Greater COVID-19 Severity and Mortality in Hospitalized Patients in the Delta-phase Compared to the Others: A Single Center Prospective Registry.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To compare clinical and laboratory features, and outcomes in the second COVID-19 phase (delta variant) with the first and third phases in India we performed a registry-based study. METHODS: Patients with confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection were recruited over the study period from March 2020 to July 2022. In the first phase (wild type, March-December 2020) of the 7,476 suspected, 1,395 (18.7%) were positive and 863 (61.8%) were hospitalized, in the second phase (delta, January-July 2021) out of 8,680 suspected, 1,641 (19.4%) tested positive and 388 (23.6%) were hospitalized, and in the third phase (omicron, January-July 2022) out of 5,188 suspected patients, 886 (17.1%) tested positive and 94 (10.6%) were hospitalized. We compared details of admission clinical and laboratory features and in-hospital management and outcomes in the three phases. RESULTS: A total of 2,352 patients were recruited. The majority of the patients were men, aged <45 years were 20% and about 20% of patients had hypertension, diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases. Patients in the second phase had significantly more cough, fever, shortness of breath, and lower oxygen saturation (SpO2) at admission and also had more lymphopenia, C-reactive proteins (CRPs), interleukin-6, ferritin, lactic dehydrogenase, and transaminases than patients in the other two phases. In the second vs the first and third phases, the requirement of supplementary oxygen (47.9 vs 33.1 and 23.4%), proning (89.2 vs 37.1 and 5.3%), high flow nasal oxygen (15.7 vs 8.71 and 5.3%), noninvasive ventilation (14.4 vs 9.1 and 11.7%), invasive ventilation (16.2 vs 9.1 and 9.6%), steroids (94.1 vs 83.4 and 37.2%), remdesivir (91.2 vs 73.8 and 39.4%), and anticoagulants (94.3 vs 83.0 and 61.7%) was significantly more (p < 0.001). The median length of stay in days [interquartile range (IQR)] was longer in the second phase [8 (6-10)] vs the first [7 (5-10)] and the third phase [4 (3-6) days]. The intensive care unit (ICU) stay in the second phase [9 (5-13) days] was also significantly more than the first [6 (2-10)] and third [0 (0-3)] phases (p <0.001). Overall, in-hospital deaths occurred in 176 patients (12.8%). Deaths were significantly higher in the second phase (19.3%), compared to the first (11.0%) and the third (3.3%) phases (p <0.01). We also observed that greater disease severity at presentation was associated with higher mortality in all the phases. CONCLUSION: This study shows that COVID-19 patients that were hospitalized in the second (delta) phase of the epidemic had more severe disease compared to the first and third phases. In the second phase of patients, there was a significantly higher duration of hospitalization, ICU hospitalization, greater oxygen requirement, noninvasive and invasive ventilatory support, and more deaths.

Biomarkers and outcomes in hospitalised patients with COVID-19: a prospective registry.

