ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Central venous-arterial PCO2 to arterial-central venous O2 content ratio (Pcv-aCO2/Ca-cvO2) is commonly used as a surrogate for respiratory quotient (RQ) and tissue oxygenation. Although Pcv-aCO2/Ca-cvO2 might be associated with hyperlactatemia and outcome, neither the interchangeability with RQ nor the correlation with conclusive variables of anaerobic metabolism has never been demonstrated in septic shock. Our goal was to compare Pcv-aCO2/Ca-cvO2 and RQ in patients with septic shock. DESIGN: Prospective, observational study. SETTING: Two adult ICUs. PATIENTS: Forty-seven patients with septic shock on mechanical ventilation with stable respiratory settings and vasopressor dose after initial resuscitation. INTERVENTIONS: None. MAIN VARIABLES OF INTEREST: We measured arterial and central venous gases, Hb, and O2Hb. Pcv-aCO2/Ca-cvO2 and the ratio of central venous-arterial CO2 content to arterial-central venous O2 content (Ccv-aCO2/Ca-cvO2) were calculated. RQ was determined by indirect calorimetry. RESULTS: Pcv-aCO2/Ca-cvO2 and Ccv-aCO2/Ca-cvO2 were not correlated with RQ (R2 = 0.01, P = 0.50 and R2 = 0.01, P = 0.58, respectively), showing large bias and wide 95 % limits of agreement with RQ (1.09, -1.10-3.27 and 0.42, -1.53-2.37). A multiple linear regression model showed Hb, and central venous PCO2 and O2Hb, but not RQ, as Pcv-aCO2/Ca-cvO2 determinants (R2 = 0.36, P = 0.0007). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with septic shock, Pcv-aCO2/Ca-cvO2 did not correlate with RQ and was mainly determined by factors that modify the dissociation of CO2 from Hb. Pcv-aCO2/Ca-cvO2 seems to be a poor surrogate for RQ; therefore, its values should be interpreted with caution.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The main functions of the endotracheal tube (ETT) cuff are to prevent aspiration and to allow pressurization of the respiratory system. For this purpose, it is essential to maintain adequate pressure inside the cuff, thus reducing the risks for the patient. It is regularly checked using a manometer and is considered the best alternative. The objective of this study was to evaluate the cuff pressure behavior of different ETTs during the simulation of an inflation maneuver using different manometers. METHODS: A bench study was performed. Four brands of 8-mm internal diameter single lumen with a Murphy eye ETT with cuff and 3 different brands of manometers were used. In addition, a pulmonary mechanics monitor was connected to the inside of the cuff through the body of the distal end of the ETT. RESULTS: A total of 528 measurements were made on the 4 ETTs. During the complete procedure (connection and disconnection), there was a significant pressure drop of 7 ± 1.4 cm H2O from the initial pressure (Pinitial) (P < .001), of which 6 ± 1.4 cm H2O was lost during connection (difference between Pinitial and Pconnection). The Preconnection value was 19.1 ± 1.6 cm H2O, showing a significant total pressure drop of 11 ± 1.6 cm H2O (difference between Pinitial and Preconnection) (P < .001). The Pfinal mean was 29.6 ± 1.3 cm H2O. Significant differences were found between manometers according to the time of measurement. A similar phenomenon was evidenced when analyzing different ETTs. CONCLUSIONS: Significant pressure changes occur secondary to ETT cuff measurement, which has important implications for patient safety.
Subject(s)
Intubation, Intratracheal , Trachea , Humans , Intubation, Intratracheal/methods , PressureABSTRACT
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Devices for assessing microcirculation at the bedside have been a technological breakthrough in the critical care field. Thanks to this technology, a large body of scientific evidence has highlighted the relevance of microcirculatory disruptions during critical illness. The goal of this review is to analyze the current knowledge concerning microcirculation monitoring, mainly focused on clinically available devices. RECENT FINDINGS: New evidence in oxygenation monitoring, advances in hand-held vital microscopes, and improvements in laser-based techniques ensure the possibility of detecting poor resuscitation, testing vascular reactivity, and assessing the effect of therapy during shock and resuscitation. SUMMARY: Currently, there are several methods for microcirculatory monitoring. To properly apply and correctly interpret the information they provide, clinicians should know the fundamental principles and the strengths and weaknesses of the clinically available devices.
