Disability and narrative medicine: Challenges and opportunities.

Despite decades of international entreaties for improvement, education about and provision of healthcare for people with disabilities remains harmfully inferior to that of the non-disabled population. Many obstacles confound efforts to ameliorate this inequity, perhaps the most pernicious of which is negative bias on the part of providers. Narrative medicine offers a means to address healthcare attitudes towards people with disabilities, in particular negative attitudes based on 'ableism'. Through absorbing, writing, and sharing of diverse perspectives, narrative medicine kindles imagination and empathy, promoting self-reflection. This approach enriches the students' capacity to absorb what their patients are trying to say, and to appreciate, respect, and hopefully meet the healthcare needs of people with disability. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: Narrative medicine is a pedagogical tool to help providers listen and reflect on patients with disabilities.

The Need for a Clinically Useful Schema of Social Communication.

The recent Translations article by Bishop et al.1 draws much-needed attention to social communication (SC) in autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and to the need in autism research for treatment-sensitive measures of this key domain. In this context, the authors define SC ability as "the appropriate use and modulation of verbal and nonverbal behaviors during interactions with others"1(p. 555). "Appropriate" is defined relative to normative behaviors for developmental age and language level based on parent report. This stirred us to share our concern that clinicians, too, need ways to assess SC. Historically, observation of a patient's SC has not been part of the routine psychiatric mental status examination (MSE); clinicians lack even a common basic vocabulary for describing this vital domain. The DSM-52 does not explicitly define SC or distinguish it from social interaction (SI) or language, important terms also used in the criteria for ASD. All three terms are used interchangeably and inconsistently across the literature. Here we offer a definition of SC, distinguish it from SI and language, and propose a schema, or conceptual model, for observing and documenting an impression of a patient's SC.