ninety-two learners completed the study (n = 44 VITOM, n = 48 no VITOM). There was no significant difference between groups in the proportion of learners "very satisfied" on the VA LPS faculty/preceptor domain (93.2% VITOM vs 91.5% no VITOM; odds ratio, 1.27; 95% confidence interval, 0.20-9.19; P = 0.99). Learners in the VITOM group were more likely to report ability to see what the main surgeon was doing (93.2% VITOM vs 62.5% no VITOM; odds ratio, 8.02; 95% confidence interval, 2.07-46.32; P < 0.01). Using the visual analog scale, learners in the VITOM group reported higher satisfaction with learning in the operating room (median, 96 [interquartile range, 89-100] VITOM vs median, 80 [interquartile range, 57-98] no VITOM; P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The use of a table-mounted, projecting, telescopic camera system during vaginal surgery showed no difference in learner satisfaction on validated questionnaires but resulted in improved experience and visualization.

Development of a safety zone for rectus abdominis fascia graft harvest based on dissections of the ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric nerves.

BACKGROUND: As a result of the vaginal mesh controversy, surgeons are performing more nonmesh, autologous fascia pubovaginal slings to treat stress urinary incontinence in women. The rectus abdominis fascia is the most commonly harvested site for autologous pubovaginal slings, so it is crucial that surgeons are familiar with the relationship between this graft harvest site and the ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric nerves, which can be injured during this procedure. OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were as follows: (1) to estimate the safest area between the bilateral courses of the ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric nerves in which a rectus abdominis fascia graft could be harvested with minimal risk of injury to these nerves and (2) to determine the location and dimensions of a graft harvest site that maximized graft length while remaining close to the pubic symphysis. STUDY DESIGN: The ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric nerves were dissected bilaterally in 12 unembalmed female anatomical donors. The distances of these nerves to a 10 × 2 cm rectus abdominis fascia graft site located 4 cm above the pubic symphysis were measured. Nerve courses inferior to the graft site were determined for each donor by linearly extrapolating measurement points; analysis was performed with and without extrapolation. Average nerve trajectories were estimated assuming a linear regression function to predict the horizontal measurement as a quadratic function of the vertical distance; 95% confidence bands were also estimated. An estimated safety zone was determined to be the region between all credible nerve bounds. RESULTS: The largest safety zone that was closest to the pubic symphysis was located at 5.4 cm superior to the pubic symphysis. At this location, the inferior border of the graft could measure 9.4 cm in length (4.7 cm bilaterally from the midline). Extrapolated nerve courses below the study graft site yielded a smaller safety zone located 2.7 cm superior to the pubic symphysis, allowing for the inferior border of the graft to be 4.8 cm (2.4 cm bilaterally from the midline). CONCLUSION: A rectus abdominis fascia graft harvested 5.4 cm superior to the pubic symphysis with the inferior border of the graft measuring 9.4 cm in length should minimize injury to the ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric nerves. These dimensions allow for the longest graft while remaining relatively close to the pubic symphysis. The closer a graft is harvested to the pubic symphysis, the smaller in length the graft must be to avoid injury to the ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric nerves.

Money & Menopause: The Relationship Between Socioeconomic Class and Awareness about Menopause in Women in Mumbai, India.

PURPOSE: The primary aim of this study is to determine the awareness regarding menopause and its treatment options among women in Mumbai, India and correlate the same with the social class of the subject. In addition, this study also attempts to identify the attitude of Indian women toward menopause. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted using a self-constructed semi structured questionnaire given to women between the ages of 35 and 55 years, currently residing in Mumbai. The 192 women interviewed were then divided into 6 groups as per Prasad's Socioeconomic Classification (based on per capita monthly income) with 53 % falling in class I and II and 47 % in class III, IV and V. Although the study was conducted primarily at a charitable hospital, no subject was found who fulfilled the Class VI criteria. RESULT: The study shows that two-thirds of class I, four-fifths of class II, less than half of class III, and one third of class IV and V are aware about treatment options for menopause which is a significant variation (χ (2) value = 20.127, df = 1, P < 0.0001). We also found that once counseled, more than half the subjects of classes I to V were willing to accept treatment, which thus is not a significant variation (P = 0.4659). Of the total subjects, more than half were relieved, one fourth frightened, and less than one fifth were uncertain about their feelings toward menopause. CONCLUSION: We thus conclude that there is a significant relationship between socioeconomic status and awareness about menopause treatment options while there is no relationship between socioeconomic status and acceptance of treatment for the same. A majority of the Indian women are relieved by the onset of menopause.