COVID-19 impact, resilience, and child quality of life: A dyadic analysis.

COVID-19 public health measures caused significant disruptions to child and caregivers' mental and physical well-being, including quality of life (QoL). However, in samples outside the United States (U.S.), greater resilience has been linked to lower COVID-19 impact on child QoL. Thus, understanding individual and dyadic factors contributing to resilience and QoL during COVID-19 within the United States may provide important insight for points of intervention. This study aimed to characterize the interdependent effects of child and caregiver COVID-19 impact on child and caregiver resilience, as well as on child-reported and caregiver proxy-reported child QoL. U.S. caregivers (n = 231; 95.7% female) and their 8-17-year-old children (n = 231; 54.5% male; Mage = 11.87; SDage = 2.66) reported their COVID-19 impact between May and July 2020 (T1). Follow-up self-reports on resilience and child QoL occurred between November 2020 and January 2021 (T2). Two actor-partner interdependence models (APIM) and one actor-partner interdependence mediation model (APIMeM) assessed associations among caregiver and child COVID-19 impact, resilience, and QoL. An APIM revealed significant negative actor and partner effects of COVID-19 impact on child self-reported and caregiver proxy-reported child QoL. Another APIM revealed an actor effect from COVID-19 impact to one's own resilience. The APIMeM revealed two indirect effects revealing that when children or caregivers reported greater levels of T1 COVID-19 impact, it was associated with lower levels of T2 child-reported resilience, which was subsequently associated with lower T2 child-reported QoL. Findings suggested that both child and caregiver perceptions of the pandemic were important for their own and the others' resilience, as well as child QoL. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

Certified Child Life Specialist role in implementation of individualized coping plans for children receiving botulinum toxin injections.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this paper is to describe the implementation of evidence-based, individualized coping plans and to compare the rates of child anxiety, child cooperation, and parent anxiety before and after implementation of these coping plans for children receiving recurring BoNT-A injections emphasizing the role of Certified Child Life Specialists (CCLSs) within the interdisciplinary team approach. DESIGN AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted for children receiving BoNT-A injections at a Physical Medicine clinic pre- and post-implementation of the coping plan. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate care plan implementation, child cooperation, child anxiety, and parent anxiety. RESULTS: Post-implementation of coping care plans, children experienced improved cooperation during BoNT-A injections. Parental anxiety decreased once coping plans were implemented. Documentation improved after the implementation of coping plans specific to areas involving cooperation, child's anxiety and distress, and parental anxiety and distress. It was also noted that there was an increase in child anxiety assessments within documentation. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: CCLS were able to utilize their expertise to collaboratively create individualized coping care plans to increase child's cooperation and decrease parental anxiety during BoNT-A injections.

An Exploration of COVID-19 Impact and Vaccine Hesitancy in Parents of Pediatric Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant (HCT) Recipients.

There is paucity of data on COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy amongst parents of pediatric (age ≤ 17 years) hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) recipients. We conducted a cross-sectional study to determined COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy, and COVID-19 impact on family and related distress in this population. A national group (n = 80) was recruited via social media (Facebook) from February-May 2021. With vaccine approval for ≥12 years in July 2021, a second group (n = 37) was recruited locally. Parents completed surveys including the Vaccine Hesitancy Questionnaire and COVID-19 Exposure and Family Impact Scale (CEFIS). Nonparametric statistics were used to analyze results and factors impacting Vaccine Hesitancy Scores (VHS). The majority of parents were non-Hispanic White (≥90%) and children ≥3 months post-HCT (85%). Mean CEFIS score (scale 0-60) was 41.11 (SD = 8.24), with higher scores indicating negative impact of the pandemic. Mean (± standard deviation) VHS was 2.87 (±0.79) on a scale of 1-4, with 1 indicating higher and 4 lower hesitancy. Concerns about vaccine related side effects, lower parental age, child age, household income, and education were associated with lower VHS. Receiving reliable information and recommendations by providers was associated with higher VHS. Improving vaccine acceptance in this population is critical in protecting pediatric HCT recipients.