Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 86: 338-348, 2022 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35717008

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) is a major inconvenience in the use of iodinated contrast media (ICM) and it is associated with a significant increase in morbidity and mortality and cost of hospitalization. Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) is a noninvasive and cost-effective tissue protection technique that has showed to be beneficial in decreasing renal insult in patients receiving intravascular contrast. AIM: The primary outcome of this study is to evaluate the impact of RIPC on the incidence of CIN in patients undergoing endovascular aneurysm repair. METHODS: Patients suffering from aortic aneurysm were recruited prior to the administration of ICM. Randomization was used to assign patients into the control/RIPC groups. Biochemical parameters determined renal function before and after surgery in immediate (24-72 hr) and at 30 days of follow-up. RESULTS: Of the 120 patients included in the study, 98,3% were male. Mean age was 73 years (range: 56-87 years). Diabetes and chronic renal failure (considering estimated glomerular filtration [eGFR] <60) was present prior to administration of ICM in 29.16% and 38.33%, respectively. RIPC was applied in 50% (n = 60) of the patients. A total of 24.17% developed CIN regardless of fluidotherapy, RIPC, and other protective strategies. RIPC did not influence outcomes in terms of incidence on CIN, serum creatinine, urea, eGFR, or microalbuminuria in immediate postoperative period. However, the group of RIPC patients showed a statistically significant benefit in renal function in terms of serum creatinine (1.46 ± 0.3 vs. 1.03 ± 0.5; P < 0.001), urea (61.06 ± 27.5 mg/dL vs. 43.78 ± 12.9 mg/dL; P = 0.003), and an increase in eGFR (56.37 ± 23.4 mL/min/1.73 m2 vs. 72.85 ± 17.7 mL/min/1.73 m2; P = 0.004) at 30 days of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: RIPC seems to be a reasonable, effective, and low-cost technique to alleviate effects of ICM on the renal parenchyma in endovascular aneurysm repair procedures during short-term postoperative period.


Subject(s)
Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation , Endovascular Procedures , Ischemic Preconditioning , Kidney Diseases , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/surgery , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/chemically induced , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Contrast Media/adverse effects , Creatinine , Endovascular Procedures/adverse effects , Incidence , Ischemic Preconditioning/methods , Treatment Outcome , Urea
2.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 50: 253-258, 2018 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29501596

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Endovascular procedures come with a potential risk of radiation hazards both to patients and to the vascular staff. Classically, most endovascular interventions took place in regular operating rooms (ORs) using a fluoroscopy C-arm unit controlled by a third party. Hybrid operating rooms (HORs) provide an optimal surgical suit with all the qualities of a fixed C-arm device, while allowing the device to be controlled by the surgical team. The latest studies suggest that an operator-controlled system may reduce the radiation dose. The purpose of the present study is to determine the amount of absorbed radiation using an HOR in comparison with a portable C-arm unit and to assess whether the radioprotection awareness of the surgical team influences the radiation exposure. The primary end point was the effective dose in milliSievert (mSv) for the surgical team and the average dose-area product (ADAP) in Gray-meters squared (Gym2) for patients. METHODS: The values of absorbed radiation of the surgical team's dosimeters were collected from January 2015 to May 2016. The HOR was installed in June 2015, and a radioprotection seminar was given in October 2015. The HOR-issued radiation, measured by the maximum dose-area product, ADAP, average dose (AD) per procedure, maximum dose per procedure per month, maximum fluoroscopy time, average fluoroscopic time, peak skin dose, and average skin dose (ASD), was collected monthly from September 2015 to July 2016. The timeline was divided into 3 periods: 5 months pre-HOR (Pre-HOR), 5 months after the HOR installation (PreS-HOR), and 5 months after a radioprotection seminar (PostS-HOR). RESULTS: The average number of procedures per month was 22.55 (±4.9), including endovascular aneurysm repair/thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair, carotid, visceral, and upper and lower limb endovascular revascularization. The average amount of absorbed radiation by the surgeons during PreS-HOR was 1.07 ± 0.4 mSv, which was higher than the other periods (Pre-HOR 0.06 ± 0.03 mSv, P = 0.002; PostS-HOR 0.14 ± 0.09 mSv, P = 0.000, respectively). The ADAP during PreS-HOR was 0.016 ± 0.01 Gym2, which was lower than the PostS-HOR (0.001 ± 0.002 Gym2) (P = 0.034). The AD during PreS-HOR was 0.78 ± 0.3 Gy and 0.39 ± 0.3 Gy during PostS-HOR (P = 0.098). The ASD during PreS-HOR was 0.40 ± 0.2 Gy and 0.20 ± 0.1 Gy during PostS-HOR (P = 0.099). CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, the HOR increases the amount of absorbed radiation for both patients and surgeons. The radioprotection seminars are of utmost importance to provide a continued training and optimize the use of ionizing radiation while using an HOR. Despite the awareness of the surgical team in the radioprotection field, the amount of absorbed radiation using an HOR is higher than the one using a C-Arm unit.


