Immature platelet fraction (IPF) determined with an automated method predicts clopidogrel hyporesponsiveness.

The mechanisms for the variability in antiplatelet effects of clopidogrel are not elucidated entirely. Immature (reticulated) platelets may modulate the antiplatelet effects of clopidogrel but must be measured using flow cytometry. Whether new automated detection techniques yield similar results is not known. The objectives of the study to evaluate the role of immature platelets assessed by an automated method in response to the antiplatelet effects of clopidogrel. Twenty-nine healthy volunteers had platelet studies performed before and 1 week after 75 mg daily dosing of clopidogrel. Immature platelet fraction (IPF) was determined using an automated particle counter. Subjects were stratified into tertiles based on the IPF. Platelet studies included light transmission aggregometry (LTA), and vasodilator stimulated phosphoprotein phosphorylation (VASP-P) determined by platelet reactivity index (PRI). Baseline platelet aggregation responses to 2, 5 and 20 µM ADP, were similar in all three tertiles, however they were greater in the upper than in the lower tertile of immature platelets after clopidogrel in response to 5 µM ADP (54% vs. 23%, P = 0.02), with concordant trends for the other two concentrations. PRI was also greater in the upper tertile after clopidogrel (71.2% vs. 57.8%, P = 0.04). The frequency of clopidogrel hyporesponsiveness (aggregation >50% in response to 5 µM of ADP) was also higher in the upper tertile when compared to lower tertile, (60%) versus (10%) respectively (P = 0.02). [corrected]. Immature platelets measured using an automated method, are associated with impaired response to antiplatelet effects of clopidogrel.

Platelet activation patterns in platelet size sub-populations: differential responses to aspirin in vitro.

Circulating platelets are heterogeneous in size and structure. Whether this translates into differences in platelet function and efficacy of antiplatelet therapy is unclear. Hence, we decided to investigate the activation patterns among different platelet populations differentiated by size, and to compare the inhibitory effects of aspirin in these populations. Circulating platelets from 9 healthy volunteers were separated by size and stratified into the largest and smallest quintiles. Platelets were stimulated with 75 µM arachidonic acid (AA), 10 µM ADP or 25 µM TRAP. Alpha-granule protein secretion and expression (P-selectin, VWF, fibrinogen), surface-protein activation (activated integrin αIIbß3) were assessed. Platelet thromboxane B(2) (TxB(2)) synthesis following AA stimulation was measured in vitro before and after incubation with 265 µM aspirin. Reticulated (juvenile) platelets were assessed using thiazole orange staining. A greater number of large platelets in the largest quintile were reticulated compared with the smallest quintile (6.1 ± 2.8% vs. 1.2 ± 1.5% respectively, p < 0.001). Larger platelets also synthesized more TxB(2) than small platelets both before (1348 ± 276 pg/mL vs. 1023 ± 214 pg/mL, respectively, p = 0.01) and after aspirin (1029 ± 190 pg/mL vs. 851 ± 159 pg/mL, respectively, p = 0.03). After stimulation with each agonist, a greater proportion of large platelets bound fibrinogen, VWF, P-selectin and activated integrin αIIbß3 than small platelets both in the presence and in the absence of in vitro aspirin. In an in vitro setting, large platelets appear to be more active than small platelets and continue to be more active even after in vitro aspirin. Platelets exhibit heterogeneity in size and structure. Whether this translates into platelet function and efficacy of antiplatelet therapy is unclear. We evaluated platelet functional properties and the effects of aspirin on separated platelet subpopulations in an in vitro setting. Platelets were sorted into the largest and smallest size quintiles using flow cytometry forward scatter. Alpha-granule protein release, dense granule content, surface protein activation and thromboxane synthesis were significantly greater in large platelets compared with small platelets, before and after stimulation with arachidonic acid, ADP and TRAP. Even after incubation with aspirin, large platelets continued to be more active than small platelets. In conclusion, large platelets are more active than small platelets and aspirin fails to eliminate these differential activation properties.

