Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 102
Filter
1.
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being ; 19(1): 2287621, 2024 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38055785

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess how self-compassion affects the psychological well-being of radiographers at work. METHODS: An online survey was sent to radiology and radiotherapy departments in Rhône-Alpes, a region of France (from October 2021 to February 2022). The study is mixed: quantitative data, with closed questions and two validated scales, and qualitative data, with open questions aimed at assessing perceptions among radiologists as regards self-compassion. RESULTS: A total of 253 radiographers (mean age 32.9 years), took part in this survey. Radiographers reported a poor level of well-being and a moderate level of self-compassion. We found a link between well-being at work and self-compassion. Gender, age, number of years of experience and the desire to receive training on well-being appear to have an impact on the level of self-compassion. The perception of self-compassion by radiologists is essentially positive. CONCLUSION: Particular attention should be paid to radiologists who are female, young, and with only a few years of experience. Self-compassion is a protective factor for radiologists and may help them take care of themselves to continue caring for others. Training related to self-compassion should be promoted in medical imaging departments.


Subject(s)
Allied Health Personnel , Psychological Well-Being , Radiology , Self-Compassion , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Allied Health Personnel/psychology , France , Radiology/education
2.
Bull Cancer ; 110(7-8): 768-775, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36872128

ABSTRACT

Since radiotherapy discovery, prediction of biological response to ionizing radiation remains a major challenge. Indeed, several radiobiological models appeared through radiotherapy history. Nominal single dose so popular in the 1970s, was tragically linked to the dark years in radiobiology by underestimating the late toxicity of the high-dose fractions. The actual prominent linear-quadratic model continues to prove to be an effective tool in radiobiology. Mainly with its pivotal α/ß ratio, which gives a reliable estimate of tissues sensitivity to fractions. Despite these arguments, this model experiences limitations with substantial doubts of α/ß ratio values. Interestingly, the story of radiobiology since X-ray discovery is truly instructive and teaches modern clinicians to refine fractionation schemes. Many fractionation schemes have been tested with successes or dramas. This review retraces radiobiological models' history, and confronts these models to new fractionation schemes, drawing a preventive message.


Subject(s)
Models, Biological , Radiobiology , Humans , Dose Fractionation, Radiation , Linear Models , Odds Ratio
3.
Cancer Invest ; 41(2): 109-118, 2023 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36278830

ABSTRACT

Scarce data investigate the impact of radiotherapy (RT) on biology markers. An analysis of ancillary study of RIT (Radiation Impact on Thromboembolic events) prospective trial was carried out. All patients with non-metastatic solid tumors and treated with radiotherapy and/or brachytherapy in curative and consenting to have blood samples were included. A significant decrease in white blood count, (i.e. lymphocytes, monocytes, neutrophils and basophils) and platelet counts was observed after RT and maintained at 6 months. Whereas, eosinophils, D-dimers and hemoglobin levels were affected respectively 3 months and 6 months after RT initiation. Conversely, red cells count and CRP level were not affected by RT. This study is an advocacy to develop an understanding of basic immune system in relation with RT.


Subject(s)
Brachytherapy , Neoplasms , Humans , Prospective Studies , Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Neoplasms/pathology , Neutrophils , Lymphocytes
4.
Biodivers Data J ; 11: e98627, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38327303

ABSTRACT

Background: Amongst the genus Rumina, R.paivae was decribed from North Africa for the first time by Lowe in 1861 on the basis of a limited number of samples. During the 19th and 20th centuries, it was described several times, under different names and different ranks leading to a taxonomic imbroglio before being forgotten. In 2002, Mienis rehabilitated R.paivae, but Prevot et al. (2013, 2014) considered it as a large phenotype of R.decollata Linnaeus (1758) on the basis of genetic and anatomical studies. New information: In this study, we present morphological and anatomical comparisons and differences between two groups of shells collected in France and considered as R.decollata. Using seven morphological characters related to the size and one to the microscopic sculptures of the shell and two related to the eggs and the colours of the morphs, we attribute these two groups to two morphologically described species: R.paivae and R.decollata. We propose a way to easily distinguish them from each other. With regard to their distribution, morphology and genetics, we discuss their relative systematic position. Moreover, in this study, we report for the first time R.paivae, a given north African taxa, in the south-ast of France, in Marseille.

