Long-Term Survival After Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the long-term survival rates of patients undergoing isolated first-time coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) by off-pump CABG with the long-term survival rates in patients undergoing CABG using cardioplegic cardiopulmonary bypass techniques. METHODS: All patients undergoing isolated CABG at a single center (Manchester Heart Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom) between 2000 and 2014 were included. Propensity score matching was performed on the basis of on demographic variables. The in-hospital morbidity and long-term all-cause mortality rates for matched patients were compared. RESULTS: A total of 8,055 patients were identified, with a median follow-up of 7.0 years. With patients matched for preoperative patient characteristics, there was no significant difference in long-term survival between cardiopulmonary bypass and off-pump CABG (n = 2,082 each; 11.5 years vs 11.3 years; p = 0.178). In the off-pump CABG group, there were significantly fewer in-hospital cerebrovascular complications (0.5% vs 1.1%; p = 0.017), and mean length of stay was shorter (7.6 days vs 8.1 days; p < 0.0001). Arterial conduit use was significantly higher in the off-pump group, with more right mammary artery grafts (16.3% vs 4.3%; p < 0.0001) and sequential grafts (27.1% vs 13.5%; p < 0.0001). The mean number of grafts was higher in the on-pump group (3.28 ± 0.94 vs 3.10 ± 1.10; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Long-term survival after off-pump CABG is not inferior to long-term survival after on-pump CABG despite a lower mean number of grafts. A statistically significant difference in cerebrovascular complications may be related to conduit choice and reduced aortic manipulation.

Determining optimal fluid and air leak cut off values for chest drain management in general thoracic surgery.

BACKGROUND: Chest drain duration is one of the most important influencing aspects of hospital stay but the management is perhaps one of the most variable aspects of thoracic surgical care. The aim of our study is to report outcomes associated with increasing fluid and air leak criteria of protocol based management. METHODS: A 6-year retrospective analysis of protocolised chest drain management starting in 2007 with a fluid criteria of 3 mL/kg increasing to 7 mL/kg in 2011 to no fluid criteria in 2012, and an air leak criteria of 24 hours without leak till 2012 when digital air leak monitoring was introduced with a criteria of <20 mL/min of air leak for more than 6 hours. Patient data were obtained from electronic hospital records and digital chest films were reviewed to determine the duration of chest tube drainage and post-drain removal complications. RESULTS: From 2009 to 2012, 626 consecutive patients underwent thoracic surgery procedures under a single consultant. A total of 160 did not require a chest drain and data was missing in 22, leaving 444 for analysis. The mean age [standard deviation (SD)] was 57±19 years and 272 (61%) were men. There were no differences in the incidence of pneumothoraces (P=0.191), effusion (P=0.344) or re-interventions (P=0.431) for drain re-insertions as progressively permissive criteria were applied. The median drain duration dropped from 1-3 days (P<0.001) and accordingly hospital stay reduced from 4-6 days (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that chest drains can be safely removed without fluid criteria and air leak of less than 20 mL/min with median drain duration of 1 day, associated with a reduced length of hospital stay.

Surgical management of gastric stump cancer: a report of 37 cases / 浙江大学学报（英文版）（B辑：生物医学和生物技术）

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To observe the clinicopathological characteristics of gastric stump cancer (GSC) and evaluate the benefits of radical surgery of GSC.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>The clinicopathological characteristics and postoperative survival time of 37 GSC patients who underwent surgery were investigated retrospectively. The survival time was compared according to the type of surgical operation (radical resection vs palliative operation). Twenty-one cases that received radical resection were analyzed based on the pTMN stage. Survival curves were traced by using Kaplan-Meier methods.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Most GSC (32/37) was detected in patients who had received Billroth II reconstruction after partial gastrectomy for benign gastric disease. The lesser curvature side and the suture line of anastomosis were the most frequent sites where GSC occurred (27/37). Differentiated adenocarcinoma was the dominant histopathological type (24/37). The postoperative 5-year survival rate of early stage GSC patients (n=9) was significantly higher than advanced stage GSC (n=12) (55.6% vs 16.5%, xL2=11.48, P<0.01). Five-year survival rate of 21 GSC patients with radical resection were 75% (3/4) for stage I, 60% (3/5) for stage II, 14.2% (1/7) for stage III, and 0% (0/5) for stage IV respectively. The median survival time of 21 GSC patients who underwent radical resection was longer than those undergoing palliative operation (43.0 m vs 13.0 m, x L2=36.31, P<0.01), the median survival time of stage IV patients with radical resection was 23.8 months.</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>Without remote metastasis, radical resection for GSC is possible, and is an effective way to improve the prognosis of GSC. Even in stage IV GSC, radical resection can still prolong the survival time. It is necessary for the patients with benign gastric diseases who received partial gastrectomy to carry out the endoscopy follow-up, especially in patients with Billroth II reconstruction procedure at 15-20 years.</p>