Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
1.
J Hosp Infect ; 56(3): 223-7, 2004 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15003671

ABSTRACT

The aim of the study was to determine the risk factors for acquiring brucella infection among healthcare workers (HCWs). The study was performed in Ankara Numune Education and Research Hospital, Turkey, before the introduction of Biosafety III measures. A questionnaire was given to HCWs, who were at risk of brucella infection. Twelve HCWs with brucella infection were detected, an incidence of 8% per employee-year. A multivariate analysis of risk factors in seven of the cases and 48 control HCWs was performed. Male physicians were found to be associated with a higher risk of acquiring brucella infection [odds ratio, 25.3; confidence interval (CI), 2.3-283.7; P=0.008]. Using gloves was found to be protective (odds ratio, 0.02; CI, 0.008-0.4; P=0.017).


Subject(s)
Brucellosis/transmission , Health Personnel , Laboratories , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Risk Factors
3.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 45(5): 695-9, 2000 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10797096

ABSTRACT

With the participation of eight major reference hospitals in Turkey, 749 aerobic Gram-negative isolates obtained from 473 intensive care patients in 1997 were tested for their susceptibility to 13 commonly employed antibacterial agents. The frequency with which species were isolated and resistance rates were compared with data from the previous 2 years. Imipenem was the most active agent against the majority of isolates (75%), followed by ciprofloxacin, cefepime and amikacin. The per cent susceptibility to all antibiotics declined from 1995 to 1996. With the exception of imipenem, for which there was no change in resistance, the per cent susceptibility somewhat increased in 1997. However, it was still lower than in 1995.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Gram-Negative Bacteria/drug effects , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/epidemiology , Intensive Care Units , Drug Resistance, Microbial , Gram-Negative Bacteria/isolation & purification , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/microbiology , Humans , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Population Surveillance , Turkey/epidemiology
4.
Mikrobiyol Bul ; 27(3): 211-5, 1993 Jul.
Article in Turkish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8361409

ABSTRACT

Using a broth microtiter dilution method, the minimum inhibitory concentrations of antipseudomonal antibiotics were determined against 19 P. aeruginosa isolates. Two different concentration of inoculum, 10(5) and 10(8), were used to show the inoculum concentration effect of in vitro antibiotic susceptibility tests. On the basis of the MIC values and using Howard B.J. (1) breakpoints, the effect of inoculum density was most prominent for amikacin and aztreonam, intermediate for mezlocillin, ticarcillin, piperacillin, cefotaxime, cefoperazone, netilmicin, tobramycin, gentamicin, and least apparent for ciprofloxacin and carbenicillin respectively.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/drug effects , Colony Count, Microbial , Humans , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/growth & development
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...