5.
Bull Cancer ; 109(12): 1262-1268, 2022 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36283891

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The necessity to perform 18FDG PET-CT both for initial tumour staging and for target volume delineation in head and neck cancers seems well established. The aim of the present study is to advocate the place and role of 18FDG PET-CT acquired in planning treatment position (18FDG PET-CT/RT). METHODS: Between March 2018 and July 2019, 22 patients with a squamous cell head and neck carcinoma treated by EBRT were included in the analysis. All these consecutive patients had a 18FDG PET-CT/RT. Three GTV volumes were defined. First, "GTV 40%" corresponded to 40% of SUVmax. "Visual GTV" was defined as the tumor volume obtained from the PET the nuclear medicine physician interpreted. The radiation oncologist used the medical record, clinical anatomy, CT simulation and 18FDG PET-CT/RT data ("GTV40%" and "visual GTV") to draw the GTV. RESULTS: Mean GTVs and mean "GTVs40%" were significantly different (P<0.001) with an intraclass index of 0.734. Mean "GTV40%" and mean "visual GTVs" were also significantly different (P<0.001) with an intraclass index of 0.72. Conversely, the difference between mean GTVs and mean "visual GTVs" were not significant (P=0.11) with an intraclass index of 0.91. Mean DICE between "GTVs40%" and GTV was 0.7 (ranging from 0.2 to 0.9). The mean intersection between GTVs and "visual GTVs" volumes was 0.8 (ranging from 0.4 to 1). The difference between DICES was significant (P=0.015), "visual GTV"/GTV DICE was the smallest. CONCLUSION: 18FDG PET-CT/RT definitely remains the imaging modality that individualized/customized head and neck cancer treatment needs.


Subject(s)
Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 , Head and Neck Neoplasms , Humans , Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography , Radiopharmaceuticals , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Positron-Emission Tomography , Head and Neck Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Head and Neck Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted/methods
6.
Cancer Med ; 11(8): 1753-1762, 2022 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35199492

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Thromboembolic events frequently complicate the course of malignancy and represent a major cause of morbidity and mortality in cancer patients. In contrast to chemotherapy and other systemic therapies, little is known about the impact of ionizing radiations on the incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in cancer patients. METHODS: In the present prospective study, we aimed to investigate the incidence, management, and outcome of VTE in newly diagnosed cancer patients who received curative radiotherapy. RESULTS: VTE was found in 8 patients, out of 401 patients at a median time of 80 days after radiotherapy initiation. The incidence rate of VTE at 6 months post-treatment was 2% (95% CI, 0.9-3.7), with 50% of cases occurring during the radiotherapy course and 50% of cases in patients who received or were receiving chemotherapy. As none of the patients harbored a personal history of VTE, no prophylactic measure was initiated during cancer therapy. Most patients received monotherapy with low-molecular-weight heparin and were still on surveillance at the end of the study. No specific clinical risk factor was identified that might systematically indicate the need of thromboprophylaxis in the context of curative radiotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Although this pan-cancer descriptive study did not relate an increased risk of short-term thrombosis following ionizing radiation, it provides important insight as a basis for future studies with subcategories of cancer, in order to in fine guide further recommendations in frail patients. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02696447.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms , Thrombosis , Venous Thromboembolism , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Humans , Neoplasms/complications , Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Prospective Studies , Venous Thromboembolism/drug therapy , Venous Thromboembolism/epidemiology , Venous Thromboembolism/etiology
7.
Radiother Oncol ; 168: 23-27, 2022 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35065997