Subject(s)
Endovascular Procedures , Learning Curve , Occupational Exposure/prevention & control , Occupational Health , Operating Rooms/organization & administration , Patient Safety , Radiation Dosage , Radiation Exposure/prevention & control , Radiation Protection/methods , Radiography, Interventional , Checklist , Clinical Competence , Endovascular Procedures/adverse effects , Endovascular Procedures/instrumentation , Equipment Design , Humans , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Occupational Injuries/etiology , Occupational Injuries/prevention & control , Patient Care Team , Radiation Exposure/adverse effects , Radiation Injuries/etiology , Radiation Injuries/prevention & control , Radiation Monitoring/methods , Radiography, Interventional/adverse effects , Radiography, Interventional/instrumentation , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors
5.
Rev Port Cir Cardiotorac Vasc ; 22(2): 101-107, 2015.
Article in Portuguese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27927003

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Intravascular iodinated contrasts are essencial in endovascular therapy. One of their major inconveniences is contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN), which has been associated with an increase in complications and prolonged hospital stay. AIM: To analyze the incidence of CIN in patients undergoing endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) in our hospital. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective study including patients (n=129) treated with EVAR between January 2014 - September 2015. Information was gathered concerning age, history of diabetes, hypertension, pre-existing chronic kidney disease and previous treatment with diuretics or metformin. We analyzed serum levels of urea, creatinine, sodium, potassium and glomerular filtrate (GF), at baseline, at 24hours, peak levels during post-operative period and before discharge. The amount of intravascular contrast and periprocedureral hydration were correlated to creatinine and GF to determine their effect on CIN. RESULTS: Of 129 patients, 11 (8.53%) developed CIN. A significant difference was found between preoperative and postoperative levels of urea and sodium, both p<0.001.Volume of contrast was the only variable that presented a statistically significant association with increase of creatinine levels in postoperative period (p=0.032). Worsening of glomerular filtrate showed a statistically significant association with preoperative levels of urea (p=0.036) and GF (p= 0.019). Fluid-therapy before or after exposure to contrast did not show any influence on the outcome. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of CIN depends mainly on baseline GF and amount of contrast, and it is barely associated with hydration during the perioperative period. Since there is no specific treatment for CIN, the best practice is its prevention.

6.
Rev Port Cir Cardiotorac Vasc ; 22(2): 109-113, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27927004

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: True brachial artery aneurysms are. Recent case reports have suggested aneurysmal degeneration of brachial artery in kidney transplant receptors after arteriovenous fistula (AVF) ligation. We present a study on the evolution of the brachial artery in this context in our center. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a descriptive study in kidney transplant receptors in whom AVF was ligated between 2008 and 2015. Patients with AVF in both upper limbs were excluded. Diameters of axillary artery, brachial artery in middle portion and its bifurcation, as well as brachial artery flow were measured using Dupplex ultrasound in AVF and contralateral limb. Both groups were compared using the Student t-test for paired samples. RESULTS: 20 patients were included in the study and had a mean age of 59.35 ± 2.49 years. The median time of use of AVF for hemodialysis was 729 days (range 120-6117) and the median time in which AVF was patent was 2261 days (range 791-7091). Mean diameters (in mm) of axillary artery, brachial in middle portion and bifurcation were respectively 9.33 ± 1.07, 7.5 ± 0.61 and 5.81 ± 0.43 in AVF arm and 5.6 ± 2.8, 4.4 ± 0.1, 4.9 ± 0.15 in control limb, finding statistically significant differences (p <0.01) in brachial and axillary arteries. 5 patients (25%) developed aneurysm, 2 of which (10%) underwent surgery and 3 are on follow up. CONCLUSION: True incidence of brachial artery aneurysm in kidney receptors following AVF ligation is high. Careful follow up with physical examination and dupplex scanning are needed to find this complication.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...