Role of reticulated platelets and platelet size heterogeneity on platelet activity after dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel in patients with stable coronary artery disease.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between reticulated platelets (RPs), platelet size, and platelet function in patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD) taking aspirin and clopidogrel. BACKGROUND: Reticulated platelets are young platelets that are larger and possibly more active than non-RPs. METHODS: Flow cytometry was used to measure RPs after staining with thiazole orange and to define the upper 20% and lower 20% of platelets by size. Platelet aggregation was measured with light transmission aggregometry (LTA); platelet activation was assessed by measuring activated platelet surface expression of P-selectin and glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa. RESULTS: Ninety patients were recruited and stratified into tertiles of %RPs. Patients in the upper tertile displayed greater platelet aggregation to 5-mumol/l adenosine diphosphate (ADP) (50.7 +/- 16.4% vs. 34.2 +/- 17.3%, p < 0.001), 1.5-mmol/l arachidonic acid (AA) (27.3 +/- 16.9% vs. 11.7 +/- 9.3%, p < 0.001), and 1-mug/ml collagen (18 +/- 11.6% vs. 12.1 +/- 8.7%, p < 0.05) and greater expression of GP IIb/IIIa (4.7 +/- 1.8% vs. 3.1 +/- 2.2%, p < 0.001). Frequency of low response to aspirin (AA LTA >20%) was higher in the upper tertile (53% vs. 17%, p < 0.001) compared with the lower tertile; low response to clopidogrel (ADP LTA >50%) was also elevated in the upper tertile (50% vs. 13%, p = 0.003). The larger platelet gate had a higher % of RPs compared with the smaller gate (15.4 +/- 16.7% vs. 1.7 +/- 2.3%, p < 0.001) and greater GP IIb/IIIa (5.7 +/- 3.1 vs. 2.1 +/- 1.2, p < 0.001) and P-selectin expression (7.8 +/- 4.9 vs. 4.6 +/- 2.7, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of circulating RPs strongly correlates with response to antiplatelet therapy in patients with stable CAD. Large platelets exhibit increased reactivity despite dual antiplatelet therapy, compared with smaller platelets.

Increased platelet sensitivity among individuals with aspirin resistance - platelet aggregation to submaximal concentration of arachidonic acid predicts response to antiplatelet therapy.

Aspirin 'resistance' (AR) is a phenomenon of uncertain etiology describing decreased platelet inhibition by aspirin. We studied whether (i) platelets in AR demonstrate increased basal sensitivity to a lower degree of stimulation and (ii) platelet aggregation with submaximal stimulation could predict responses to aspirin. Serum thromboxane B(2) (TxB(2)) levels and platelet aggregation with light transmission aggregometry (LTA) were measured at baseline and 24 hours after 325 mg aspirin administration in 58 healthy subjects. AR was defined as the upper sixth of LTA (> or = 12%) to 1.5 mM AA. Baseline platelet aggregation with submaximal concentrations of agonists [ADP 2 microM, arachidonic acid (AA) 0.75 mM, collagen 0.375 and 0.5 microg/ml] was greater in AR subjects compared with non-AR subjects, but not with higher concentrations (ADP 5 microM and 20 microM, AA 1.5 mM and collagen 1 microg/ml). Post-aspirin platelet aggregation was elevated in AR subjects with both submaximal and maximal stimulation. Baseline and post-aspirin serum TxB(2) were higher in AR subjects and decreased further with ex-vivo COX-1 inhibition, suggesting incompletely suppressed COX-1 activity. Pre-aspirin platelet aggregation to 0.75 AA demonstrated a dichotomous response with 29/58 subjects having aggregation < or = 15% and 29/58 subjects having aggregation > or = 75%. In the high aggregation group 28% had AR compared to 6% in the non-AR group (p = 0.04). In conclusion, platelets in AR subjects demonstrate increased basal sensitivity to submaximal stimulation, which could predict responses to antiplatelet therapy.