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Limited data are available about non-anticancer treatment (NACTs)/radiation combinations. MORSE 02-17 was the first study to report on the interaction resulting from such combinations in a heterogeneous population. Therefore, the aim of this study was to describe acute and late toxicities in a homogenous cohort of cancer patients receiving NACTs and undergoing radiation therapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An analysis of the RIT (Radiation Impact on Thromboembolic events) prospective trial was carried-out. Patients with non-metastatic solid tumors and treated with radiotherapy and/or brachytherapy in a curative intent between 2016 and 2019 were included. Data about NACTs and toxicities were then collected. RESULTS: Out of 382 patients, 293 were prescribed NACTs (76.7%) with a median number of 3.6 (range: 1-14) NACTs per patient. Among1006 NACTs, the most prescribed drugs were anti-hypertensive, in 153 patients (52.2%). In accordance with MORSE 02-17 data, four of the main side effects of radiotherapy were analysed: genitourinary, gastrointestinal, dermatitis/mucositis and fatigue. Regarding acute and late toxicities -whatever the grade- no statistical difference was found between NACTs classes and these toxicities. CONCLUSION: When we compared the rates of toxicities with literature data, NACTs did not seem to have a worsening effect. One could conclude that NACTs concomitantly given with RT do not influence toxicity outcome. We then advocate a development of new platform for toxicity profile investigation of drugs-RT combination.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents , Brachytherapy , Neoplasms , Brachytherapy/methods , Humans , Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Prospective Studies , Urogenital System
8.
Swiss Med Wkly ; 151: w30034, 2021 12 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34964579

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This retrospective study was conducted to: (1) provide more modern data on real-life local management of metastatic rectal cancer; (2) compare therapeutic strategies; and (3) identify prognostic factors of local failure, overall survival and progression-free survival. METHODS: Data about efficacy and acute toxicity were collected. Patients were diagnosed with metastatic rectal cancer between 2004 and 2015, and were treated at least with radiotherapy. Local failure, overall survival and progression-free survival were correlated with patient, tumour and treatment characteristics using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: Data of 148 consecutive patients with metastatic rectal cancer were analysed. Median follow-up was 19 months. Median overall survival was 16 months. All patients received local radiotherapy, with a median equivalent 2 Gy per fraction dose of 47.7 Gy. Rectal surgery was performed in 97 patients (65.6%). The majority of patients (86/97, 88.7%) received pre-operative chemoradiation. In multivariate analysis, rectal surgery was found to be the only independent predictor of increased overall survival (24.6 vs 7.1 months, p <0.001). Of the patients undergoing surgical treatment, 22.8% presented with significant complications that required a delay of systemic treatment. Grade 3-4 acute radiation therapy-related toxicities were observed in 6.1% of patients, mainly gastrointestinal toxicities (5.4%). CONCLUSION: Rectal surgery was a key predictive factor of increased progression-free survival and overall survival in patients receiving at least local radiotherapy. In our series of real-life patients, local surgery and radiation seemed as well tolerated as reported in selected phase III non-metastatic rectal cancer patients. These data suggested that local management could be beneficial for metastatic rectal cancer patients.


Subject(s)
Digestive System Surgical Procedures , Rectal Neoplasms , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Humans , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/drug therapy , Neoplasm Staging , Prognosis , Rectal Neoplasms/therapy , Retrospective Studies
9.
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol ; 147(7): 1905-1916, 2021 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33791846