OBJECTIVES: To determine association of biomarkers-high-sensitivity C reactive protein (hsCRP), D-dimer, interleukin-6 (IL-6), lactic dehydrogenase (LDH), ferritin and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR)-at hospitalisation with outcomes in COVID-19. DESIGN AND SETTING: Tertiary-care hospital based prospective registry. PARTICIPANTS: Successive virologically confirmed patients with COVID-19 hospitalised from April 2020 to July 2021 were prospectively recruited. Details of clinical presentation, investigations, management and outcomes were obtained. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: All biomarkers were divided into tertiles to determine associations with clinical features and outcomes. Primary outcome was all-cause deaths and secondary outcome was oxygen requirement, non-invasive and invasive ventilation, dialysis, duration of stay in ICU and hospital. Numerical data are presented in median and interquartile range (IQR 25-75). Univariate and multivariate (age, sex, risk factors, comorbidities, treatments) ORs and 95% CIs were calculated. RESULTS: 3036 virologically confirmed patients with COVID-19 were detected and 1251 hospitalised. Men were 70.0%, aged >60 years 44.8%, hypertension 44.1%, diabetes 39.6% and cardiovascular disease 18.9%. Median symptom duration was 5 days (IQR 4-7) and oxygen saturation 95% (90%-97%). Total white cell count was 6.9×109/L (5.0-9.8), neutrophils 79.2% (68.1%-88.2%), lymphocytes 15.8% (8.7%-25.5%) and creatinine 0.93 mg/dL (0.78-1.22). Median (IQR) for biomarkers were hsCRP 6.9 mg/dL (2.2-18.9), D-dimer 464 ng/dL (201-982), IL-6 20.1 ng/dL (6.5-60.4), LDH 284 mg/dL (220-396) and ferritin 351 mg/dL (159-676). Oxygen support at admission was in 38.6%, subsequent non-invasive or invasive ventilatory support in 11.0% and 11.6%, and haemodialysis in 38 (3.1%). 173 (13.9%) patients died and 15 (1.2%) transferred to hospice care. For each biomarker, compared with the first, those in the second and third tertiles had more clinical and laboratory abnormalities, and oxygen, ventilatory and dialysis support. Multivariate-adjusted ORs (95% CI) for deaths in second and third versus first tertiles, respectively, were hsCRP 2.24 (1.11 to 4.50) and 12.56 (6.76 to 23.35); D-dimer 3.44 (1.59 to 7.44) and 14.42 (7.09 to 29.30); IL-6 2.56 (1.13 to 5.10) and 10.85 (5.82 to 20.22); ferritin 2.88 (1.49 to 5.58) and 8.19 (4.41 to 15.20); LDH 1.75 (0.81 to 3.75) and 9.29 (4.75 to 18.14); and NLR 3.47 (1.68 to 7.14) and 17.71 (9.12 to 34.39) (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: High levels of biomarkers-hsCRP, D-dimer, IL-6, LDH, ferritin and NLR-in COVID-19 are associated with more severe illness and higher in-hospital mortality. NLR, a widely available investigation, provides information similar to more expensive biomarkers.

Evaluation Series on Safety and Efficacy of Nutritional Supplements in Newly Diagnosed Hyperglycemia: A Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Study.

BACKGROUND: Diabetes is endemic with developing economies contributing to the bulk of this pandemic. Despite the evidence of incremental benefit of glycemic control starting early in life, acceptance of and adherence to modern medications remain suboptimal. AIMS: To determine the hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c)-lowering efficacy and safety of nutritional supplement, PreCrea(®), in adult Indians with newly diagnosed hyperglycemia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Double-blind, randomized study conducted in six diabetes centers in India. A total of 193 treatment-naïve subjects with newly diagnosed hyperglycemia and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) >100 mg/dL were randomized into either PreCrea(®) 600 mg (n = 90) or matched placebo (n = 89) capsules twice daily, along with lifestyle modification, for 12 weeks. The main outcomes were changes in HbA1c and FPG levels, attainment of the American Diabetes Association (ADA)-defined goals for HbA1c, and clinical and biochemical measures of safety. RESULTS: At 12 weeks, mean HbA1c in PreCrea(®) group reduced by 0.91% compared with 0.08% increase in the placebo group (P < .001). The reductions in the mean FPG at week 4 (P < .001) and week 12 (P = 0.04) were significant compared to the baseline. ADA goal of HbA1c <7% increased from 15.5% at the baseline to 35.6% at week 12 in PreCrea(®) subjects. Clinical safety and biochemical safety did not change. Hypoglycemia and weight gain were not observed with PreCrea(®). CONCLUSIONS: Nearly 1% point reduction in HbA1c at week 12 with PreCrea(®) is comparable with most first-line glucose-lowering drugs. The safety and tolerability of PreCrea(®) highlights its potential as a first-line therapy in newly detected hyperglycemia.