ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: An anal fistula is a common benign anorectal disease that tends to reoccur simple or low-type fistulas can be treated without affecting the sphincter mechanism; however, repairing a complex ano fistula without compromising anal continence can be difficult for a surgeon. CASE PRESENTATION: Here, we present an anal fistula of complex clinical appearance managed successfully by the IFTAK (Interception of fistulous track with application of ksharsutra) technique practiced at Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India. The diagnosis was made via visual and bi-manual digital rectal examination then confirmed by Endoanal ultrasonography (EAUS). The patient showed remarkable improvement and the fistula healed completely in due course of time without impairing the anal continence status of the patient. At four months of follow-up the patient was healthy and no recurrence was found. CONCLUSION: IFTAK is a minimally invasive technique and very effective in managing complex fistula in ano of cryptoglandular origin. The main cause of recurrence in complex anal fistula is non-identification of an infected anal crypt, secondary extensions, associated sepsis, or abscess at the time of examination or surgery. So, precise diagnosis and appropriate surgical measures play an equal role in the successful outcome of anal fistula treatment, failure to either will result in non-healing or recurrence.
ABSTRACT
Image 1071765.
ABSTRACT
Background In Germany, 35% of all children are considered to have a "migration background", and in the state of North-Rhine-Westfalia 43%. Frequently, one or both parents of a patient with a migration background have limited German language proficiency. Communication barriers due to a language difference can have a negative impact on quality of care, patient safety and costs of care. In this study, we investigate how children's hospitals are prepared to meet the challenges associated with language barriers. Methods We surveyed all children's hospitals in the state of North-Rhine-Westfalia, Germany. The questionnaire was based on the "Standards for Culturally and Linguistically Appropriate Services in Health and Health Care (CLAS)" and was adapted to circumstances in Germany. Results Thirty-eight hospitals participated (51%) in this survey. Language barriers occurred frequently (75% of respondents mentioned language difficulties in more than 10% of the patient population). 82% of respondents rated their hospital to be "less than well prepared" to overcome language barriers. In the majority of hospitals (62%), the need for an interpreter was determined on a case-to-case basis and not according to any set protocol. In most cases bilingual staff was used for interpreting. However, only 38% of respondents found a list of available bilingual staff to be a sufficient resource. 42% of respondents did not know the monthly costs for professional interpreting services. In the remaining cases, costs were less than 500/month. Conclusion To overcome language barriers, hospitals rely on local resources. The majority of respondents did not find them to be appropriate and sufficient. The development of quality standards and the provision of financial resources are necessary to mobilize this potential for improvement. Therefore, other disciplines and sectors of healthcare need to be analyzed in order to provide the evidence for a constructive discussion with decision makers in policy and health insurance.