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The clinical outcome of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) remains poor, partly due to the presence of resistant cancer stem cells (CSCs) which are responsible of recurrences. CSCs have low EGFR expression and, conversely, overexpress the anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 protein, which is involved in resistance to apoptosis and the invasion/migration capacities of tumour cells. METHODS: The combination therapy of ABT-199, a Bcl-2 inhibitor, cetuximab an EGFR inhibitor, and radiation using an HNSCC model (SQ20B cell line) and its corresponding CSC subpopulation were evaluated in vitro (2D/3D cell proliferation; invasion/migration and apoptosis using videomicroscopy) and in vivo. RESULTS: Cetuximab strongly inhibited 2D and 3D cell proliferation, as well as invasion/migration, only in non-CSC-SQ20B cells, whereas ABT-199 selectively inhibited these mechanisms in SQ20B/CSCs. The combination of irradiation + cetuximab + ABT-199 increased the inhibition of the 2D and 3D cell proliferation, invasion/migration, and resistance to apoptosis in both cell sub-populations. In addition, in a nude mouse model with heterotopic tumour xenograft, a treatment combining cetuximab + ABT-199 with fractional irradiation strongly delayed the tumour growth and increased in vivo lifespan without side effects. CONCLUSION: Based on the present results, this triple combination therapy may represent a new opportunity for testing in clinical trials, particularly in locally advanced HNSCC.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/pharmacology , Chemoradiotherapy/methods , Head and Neck Neoplasms/therapy , Neoplastic Stem Cells/pathology , Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcl-2/antagonists & inhibitors , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/therapy , Animals , Apoptosis , Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, Heterocyclic/administration & dosage , Cell Movement , Cell Proliferation , Cetuximab/administration & dosage , ErbB Receptors/antagonists & inhibitors , Female , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic , Head and Neck Neoplasms/metabolism , Head and Neck Neoplasms/pathology , Humans , Mice , Mice, Inbred NOD , Mice, SCID , Neoplastic Stem Cells/drug effects , Neoplastic Stem Cells/metabolism , Neoplastic Stem Cells/radiation effects , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/metabolism , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/pathology , Sulfonamides/administration & dosage , Tumor Cells, Cultured , Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays
10.
BMC Oral Health ; 21(1): 220, 2021 04 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33926421

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Oral mucositis (OM) is a severe complication cancer patients undergo when treated with chemoradiotherapy. Photobiomodulation (PBM) therapy also known as low-level laser therapy has been increasingly used for the treatment of such oral toxicity. The aim of this review is to discuss the mechanisms of photobiomodulation (PBM) regarding OM prevention and treatment, and more precisely to focus on the effect of PBM on tumor and healthy cells. METHODS: MEDLINE/PubMed, and google scholar were searched electronically. Selected studies were focusing on PBM effects on tumor and healthy cells. RESULTS: PBM interactions with the tissue and additional mechanism in OM therapy were detailed in this review. Moreover, this review highlighted a controversy about the carcinogenic effect of PBM. Indeed, Many studies reported that PBM could enhance malignant cell proliferation; suggesting that PBM would have no protective effect. In addition to acting on cancer cells, PBM may damage healthy cells. CONCLUSION: More prospective studies are needed to assess the effect of PBM on cancer cells in order to improve its use for OM prevention and treatment.


Subject(s)
Low-Level Light Therapy , Neoplasms , Stomatitis , Chemoradiotherapy , Humans , Prospective Studies , Stomatitis/etiology , Stomatitis/prevention & control
11.
Nucl Med Commun ; 42(3): 234-243, 2021 Mar 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33252513

ABSTRACT

PET-computed tomography (CT) plays a growing role to guide target volume delineation for head and neck cancer in radiation oncology. Pretherapeutic [18F]FDG PET-CT adds information to morphological imaging. First, as a whole-body imaging modality, it reveals regional or distant metastases that induce major therapeutic changes in more than 10% of the cases. Moreover, it allows better pathological lymph node selection which improves overall regional control and overall survival. Second, locally, it allows us to define the metabolic tumoral volume, which is a reliable prognostic feature for survival outcome. [18F]FDG PET-CT-based gross tumor volume (GTV) is on average significantly smaller than GTV based on CT. Nevertheless, the overlap is incomplete and more evaluation of composite GTV based on PET and GTV based on CT are needed. However, in clinical practice, the study showed that using GTV PET alone for treatment planning was similar to using GTVCT for local control and dose distribution was better as a dose to organs at risk significantly decreased. In addition to FDG, pretherapeutic PET could give access to different biological tumoral volumes - thanks to different tracers - guiding heterogeneous dose delivery (dose painting concept) to resistant subvolumes. During radiotherapy treatment, follow-up [18F]FDG PET-CT revealed an earlier and more important diminution of GTV than other imaging modality. It may be a valuable support for adaptative radiotherapy as a new treatment plan with a significant impact on dose distribution became possible. Finally, additional studies are required to prospectively validate long-term outcomes and lower toxicity resulting from the use of PET-CT in treatment planning.