Platelet reactivity among Asian Indians and Caucasians.

Asian Indians are reported to have higher mortality and morbidity from coronary artery disease (CAD) than other ethnic groups. This variation in events cannot be explained only by differences in conventional risk factors. Platelet activation is an important factor in the pathogenesis of CAD, however, there are limited data concerning platelet reactivity in Asian Indians. Therefore, we aimed to examine platelet reactivity in healthy Asian Indians vs. Caucasians. Thirty-five healthy, nonsmoking Asian Indians (mean age 30.1 +/- 3.6 years, 31.4% women) were matched for age and sex with 35 healthy, nonsmoking Caucasians (mean age 30.8 +/- 5 years, 31.4% women). Platelet reactivity was evaluated by measuring platelet aggregation, platelet leukocyte aggregates (PLA) formation in response to a 6-mer thrombin receptor agonist peptide (TRAP) at a final concentration of 40 microM and flow cytometry determined P-selectin expression induced by ADP, TRAP and arachidonic acid (AA). In addition, P-Selectin glycoprotein ligand-1 (PSGL-1) density on leukocytes was measured. There were no differences in platelet aggregation, basal PLA or PSGL-1 density on leukocytes between the two groups. AA-stimulated P-selectin expression was significantly higher in Asian Indians than in Caucasians (6.1 +/- 0.51 vs. 4.2 +/- 0.41 MFI, P < 0.02). After stimulation with TRAP, platelets from Asian Indians had increased PLA formation compared with Caucasians (41.6 +/- 2.9% vs. 31.4 +/- 2.7%, P < 0.02). AA induced P-selectin expression and TRAP stimulated PLA formation is increased in Asian Indians compared with Caucasians. These differences indicate an increase in measures of platelet reactivity among Asian Indians and may help elucidate the reported disparity in cardiovascular disease rates between the two ethnic groups.

What is the most appropriate methodology for detection of conduit artery endothelial dysfunction?

BACKGROUND: Use of upper-arm arterial occlusion to induce reactive hyperemia, and endothelium-dependent flow-mediated dilation (FMD) of the brachial artery, induces greater conduit vessel dilatation than lower-arm occlusion. However, brachial artery ischemia after upper arm arterial occlusion may make this approach unreliable. We studied whether upper or lower arm occlusions differ in their ability to detect endothelial dysfunction in cigarette smokers, and its improvement with an antioxidant strategy. METHODS AND RESULTS: Ten cigarette smokers with a >20 pack year history and 10 age- and gender-matched healthy controls participated in a 2-phase randomized controlled study of xanthine oxidase inhibition, using a 600-mg oral dose of allopurinol administered beforehand. Endothelium-dependent dilatation was assessed using ultrasound-Doppler after lower and upper arm occlusion. After lower arm occlusion, FMD was significantly impaired in smokers compared with controls (3.8+/-1.1% versus 8.7+/-2.2%; P=0.001). However, after upper arm occlusion, brachial artery dilatation in smokers was higher (11.8+/-2.7%; P<0.0001 versus lower arm) and did not differ from controls (9.4+/-2.9%; P=0.3). There was no difference in endothelium-independent dilatation to sublingual nitroglycerin between smokers and controls. Inhibition of xanthine oxidase with allopurinol improved lower arm FMD (3.8+/-1.1 to 10.1+/-1.9%; P<0.0001), but did not improve upper arm FMD (11.8+/-2.7 to 14.1+/-3.7%; P=0.4). CONCLUSIONS: Although upper arm occlusion induces robust brachial vasodilatation, it cannot detect endothelial dysfunction induced by smoking or its improvement by inhibition of xanthine oxidase. The increase in brachial artery diameter with upper arm occlusion may be confounded by ischemia of the artery. Conduit artery FMD after release of lower arm occlusion appears to be a more valid method for assessment of endothelial function in humans.

Effect of ranitidine on the antiplatelet effects of aspirin in healthy human subjects.

