Impact of a Successful Percutaneous Mitral Paravalvular Leak Closure on Long-term Major Clinical Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous mitral paravalvular leak (PVL) closure techniques are an effective and safe alternative to surgical treatment, but data regarding long-term outcomes are scarce. We aim to describe the impact of successful percutaneous mitral PVL closure on long-term outcomes. METHODS: All consecutive patients in whom a first-attempt percutaneous mitral PVL closure was performed in a single tertiary centre between January 2010 and October 2021 were included. Clinical variables, procedural details, and procedural success were collected. Patients were classified based on procedural success, defined as no more than mild residual leak. All-cause mortality was the primary endpoint. Cardiovascular death and heart failure hospitalizations (HFHs) were key secondary endpoints. RESULTS: Ninety patients (median age 72.5 years [66.0-78.4]; median EuroSCORE-II 8.2 [5.3-12.46]) were included. Although reduction of at least 1 degree in PVL severity was achieved in 82 (91.1%), procedural success was achieved in 47 (52.2%). Chronic kidney disease, previous surgery for PVL, and the presence of multiple jets were independently associated with procedural failure. After a median follow-up of 3.2 (1.2-5.2) years, mortality rate was higher in the procedural failure group (27.3 per 100 patients-years) compared with the group with successful closure (8.2 per 100 patient-years). Procedural failure was associated with all-cause death (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 2.59; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.41-4.78), cardiovascular death (aHR, 3.53; 95% CI, 1.67-7.49) and HFH (aHR, 3.27; 95% CI,1.72-6.20). CONCLUSIONS: A successful reduction in PVL to mild or absent is associated with improved rates of all-cause death, cardiovascular death, and HFHs.

Association of Genetic Variants With Outcomes in Patients With Nonischemic Dilated Cardiomyopathy.

BACKGROUND: The clinical relevance of genetic variants in nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is unsettled. OBJECTIVES: The study sought to assess the prognostic impact of disease-causing genetic variants in DCM. METHODS: Baseline and longitudinal clinical data from 1,005 genotyped DCM probands were retrospectively collected at 20 centers. A total of 372 (37%) patients had pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants (genotype positive) and 633 (63%) were genotype negative. The primary endpoint was a composite of major adverse cardiovascular events. Secondary endpoints were end-stage heart failure (ESHF), malignant ventricular arrhythmia (MVA), and left ventricular reverse remodeling (LVRR). RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 4.04 years (interquartile range: 1.70-7.50 years), the primary endpoint had occurred in 118 (31.7%) patients in the genotype-positive group and in 125 (19.8%) patients in the genotype-negative group (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.51; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.17-1.94; P = 0.001). ESHF occurred in 60 (16.1%) genotype-positive patients and in 55 (8.7%) genotype-negative patients (HR: 1.67; 95% CI: 1.16-2.41; P = 0.006). MVA occurred in 73 (19.6%) genotype-positive patients and in 77 (12.2%) genotype-negative patients (HR: 1.50; 95% CI: 1.09-2.07; P = 0.013). LVRR occurred in 39.6% in the genotype-positive group and in 46.2% in the genotype-negative group (P = 0.047). Among individuals with baseline left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35%, genotype-positive patients exhibited more major adverse cardiovascular events, ESHF, and MVA than their genotype-negative peers (all P < 0.02). LVRR and clinical outcomes varied depending on the underlying affected gene. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, DCM patients with pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants had worse prognosis than genotype-negative individuals. Clinical course differed depending on the underlying affected gene.

Contrast-Enhanced Echocardiographic Measurement of Left Ventricular Wall Thickness in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: Comparison with Standard Echocardiography and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance.

BACKGROUND: Left ventricular wall thickness (LVWT) measurement is key in the diagnostic and prognostic assessment of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). Recent investigations have highlighted discrepancies in LVWT by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) and standard echocardiography (S-Echo) in this condition. The aim of this study was to elucidate the role of contrast-enhanced echocardiography (C-Echo) to optimize LVWT measurement in patients with HCM. METHODS: Fifty patients with HCM were prospectively enrolled, undergoing S-Echo, C-Echo, and CMR. Blinded LVWT measurements were performed according to a 16-segment left ventricular model using all three imaging techniques. Agreement between both echocardiographic modalities and CMR (as the reference technique) at the segmental level was tested using Bland-Altman analyses. Reproducibility on segmental measurements by S-Echo and C-Echo was also investigated. RESULTS: Patients' mean age was 47 ± 21 years, and 35 (70%) were men. Maximal mean LVWT by S-Echo (20.1 ± 3.8 mm) was greater than the values derived using C-Echo (17.6 ± 4.0 mm, P < .01) and CMR (17.7 ± 4.5 mm, P < .01), with no statistically significant difference between the latter two. Segmental Bland-Altman models demonstrated globally smaller bias and narrower 95% limits of agreement for C-Echo compared with S-Echo. Across all left ventricular segments, LVWT by C-Echo was 2.4 mm lower (range, 1.0-2.5 mm) than that derived by S-Echo, which accounted for a 25% intertechnique difference. Regarding maximal LVWT, the mean absolute difference between C-Echo and S-Echo was 3.0 ± 1.9 mm (range, 0.0-7.9 mm), which represented a 15% intertechnique change. Data analyses demonstrated globally less intra- and interobserver variability in segmental LVWT derived from C-Echo compared with S-Echo. CONCLUSIONS: C-Echo rendered LVWT measurements closer to those derived by the reference technique (CMR) and improved reproducibility compared with S-Echo. C-Echo represents a suitable tool for LVWT measurement in patients with HCM as an alternative to CMR whenever this is not available or possible.