Subject(s)
Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 , Head and Neck Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Head and Neck Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged
12.
Lasers Med Sci ; 36(7): 1445-1454, 2021 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33169275

ABSTRACT

Photobiomodulation-based (PBM-based) therapies show promising results in mucositis and dermatitis treatment by stimulating wound healing mechanisms such as cell proliferation and migration. The aim of the present study is to investigate the in vitro effects of CareMin650 on the proliferation and migration of two different types of cells, namely cancer and non-cancer cells, with or without X-ray radiation. Study design used PBM through a combination of 0-3-6 J/cm2 doses-with or without X-ray radiation-on the proliferation and migration capabilities of a keratinocyte cell line (HaCaT) and a squamous cell carcinoma line (SCC61). PBM is delivered by a new woven optical fiber device, namely CareMin650 prototype (light emission by LEDs (light-emitting diodes), peak at 660 nm, irradiance of 21.6 mW/cm2). The effectiveness of PBM to increase HaCaT proliferation and migration (with or without X-ray radiation) supports the capability of PBM to favor wound healing. It also highlights that PBM does not provide any anti-radiation effect to previously X-rays radiated SCC (p < 0.001). Such data supports the beneficial effect of PBM delivered by an optical fiber device to heal wounds, without promoting cancer development.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell , Low-Level Light Therapy , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/radiotherapy , Cell Proliferation , Humans , Keratinocytes , Optical Fibers , X-Rays
14.
Br J Cancer ; 123(3): 339-348, 2020 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32581341

ABSTRACT

Radiotherapy is a pivotal component in the curative treatment of patients with localised cancer and isolated metastasis, as well as being used as a palliative strategy for patients with disseminated disease. The clinical efficacy of radiotherapy has traditionally been attributed to the local effects of ionising radiation, which induces cell death by directly and indirectly inducing DNA damage, but substantial work has uncovered an unexpected and dual relationship between tumour irradiation and the host immune system. In clinical practice, it is, therefore, tempting to tailor immunotherapies with radiotherapy in order to synergise innate and adaptive immunity against cancer cells, as well as to bypass immune tolerance and exhaustion, with the aim of facilitating tumour regression. However, our understanding of how radiation impacts on immune system activation is still in its early stages, and concerns and challenges regarding therapeutic applications still need to be overcome. With the increasing use of immunotherapy and its common combination with ionising radiation, this review briefly delineates current knowledge about the non-targeted effects of radiotherapy, and aims to provide insights, at the preclinical level, into the mechanisms that are involved with the potential to yield clinically relevant combinatorial approaches of radiotherapy and immunotherapy.


Subject(s)
Bystander Effect , Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Tumor Escape/radiation effects , Adaptive Immunity/radiation effects , Animals , Humans , Immunity, Innate/radiation effects , Neoplasms/immunology , Radioimmunotherapy
15.
Br J Radiol ; 93(1109): 20190147, 2020 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31971824

ABSTRACT

Concerns have been raised about potential toxic interactions when colony-stimulating factors (CSFs) and chemoradiation are concurrently performed. In 2006, the ASCO guidelines advised against their concomitant use. Nevertheless, with the development of modern radiotherapy techniques and supportive care, the therapeutic index of combined chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and CSFs is worth reassessing. Recent clinical trials testing chemoradiation in lung cancer let investigators free to decide the use of concomitant CSFs or not. No abnormal infield event was reported after the use of modern radiotherapy techniques and concomitant chemotherapy regimens. These elements call for further investigation to set new recommendations in favour of the association of chemoradiation and CSFs. Moreover, radiotherapy could induce anticancer systemic effects mediated by the immune system in vitro and in vivo. With combined CSFs, this effect was reinforced in preclinical and clinical trials introducing innovative radioimmunotherapy models. So far, the association of radiation with CSFs has not been combined with immunotherapy. However, it might play a major role in triggering an immune response against cancer cells, leading to abscopal effects. The present article reassesses the therapeutic index of the combination CSFs-chemoradiation through an updated review on its safety and efficacy. It also provides a special focus on radioimmunotherapy.