Aspirin is often taken with H2-receptor antagonists. In vitro data suggest that certain antagonists, such as ranitidine, have inhibitory effects on platelet function. There are no reports on the combined effect of aspirin and H2-receptor antagonists on platelet function in humans. Therefore, this study's aim was to evaluate the effects of aspirin, ranitidine, and their combination on platelet function in humans. Ten healthy men aged 34.7 +/- 2 years received aspirin 325 mg/day for 4 days followed by a 9-day washout period, 3 days of ranitidine treatment (150 mg twice daily), and 4 days of dual-drug treatment. Blood samples were drawn at baseline and on the last days of aspirin monotherapy, the washout period, ranitidine monotherapy, and dual-drug treatment. Platelet aggregation was measured in response to 0.5 mg/ml arachidonic acid, 5 and 10 mumol/L adenosine diphosphate, and 1 micro g/ml collagen. The Platelet Function Analyzer 100 test was performed, and blood salicylate levels were measured in 6 subjects. Aspirin caused a marked reduction in platelet aggregation and prolongation of Platelet Function Analyzer 100 closure time. Ranitidine caused a modest decrease in platelet aggregation. Unexpectedly, the combination of aspirin and ranitidine caused less inhibition of platelet aggregation and prolongation of Platelet Function Analyzer 100 time than aspirin alone (p = 0.02 to 0.07 compared with aspirin alone). Blood salicylate levels were lower when subjects took aspirin with ranitidine than when they took aspirin alone (1 +/- 0.8 vs 1.6 +/- 0.7 mg/dl, p = 0.005). In conclusion, ranitidine appears to attenuate the antiplatelet effects of aspirin in healthy volunteers. The most likely mechanism for these findings is a change in the absorption conditions of aspirin in the presence of ranitidine.

Genetic polymorphisms of the platelet receptors P2Y(12), P2Y(1) and GP IIIa and response to aspirin and clopidogrel.

INTRODUCTION: There is wide variability in the responses of individual patients to aspirin and clopidogrel. Polymorphisms of several platelet receptors have been related to increased platelet aggregation. We therefore aimed to evaluate whether these polymorphisms are related to altered response to aspirin or clopidogrel. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients (n=120) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention who received aspirin for > or =1 week but not clopidogrel were included. Blood samples were drawn at baseline and 20-24h after a 300-mg clopidogrel dose. Aspirin insensitivity was defined as 5 microM ADP-induced aggregation > or =70% and 0.5 mg/mL arachidonic acid-induced aggregation > or =20%. Clopidogrel insensitivity was defined as baseline minus post-treatment aggregation < or =10% in response to 5 and 20 microM ADP. PlA polymorphism of glycoprotein IIIa, T744C polymorphism of the P2Y(12) gene and the 1622A>G polymorphism of the P2Y(1) gene were genotyped by polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS: There were no differences in polymorphism frequencies between drug-insensitive vs. drug-sensitive patients. There were also no significant differences in response to aspirin (assessed by arachidonic acid-induced aggregation) or to clopidogrel (assessed by ADP-induced aggregation or activation markers) when patients were grouped according to genotype. The only trend observed was lower reduction in PAC-1 binding following clopidogrel in PlA(2) carriers (P=0.065). CONCLUSIONS: We did not find an association between polymorphisms in the platelet receptors GP IIIa, P2Y(12) or P2Y(1) and response to aspirin or clopidogrel in cardiac patients. These findings suggest that the variability in response to anti-platelet drugs is multi-factorial and is not caused only by single gene mutations.

Homocysteine: role and implications in atherosclerosis.

