Midwives' attitudes toward participation of pregnant individuals in a preventive vaccine hypothetical clinical trial.

INTRODUCTION: Pregnant individuals are frequently excluded from clinical trials. Yet, inclusion of Pregnant individuals is of interest in vaccinology including during health crisis. Promotion of clinical trials by midwives may facilitate the decision making of Pregnant individuals. Attitudes of midwives about pregnant individuals participation in a vaccine clinical trial have been little explored. METHODS: We conducted an anonymous survey from the 11th of September to the 11th of November 2020. Primary endpoint was the willingness to encourage Pregnant individuals to participate in a hypothetical respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccine clinical trial. RESULTS: Among 398 midwives who answered the questionnaire, 113 (28.3 %) were likely to encourage Pregnant individuals to participate in the vaccine clinical trial, this proportion ranged from 25 % in senior midwives to 34.5 % among the students. After adjustment on age, parenthood, previous personal attitudes of vaccine hesitancy, and psychological antecedents of vaccinations (5C-model), the only predictor of the promotion of the clinical trial was the experience of vaccine education (evaluated by a 20-point score) with an adjusted odds ratio of 1.09 (1.01-1.18, p = 0.027) for a one-point increase. Vaccine hesitancy and psychological antecedents of vaccinations were not associated with a lower promotion of pregnant individuals trial participation by midwives. CONCLUSION: Few respondents were likely to encourage Pregnant individuals to participate in a vaccine clinical trial. Midwives who considered themselves to have a good training about vaccines were more prone to encourage Pregnant individuals to participate in a RSV vaccine clinical trial.

Alfaxalone for total intravenous anaesthesia in bitches undergoing elective caesarean section and its effects on puppies: a randomized clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects and reliability of alfaxalone constant rate infusion (CRI) in comparison to isoflurane to maintain anaesthesia in bitches undergoing elective caesarean section. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, 'blinded' clinical trial. ANIMALS: Twenty-two client-owned bitches and 94 puppies. METHODS: Bitches were randomly assigned to receive an alfaxalone CRI [0.2 mg kg(-1)  minute(-1) intravenously (IV), and once the last puppy was delivered, the dose was halved; n = 11] or 2% (vaporizer dial setting) isoflurane (n = 11) for maintenance of anaesthesia. All dogs were induced with alfaxalone (3 mg kg(-1) ) IV. Additional alfaxalone (0.3 mg kg(-1) IV) was administered if the depth of anaesthesia was inadequate and the total dose was calculated. Bitches were mechanically ventilated. Analgesia was administered after the delivery of puppies. Physiological variables were recorded every 5 minutes. The bitches' recovery times were also recorded. Quality of induction and recovery were evaluated. Puppies' vigour was evaluated with a modified Apgar score at 5 and 60 minutes after birth. Puppies' survival rates at 24 and 48 hours and at 15 days were recorded. Data were analysed using an anova, Student's t-test or Wilcoxon rank-sum test. RESULTS: The rescue dose of alfaxalone was higher (p = 0.01); bitches' recoveries were longer (p < 0.001) and puppies' Apgar scores were significantly lower at 5 and 60 minutes (p < 0.001 and p = 0.003, respectively) with alfaxalone than with isoflurane. However, no significant differences were found for puppies' survival between groups. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Alfaxalone CRI seems to be a possible protocol for puppies and bitches undergoing elective caesarean sections. However, bitches recovered more slowly and puppy Apgar scores were lower in comparison to isoflurane.