Subject(s)
Chemoradiotherapy/adverse effects , Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor/adverse effects , Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor/adverse effects , Animals , Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic , Combined Modality Therapy , Disease Models, Animal , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/therapy , Mice , Radioimmunotherapy/adverse effects , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Small Cell Lung Carcinoma/therapy
16.
Bull Cancer ; 107(2): 244-253, 2020 Feb.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31864665

ABSTRACT

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is a young technology that can deliver a high dose of radiation to the target, utilizing either a single dose or a small number of fractions with a high degree of precision within the body. Various technical solutions co-exist nowadays, with particular features, possibilities and limitations. Health care authorities have currently validated SBRT in a very limited number of locations, but many indications are still under investigation. It is therefore challenging to accurately appreciate the SBRT therapeutic index, its place and its role within the anticancer therapeutic arsenal. The aim of the present review is to provide SBRT definitions, current indications, and summarize the future ways of research. There are three validated indications for SBRT: un-resecable T1-T2 non small cell lung cancer, <3 slow-growing pulmonary metastases secondary to a stabilized primary, and the tumours located close to the medulla. In other situations, the benefit of SBRT is still to be demonstrated. One of the most promising way of research is the ablative treatment of oligo metastatic cancers, with recent studies suggesting a survival benefit. Furthermore, the most recent data suggest that SBRT is safe. Finally, the SBRT combined with immune therapies is promising, since it could theoretically trigger the adaptative anticancer response.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Radiosurgery , Adrenal Gland Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Adrenal Gland Neoplasms/secondary , Brain Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Brain Neoplasms/secondary , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/radiotherapy , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/radiotherapy , Combined Modality Therapy/methods , Forecasting , Humans , Immunotherapy/methods , Kidney Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Liver Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Liver Neoplasms/secondary , Lung Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Lung Neoplasms/secondary , Pancreatic Neoplasms , Radiosurgery/methods , Radiosurgery/trends , Radiotherapy Dosage , Spinal Cord Neoplasms/radiotherapy
17.
Oncology ; 97(3): 125-134, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31266037

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to identify and compare prognostic factors, management strategies, and outcomes of very locally advanced cervical cancer (CC) (i.e., stage IVA) and metastatic CC (i.e., stage IVB). METHOD: A retrospective review was conducted based on all consecutive patients treatedfor stage IV CC in a comprehensive cancer care centre between 2004 and 2017. RESULTS: Sixty-eight patients were included. Performance status (PS) was ≥2 for 35.9%. Median age at diagnosis was 60.5. There were 24 stage IVA CC (35.3%) and 44 stage IVB CC (64.7%). Seventeen patients with stage IVB CC had only para-aortic lymph node metastases (38.6%), 13 had only distant metastases (29.5%), and 14 had both (31.8%). Patients with stage IVA CC experienced a radiotherapy with curative intent (n = 14, 58.3%) +/- concomitant chemotherapy, or a palliative treatment (n = 10, 41.7%). Twenty-three patients with stage IVB CC received a prior chemotherapy (52.3%), 11 a primary concomitant chemoradiation (25%), and 10 a palliative treatment (22.7%). The mean follow-up was 18.0 months. The 5-year overall survival was 5.1% for stage IVA (95% CI = 0.7-33.9), and 10.5% for stage IVB (95% CI = 3.7-29.7). In multivariate analysis, PS >1 was identified as a poor prognostic factor of disease-specific survival for stage IVA CC. PS >1 and pelvic lymph node involvement were identified as poor prognostic factors of overall survival and disease-specific survival for stage IVB CC. CONCLUSIONS: In daily clinical practice, outcomes of stages IV CC are poor. Treatment of advanced and metastatic CC remains challenging. New management strategies are needed, as well as efficient preventive strategies.