Structural abnormalities in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy beyond left ventricular hypertrophy by multimodality imaging evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Echocardiography- and cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR)-based studies have revealed a wide range of phenotypic manifestations in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) apart from hypertrophy. This study sought to comprehensively describe a number of structural abnormalities in HCM beyond hypertrophy, by multimodality imaging. METHODS: A total of 100 HCM patients were prospectively enrolled, undergoing standard and contrast echocardiography, and CMR. Morphological characteristics involving mitral valve leaflets (MVL), subvalvular apparatus, and left ventricular cavity and wall were investigated. Seventy healthy volunteers served as control population. RESULTS: As assessed by echo, MVLs were longer in HCM patients than in controls (anterior method 1: 24[22,28] vs 19[18,20] mm, P < 0.01; anterior method 2: 27[24, 29] vs 21[19, 23] mm, P < 0.01; posterior: 15[12,19] vs 14[13,15] mm, P < 0.01). Abnormal chordal attachment to anterior MVL, anterior papillary muscle displacement, and accessory apical-basal muscle bundle were present in 42 (42%), 61 (61%), and 35 (35%) patients, respectively (P values vs controls <0.01); direct papillary muscle insertion into MVL and hypertrabeculation were found in two and five patients, respectively. Contrast echocardiography (n = 94) detected myocardial crypts in 15 patients (16%). Overall, 83% of HCM subjects had at least one of these phenotypic manifestations. Echocardiography and CMR agreement for MVL length was poor, while for structural characteristics was moderate to substantial (Cohen's Kappa: 0.53-1.00). Except for posterior MVL length and hypertrabeculation, the phenotypic characteristics studied had acceptable reproducibility by echocardiography and CMR. CONCLUSIONS: Structural abnormalities in HCM beyond hypertrophy are significantly common. Multimodality imaging approach to these HCM facets by echocardiography and CMR is feasible and desirable.

A risk score to predict the absence of left ventricular reverse remodeling: Implications for the timing of ICD implantation in primary prevention.

BACKGROUND: A prophylactic implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) in patients with heart failure and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (HFrEF) is only indicated when left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) reassessment remains ≤35% after 3-6 months on optimal pharmacological therapy. However, LVEF may not improve during this period and the patient may be exposed to an unnecessary risk of sudden cardiac death. This study aimed to determine the incidence and predictors of the absence of left ventricular reverse remodeling (LVRR) after pharmacological treatment optimization in patients with HFrEF to design a risk score of absence of LVRR. METHODS: Consecutive outpatients with LVEF ≤35% were included in this observational prospective study. Up-titration of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors/angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), beta-blockers, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs), and ivabradine was performed in our Heart Failure (HF) Unit. The absence of LVRR was defined as the persistence of an LVEF ≤35% at the 6-month follow-up. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty patients were included. At the 6-month follow-up, 64%, 76%, 72%, and 7% of patients were at 100% of the target dose of ACE inhibitors/ARBs, beta-blockers, MRAs, and ivabradine, respectively. LVRR was observed in 48% of the patients. Ischemic cardiomyopathy, prolonged HF duration, and larger left ventricular end-diastolic diameter index (LVEDDI) were independent predictors of the absence of LVRR. The risk score based on these predictors showed a c-statistic value of 0.81. CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacological treatment optimization is associated with LVRR in approximately half of cases, reducing potential ICD indications in parallel. However, ischemic cardiomyopathy, prolonged HF duration, and larger LVEDDI predict the absence of LVRR and favor ICD implantation without delay. The risk score based on the former predictors may help the clinician with the timing of ICD implantation.

Heterogeneity of aortic disease severity in patients with Loeys-Dietz syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine aortic disease severity in patients with Loeys-Dietz syndrome (LDS). METHODS: Thirty-three patients with LDS diagnosed and followed up at our unit were included. After reviewing all family trees, 25 deceased family members with clear clinical suspicion of having had LDS were also included. Clinical presentation, aortic dilation rate by echocardiography and age at aortic surgery, dissection or death were determined. RESULTS: Median aortic diameter at diagnosis was 36 mm, 43% of the patients aged >40 years had a z-score <2. Median aortic root dilation rate was 0.67 mm/year (maximum 2.0 mm/year) over a median follow-up of 2 years (IQR 1.0-4.0). In the global cohort, 31/58 patients reached a clinical endpoint; 19% death, median age: 52 years; 14% dissection, median age: 36 years; 21% aortic surgery, median age: 53 years. As expected, probands had a higher z-score (2.9 vs 1.5, p=0.019) and more often required aortic surgery (33.4% vs 18.2%, p=0.035) compared with family members. TGFBR2 carriers had a higher z-score compared with TGFBR1 carriers (3.2 vs 1.5, p=0.034) and younger age at aortic surgery (HR 4.9, 95% CI 1.5 to 123, p=0.026). Craniofacial severity index was inversely correlated with age at first event (r=-0.765, p=0.045). CONCLUSIONS: Although paediatric patients were not properly represented in our cohort, our patients with LDS presented a significant heterogeneity in the severity of aortic disease with large intrafamilial and interfamilial variability, aortic root aneurysm were less frequent and aortic complications less premature than previously depicted. Furthermore, aortic dilation rate was similar to that reported in Marfan syndrome and aortic root diameters appear to be larger in TGFBR2 carriers.