Hyperhomocysteinemia promotes atherosclerosis and is most commonly caused by B-vitamin deficiencies, especially folic acid, B(6), and B(12); genetic disorders; certain drugs; and renal impairment. Elevated homocysteine promotes atherosclerosis through increased oxidant stress, impaired endothelial function, and induction of thrombosis. Prospective studies have shown that elevated plasma homocysteine concentrations increase risk of cardiovascular disease by twofold and risk of cerebrovascular disease to a lesser degree. Hyperhomocysteinemia should be identified in patients with progressive or unexplained atherosclerosis and treated appropriately. Treatment of hyperhomocysteinemia is primarily through vitamin supplementation; folic acid and vitamins B(6) and B(12) are the mainstay of therapy. Betaine and 5-methyl tetrahydro-folate are also effective in lowering homocysteine levels. Treatment of moderately elevated plasma homocysteine in patients without atherosclerosis should be deferred until the completion of randomized outcome trials.

Aspirin and clopidogrel drug response in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: the role of dual drug resistance.

UNLABELLED: We evaluated the response to clopidogrel among aspirin-resistant versus aspirin-sensitive patients undergoing elective coronary stenting. Patients (n = 150) treated with aspirin but not clopidogrel had blood samples drawn at baseline and 24 h after clopidogrel loading. Depending on the definition used, 9% to 15% were resistant to aspirin and 24% to clopidogrel. About half of the aspirin-resistant patients were also resistant to clopidogrel. As a group, aspirin-resistant patients had lower response to clopidogrel (assessed by platelet aggregation and activation markers) than aspirin-sensitive patients. Both aspirin- and clopidogrel-resistant patients had higher incidence of creatine kinase-MB elevation than the respective sensitive patients. OBJECTIVES: We sought to evaluate the response to clopidogrel among aspirin-resistant versus aspirin-sensitive patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). BACKGROUND: Wide variability has been reported in response to aspirin and clopidogrel. There are limited data on the simultaneous responses to both drugs. METHODS: Elective PCI patients (n = 150) who received aspirin for > or = 1 week but not clopidogrel were included. All patients received bivalirudin during PCI. Blood samples were drawn at baseline and 20 to 24 h after a 300-mg clopidogrel dose. Aspirin resistance was defined by > or = 2 of 3 criteria: rapid platelet function analyzer-ASA score > or = 550, 5 micromol/l adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-induced aggregation > or = 70%, and 0.5 mg/ml arachidonic acid-induced aggregation > or = 20%. Clopidogrel resistance was defined as baseline minus post-treatment aggregation < or = 10% in response to 5 and 20 micromol/l ADP. RESULTS: Nineteen (12.7%) patients were resistant to aspirin and 36 (24%) to clopidogrel. Nine (47.4%) of the aspirin-resistant patients were also clopidogrel resistant. Aspirin-resistant patients were more likely to be women and have diabetes than were aspirin-sensitive patients. They also had lower response to clopidogrel, assessed by platelet aggregation and activation markers (flow cytometry-determined PAC-1 binding and P-selectin expression). Elevation of creatine kinase-myocardial band after stenting occurred more frequently in aspirin-resistant versus aspirin-sensitive patients (38.9% vs. 18.3%; p = 0.04) and in clopidogrel-resistant versus clopidogrel-sensitive patients (32.4% vs. 17.3%; p = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: Aspirin-resistant patients as a group have reduced response to clopidogrel. Furthermore, we have identified a unique group of dual drug-resistant patients who may be at increased risk for thrombotic complications after PCI.

Resistance to antiplatelet therapy.

Cardiovascular mortality continues to be high and events continue to occur in patients taking antiplatelet medications. Aspirin and clopidogrel have become integral parts of management in patients with coronary artery disease and after percutaneous angioplasty. However, the platelet responses to aspirin and clopidogrel are not uniform. Diminished or lack of response to these agents has been termed aspirin resistance and clopidogrel resistance. These phenomena have tremendous clinical significance as together they may occur in more than 50% of all patients on chronic therapy with aspirin or clopidogrel. Postulated mechanisms of aspirin and clopidogrel resistance include alterations in genetic, pharmacokinetic, and platelet properties. There is a dearth of information in regard to their clinical significance, methods to test them, and strategies to treat them. Further research is necessary in these areas to identify these patients and treat them appropriately.