Subject(s)
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/mortality , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/pathology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Combined Modality Therapy , Comorbidity , Female , France/epidemiology , Humans , Middle Aged , Multimodal Imaging , Neoplasm Metastasis , Neoplasm Staging , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/epidemiology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/therapy
18.
Acta Oncol ; 58(8): 1158-1162, 2019 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31074314

ABSTRACT

Background: Phase II trials are designed to assess the efficacy/toxicity ratio of experimental treatments and select those worth being tested in phase III trials. Although crucial limitations were identified when concurrent chemoradiation (cCRT) phase III trials characteristics were assessed, features of cCRT phase II trials have never been reported. The objective was to describe features of all cCRT phase II trials. Methods and material: Requests were performed in the Medline database (via PubMed). The latest update was performed in April 2016, using the following MESH terms: 'clinical trials: phase II as topic', 'chemoradiotherapy'. Results: Four hundred and fifty-eight cCRT phase II trials were identified. They were mainly multicenter (51.5%), single arm studies (77.7%) published after 2011 (55.0%). The median number of included patients was 52. Primary endpoints were mainly response rate (20.5%), pathological complete response (14.4%) and overall survival (12.6%). The primary endpoint was not defined in 22% of studies. Tumors were mostly lung (23.1%), head and neck (20.3%), colorectal (16.6%) and esophagogastric cancer (14.6%) treated at a locally advanced setting (81.7%). 55.2% of trials used 3D-conformal radiotherapy and 9.1% intensity-modulated radiotherapy, mainly with normo-fractionation (82.0% of the 573 arms with radiotherapy). Radiation technique was not reported in 19.9% of studies. Associated anticancer drugs (563 arms) were mainly conventional chemotherapies (559 arms): cisplatin (46.2%) and 5-fluorouracil (28.3%). Non cytotoxic agents (targeted therapies, immunotherapies) were tested in 97 arms (17%). With a median follow-up of 31 months, acute grades 3-5 were reported in 98.5% of studies and late toxicities in 44.5%. Follow-up was not reported in 17% of studies. Conclusions: cCRT phase II trials featured severe limitations, with outdated radiation techniques, insufficient reporting of crucial data and a small number of included patients. This certainly limited the impact of conclusions and hindered the development of successful phase III trials.


Subject(s)
Chemoradiotherapy/adverse effects , Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic , Neoplasms/therapy , Therapies, Investigational/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Chemoradiotherapy/methods , Dose Fractionation, Radiation , Humans , Multicenter Studies as Topic , Neoplasms/mortality , Radiotherapy, Conformal/adverse effects , Therapies, Investigational/methods , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
19.
Bull Cancer ; 106(5): 479-491, 2019 May.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31023481

ABSTRACT

Complementary and alternative medicines (CAMs) play more and more a significant role both in France and all over the world. Yet, their definition and their role in cancer treatments legitimately raise concerns. This article aims at establishing a picture of the CAMs admitted by the French Medical Board as well as those which are new or in common medical practices in France. We start with a brief reminder of their origin, their status and how they are used. Then, we review the literature about some of the best clinical trials using CAMs in cancer patients. To finish, we try to understand what makes CAMs so thrilling, but also why they create controversy and which common points they may have with conventional medicine.


Subject(s)
Complementary Therapies , Neoplasms/therapy , Acupuncture Therapy , Homeopathy , Humans
20.
Bull Cancer ; 106(4): 342-353, 2019 Apr.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30853114

ABSTRACT

Endocrine treatment represents the cornerstone of endocrine-sensitive pre-menopausal early breast cancer. The estrogen blockade plays a leading role in the therapeutic management with surgery, radiotherapy and selective antiestrogen treatment. For several years, selective estrogen receptor modulators, such as tamoxifen, have revolutionized medical care of hormone receptors-positive breast cancer and have conquered the therapeutic arsenal while becoming the gold standard of treatment. Other combinations associating the ovarian function suppression using LHRH agonists with tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitors have been recently investigated, leading to mitigated opinions regarding the clinical benefit of these associations. We propose here a comprehensive overview on existing data and their actualization concerning LHRH analogues, whilst emphasizing benefit-risk balance for this targeted population.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal/therapeutic use , Aromatase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone/analogs & derivatives , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Premenopause , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Female , Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone/agonists , Humans , Ovary/drug effects , Risk Assessment , Tamoxifen/therapeutic use
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...