Mutational spectrum of GNAL, THAP1 and TOR1A genes in isolated dystonia: study in a population from Spain and systematic literature review.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate the prevalence of TOR1A, GNAL and THAP1 variants as the cause of dystonia in a cohort of Spanish patients with isolated dystonia and in the literature. METHODS: A population of 2028 subjects (including 1053 patients with different subtypes of isolated dystonia and 975 healthy controls) from southern and central Spain was included. The genes TOR1A, THAP1 and GNAL were screened using a combination of high-resolution melting analysis and direct DNA resequencing. In addition, an extensive literature search to identify original articles (published before 10 August 2020) reporting mutations in TOR1A, THAP1 or GNAL associated to dystonia was performed. RESULTS: Pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in TOR1A, THAP1 and GNAL were identified in 0.48%, 0.57% and 0.29% of our patients, respectively. Five patients carried the variation p.Glu303del in TOR1A. A very rare variant in GNAL (p.Ser238Asn) was found as a putative risk factor for dystonia. In the literature, variations in TOR1A, THAP1 and GNAL accounted for about 6%, 1.8% and 1.1% of published dystonia patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: There is a different genetic contribution to dystonia of these three genes in our patients (about 1.3% of patients) and in the literature (about 3.6% of patients), probably due the high proportion of adult-onset cases in our cohort. As regards age at onset, site of dystonia onset, and final distribution, in our population there is a clear differentiation between DYT-TOR1A and DYT-GNAL, with DYT-THAP1 likely to be an intermediate phenotype.

Mitos y evidencias en el empleo de la toxina botulínica: neurofarmacología y distonías / Myths and evidence on the use of botulinum toxin: neuropharmacology and dystonia

Introducción. La toxina botulínica de tipo A (TBA) ha supuesto una verdadera revolución terapéutica en neurología, y en la actualidad es el tratamiento rutinario en las distonías focales y la espasticidad. Objetivo. Plantear, revisar y responder cuestiones controvertidas en relación con la neurofarmacología de a TBA y su uso en las distonías en la práctica clínica habitual. Desarrollo. Un grupo de expertos en trastornos del movimiento revisó una lista de temas controvertidos relacionados con la farmacología de la TBA y su uso en las distonías. Revisamos la bibliografía e incluimos artículos relevantes especialmente en inglés, pero también, si su importancia lo merece, en castellano y en francés, hasta junio de 2016. El documento se estructuró como un cuestionario que incluyó las preguntas que podrían generar mayor controversia o duda. El borrador inicial del documento fue revisado por los miembros del panel y se realizaron las modificaciones necesarias hasta alcanzar el mayor grado de consenso. Incluimos preguntas sobre diferentes aspectos de la neurofarmacología, especialmente el mecanismo de acción, la bioequivalencia de los diferentes preparados y la inmunogenicidad. En relación con el subapartado de las distonías, se incluyeron aspectos sobre la evaluación y el tratamiento de las distonías focales. Conclusiones. Esta revisión no pretende ser una guía, sino una herramienta práctica destinada a neurólogos y médicos internos residentes interesados en esta área, dentro de diferentes ámbitos específicos del manejo de la TBA (AU)

Introduction. Botulinum toxin type A (BTA) is a bacterial endotoxin, whose therapeutic use has had a dramatic impact on different neurological disorders, such as dystonia and spasticity. Aim. To analyze and summarize different questions about the use of BTA in our clinical practice. Development. A group of experts in neurology developed a list of topics related with the use of BTA. Two groups were considered: neuropharmacology and dystonia. A literature search at PubMed, mainly for English language articles published up to June 2016 was performed. The manuscript was structured as a questionnaire that includes those questions that, according to the panel opinion, could generate more controversy or doubt. The initial draft was reviewed by the expert panel members to allow modifications, and after subsequent revisions for achieving the highest degree of consensus, the final text was then validated. Different questions about diverse aspects of neuropharmacology, such as mechanism of action, bioequivalence of the different preparations, immunogenicity, etc. were included. Regarding dystonia, the document included questions about methods of evaluation, cervical dystonia, blepharospasm, etc. Conclusion. This review does not pretend to be a guide, but rather a tool for continuous training of residents and specialists in neurology, about different specific areas of the management of BTA (AU)

Lack of validation of variants associated with cervical dystonia risk: a GWAS replication study.

BACKGROUND: A recent genome-wide association study (GWAS) has identified a putative association, not statistically confirmed, of cervical dystonia within several regions in a British population. Hence, the authors proposed dysfunction of the ion channel NALCN (for sodium leak channel, nonselective) as a plausible cause of cervical dystonia. The objective of our study was to investigate the association of five single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) previously reported with high signals as putative genetic risk factors for cervical dystonia in a British GWAS, including two located in the NALCN gene region. METHODS: We performed a case-control association study in a Spanish population. The SNPs selected for genotyping were two SNPS in the NALCN gene (rs61973742 and rs1338041), one SNP in the OR4X2 gene (rs67863238), one SNP in the COL4A1 region (rs619152), and one intergenic SNP (rs1249277). Genomic DNA was collected from 252 patients with cervical dystonia, with a mean age of 55.3 ± 14.1 years (mean age at onset, 43.5 ± 15.7 years), and 342 unrelated control subjects with a mean age of 56.3 ± 14.3 years. Genotyping of SNPs was performed using TaqMan assays and SimpleProbe assays. RESULTS: The SNP rs619152 had to be excluded because of assay failure. No significant differences were found in allele distribution between cases and controls for all analyzed SNPs. Therefore, we found no association with cervical dystonia for the analyzed SNPs in our Spanish population. CONCLUSIONS: We did not find any evidence supporting the association of NALCN with cervical dystonia, indicating that this gene is not implicated in the pathogenesis of this disorder in our cervical dystonia population.

BDNF Val66Met polymorphism in primary adult-onset dystonia: a case-control study and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: A polymorphism in brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) (Val66Met) has been reported as a risk factor in primary dystonia. However, overall the results have been inconclusive. Our aim was to clarify the association of Val66Met with primary dystonia, and with the most prevalent clinical subtypes, cervical dystonia and blepharospasm. METHODS: We conducted a Spanish multicenter case-control study (including 680 primary dystonia patients and 788 healthy controls) and performed a meta-analysis integrating our study and six previously published studies (including a total of 1,936 primary dystonia patients and 2,519 healthy controls). RESULTS: We found no allelic or genotypic association with primary dystonia, cervical dystonia, or blepharospasm risks, for the allele A (Met) from a BDNF Val66Met polymorphism in our case-control study. This was confirmed by results from our meta-analysis in white and mixed ethnic populations in any genetic model. CONCLUSION: We did not find any evidence supporting the association of the BDNF Val66Met polymorphism with primary dystonia.