A community-based geriatric interprofessional education experience and its impact on post-graduate collaborative practice.

While a growing body of interprofessional education (IPE) literature demonstrates a positive impact on learner knowledge, there is limited data on its long-term impact on collaborative practice (CP). With the growth of the aging population globally, understanding both the long-term impact on CP and sustainability of community-based geriatric experiential IPE programs are imperative. This study explores the impact of the Interprofessional Geriatric Curriculum (IPGC), a community-based geriatric IPE program, on post-graduate clinical practice among seven health professions. This study utilized a cross-sectional descriptive design, where both qualitative and quantitative data were collected in the same online survey of health professionals' to measure their perceptions of the impact IPGC has had on their respective clinical practice 1-3 years post-graduation. Forty-six per cent of health profession graduates provided clinical care for people 65 years of age or older; 81% worked in interprofessional teams; 80% reported the IPGC experience significantly impacted their practice (N = 137), and all used validated assessment tools taught in the IPGC program in their practice. Eight themes emerged from the list of what health professionals learned from IPGC that they use regularly in their clinical practice: four themes were interprofessional in nature (i.e. teamwork and team-based care, interprofessional communication, roles/responsibilities, and personal/professional) and four themes related to geriatrics (i.e. aging, screening and assessment, medications, and didactic content). This study is one of the first to describe the sustained influence of a community-based IPE program across multiple health professional disciplines on clinical geriatric practice.

Geriatric Pharmacotherapy Case Series: The Pharmacist's Role in Preventing Elder Abuse.

Elder abuse encompasses many types of abuse, including physical, sexual, emotional, neglect, and financial abuse. Abuse, including neglect and exploitation, is experienced by about 1 in 10 people aged 60 and older who live at home.1 However, this is likely an underestimation. Non-fatal injury reporting is limited to those collected from emergency department visits only, and under-reporting of abuse.1,4,15 It has been reported that only 1 in 24 cases of elder abuse are actually reported to authorities.4 Elder abuse is often perpetrated by the family members, caregivers, financial advisors, or other individuals trusted by the older person. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, there have been stay-at-home orders enacted throughout the country, confining older adults to their homes, potentially increasing their risk. These stay-at-home orders have also decreased social interactions, and social isolation is a known risk factor for elder abuse. During the pandemic, many visits to physicians have been canceled, delayed, or moved to telehealth; however, visits to pharmacies remained essential. Pharmacists are mandated reporters and are able to identify potential misuse of medications and physical and emotional abuse, and neglect. The discussion highlights the continued importance of the role of pharmacists in preventing and reporting elder abuse though discussion of a patient case.

Cognitive status predicts preoperative instruction compliance.

The most common postoperative complication for older adults is perioperative neurocognitive disorder (PNCD). Its greatest risk factor is preoperative cognitive impairment. Cognitive impairment also predicts higher likelihood of postoperative complications. While the cause of disparity in outcomes is likely multifactorial, the ability to correctly follow perioperative instructions may be one modifiable component. The purpose of this study was to determine whether cognitive impairment led to reduced preoperative instruction compliance and if so, identify barriers and enact a tailored care-plan to close the gap. Our preoperative clinic implemented routine Mini-Cog screening to identify older (age ≥ 65) surgical patients at increased risk. All patients received the same instructions and, on day of surgery, were surveyed to determine correct execution of nil per os guidelines, chlorhexidine wipe use and medication management. Data was stratified by cognitive status to evaluate whether impairment predicted instruction execution. Feedback from patients and families were compiled. Of those who screened negative for impairment, 68% correctly followed instructions, while 84.2% of those impaired struggled with ≥1 instruction(s); impaired patients were more likely to incorrectly follow instructions (OR = 10.5, p-value = 0.001). Areas for change were identified and team-based solutions were enacted with additional support for those with impairment. We found a clear difference in correct execution with respect to cognitive status. By improving instructions as an institution and adding additional support for those with impairment, the compliance gap was significantly reduced. Targeting perioperative instructions and tailoring care in this population may be one modifiable component in the outcome disparity they face.

Geriatric Pharmacotherapy Case Series: Poly-Provider Leading to Polypharmacy.

Background: This case study reviews the complicated treatment of an older person under the care of numerous specialists in the ambulatory care setting. As various providers made concurrent changes in pharmacotherapy without communication with other providers, the patient experienced acute changes and decompensation. Assessment: Polypharmacy played a significant role in the acute decompensation of the patient. Changes made in the context of specific specialties inadvertently had a negative impact on other disease states. Outcome: Intentional communication between all providers on the patient's health care team resulted in a deeper understanding of the overall plan and therapeutic goals. Care synchronization ultimately improved patient outcomes. The clinical pharmacy team provided multiple pharmacotherapy recommendations to improve pain and anxiety without jeopardizing safety and therapeutics for other disease states. These interventions provided a key element that streamlined and improved patient-centered care. Conclusion: In this case, poly-provider was responsible for polypharmacy that significantly impacted the patient's care and quality of life. Pharmacists and the pharmacists' patient care process play a significant role in improving patient-centered care by identifying medication changes and potential side effects, especially in the wake of interventions by multiple providers.

Beyond Cognitive Screening: Establishing an Interprofessional Perioperative Brain Health Initiative.

OBJECTIVE: Perioperative neurocognitive disorder (PND) is now recognized as the most common postoperative complication in older surgical patients. Current multidisciplinary guidelines recommend simple cognitive screening of older adults before surgery. Patients identified at risk should have input from an interprofessional team with expertise caring for older surgical patients. Data suggest these recommendations are infrequently met. We set out to test feasibility of routine cognitive screening in a busy preoperative assessment clinic and establish a perioperative pathway with multidisciplinary support for patients identified at risk. METHODS: We undertook a prospective quality improvement study. A cohort of 1,803 older surgical patients scheduled for preoperative evaluation was screened with the Mini-Cog© test. As the project developed, we began confirmatory neurocognitive testing by occupational therapists for those patients flagged at risk. Patients confirmed at risk were referred for further evaluation by a geriatrician and geriatric pharmacist. Alerts were developed to flag patients at risk through their in-patient journey, and a multidisciplinary team developed a comprehensive care pathway. RESULTS: We demonstrated that implementing routine cognitive screening can be done in a busy clinic, regardless of prior experience. The prevalence of preoperative cognitive impairment was 21% in our older patients undergoing inpatient surgery, rising to 36% in those older than 85 years. When the Mini-Cog results were not known to providers, they were unable to identify cognitive impairment in half of the patients, supporting the use of a validated screening test. We established an interprofessional team and pooled relevant recommendations into an age-friendly perioperative care pathway for patients at increased cognitive risk. CONCLUSION: Cognitive screening must be done to reliably identify older surgical patients at risk of PND. Demonstrating the prevalence of cognitive impairment in older surgical patients can provide impetus to develop a multidisciplinary team and care pathway with the aim of reducing the incidence of PNDs. J Am Geriatr Soc 68:2359-2364, 2020.