Robotic Lobectomy Learning Curve Has Better Clinical Outcomes than Videothoracoscopic Lobectomy.

Introduction: The robotic-assisted (RATS) lobectomy learning curve is usually measured compared to an established videothoracoscopic (VATS) surgery program. The objective of our study is to compare the learning curves of both techniques. Methods: We performed an intention-to-treat analysis comparing the RATS vs. VATS lobectomies. Surgical time, conversions, complications, number of lymph nodes (LNs) and lymph node stations harvested, chest drainage duration, length of stay, readmissions, and 90-day mortality were compared between both groups. The learning curve was assessed using the CUSUM method. Results: RATS cases (30) and VATS cases (35) displayed no significant differences. The RATS learning curve was completed after 23 procedures while the VATS curve required 28 interventions. Complications appeared in four RATS procedures and in eight VATS patients. No differences in the number of LNs and harvested LN stations were reported. Four patients were readmitted in the RATS group, and eight in the VATS group. No 90-day postoperative mortality was observed in either group. The RATS group reported fewer chest tube days (3 (2-5) vs. 5 (4-5.8), p = 0.005) and hospital days (4 (3-6) vs. 5 (4-6), p = 0.023). Conclusions: The RATS curve appears shorter than the VATS curve. RATS lobectomies resulted in reduced chest tube duration and length of stay during the learning time period.

Starting a robotic thoracic surgery program: From wedge resection to sleeve lobectomy in six months. Initial conclusions / Inicio de un programa de cirugía torácica robótica: de resección en cuña a lobectomía con broncoplastia en seis meses. Conclusiones iniciales

Introduction: Robot-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) is a rapidly expanding technique. In our study, we aimed to analyze the results of the process to adopt robotic surgery in our Department of Thoracic Surgery. Methods: This is an intention-to-treat analysis of a series of consecutive patients operated on using the RATS approach in our hospital from January 2021 to March 2022. Data were registered for patient characteristics, type of surgery, operative times, conversion rate, chest tube duration, length of hospital stay and complications. The IBM SPSS® statistical software was used for the statistical analysis. A cumulative sum analysis of the operating time was performed to define the learning curve. Results: During the study period, 51 patients underwent robotic surgery, including pulmonary and non-pulmonary interventions. In addition, 15 patients (29.4%) underwent non-pulmonary interventions: one pleural (2%), 2 diaphragmatic (3.9%), and 12 mediastinal (23.5%). Among the mediastinal surgeries, one conversion was necessary (8.3%) for a complex vascular malformation, and 11 were completed by RATS, including 7 (58.3%) thymomas, 3 (25%) pleuro-pericardial cysts, and one (8.3%) neurogenic tumor. Mean operative time was 141 min (104–178), mean chest tube duration was 0.9 days (0–2), and mean length of stay was 1.45 days (1–2). Thirty-six patients underwent lung surgery (70.6%). The complete RATS resections (34; 94.4%) included: 3 wedge resections (11.1%), 2 segmentectomies (3.7%), 28 lobectomies (81.5%), and one sleeve lobectomy (3.7%). Mean surgery time was 194.56 min (141–247), chest tube duration was 3.92 days (1–8), and length of stay was 4.6 days (1–8). Complications occurred in 4 patients (11.1%). No 90-day mortalities were registered. (AU)

Introducción: La cirugía torácica asistida por robot (RATS) es una técnica en rápida expansión. Nuestro objetivo fue analizar el resultado del proceso de adopción de la cirugía robótica en nuestro Departamento de Cirugía Torácica. Métodos: Este es un análisis por intención de tratamiento de una serie de pacientes consecutivos operados mediante el método RATS en nuestro centro desde enero de 2021 a marzo de 2022. Se registraron las características de los pacientes, tipo de cirugía, tiempos operatorios, tasa de conversión, duración del drenaje torácico, estancia hospitalaria y complicaciones. Para el análisis estadístico se utilizó el software IBM SPSS®. Se realizó un análisis de suma acumulada del tiempo de operación para definir la curva de aprendizaje. Resultados: Durante el periodo de estudio, 51 pacientes fueron sometidos a cirugía robótica.15 pacientes (29,4%) fueron sometidos a intervenciones no pulmonares: 1 pleural (2%), 2 diafragmáticas (3,9%) y 12 mediastínicas (23,5%). Entre las cirugías mediastínicas, fue necesaria una conversión (8,3%) por malformación vascular compleja y 11 fueron completadas por RATS, incluidos 7 (58,3%) timomas, 3 (25%) quistes pleuro-pericárdicos y 1 (8,3%) tumores neurogénicos. El tiempo operatorio medio fue de 141 minutos [104–178], la duración media del tubo torácico fue de 0,9 días [0–2] y la estancia media fue de 1,45 días [1–2]. 36 pacientes tuvieron cirugías pulmonares (70,6%). Las resecciones RATS completas (34; 94,4%) incluyeron: 3 resecciones en cuña (11,1%), 2 segmentectomías (3,7%), 28 lobectomías (81,5%) y 1 lobectomía con broncoplastia (3,7%). El tiempo medio de cirugía fue de 194,56 minutos [141–247], la duración del tubo torácico fue de 3,92 días [1–8] y la estancia hospitalaria fue de 4,6 días [1–8]. No se registró mortalidad a los 90 días. (AU)

A look ahead to promote the early detection of lung cancer: technical and cost implications of a confirmed diagnosis before surgery / Una mirada al futuro para promover la detección temprana del Cáncer de Pulmón: implicaciones técnicas y económicas de tener un diagnóstico confirmado antes de la cirugía

Objective: To compare the costs and length of hospital stay among patients with a confirmed diagnosis of lung cancer (LC) prior to surgery versus those without confirmation. Methods: This retrospective, single-center study was conducted in patients who underwent a surgical procedure for LC, with or without a pathologically confirmed LC diagnosis prior to surgery, between March 2017 and December 2019. The main outcomes were costs and length of hospital stay (LOS). Results: Among the 269 patients who underwent surgery for lung cancer between March 2017 and December 2019, 203 (75.5%) patients underwent surgery due to a histopathological diagnosis, and 66 (24.5%) because of a Multidisciplinary Cancer Committee indication. The unadjusted mean cost was significantly lower in Group II (patients with surgery based on Multidisciplinary Cancer Committee criteria) (Є2,581.80 ± Є1,002.50) than in Group I (patients with histopathological diagnosis) (Є4,244.60 ± Є2,008.80), P < 0.0001. Once adjusted for covariables, there was a mean difference of −Є1,437.20 in the costs of Group II, P < 0.0001. Unadjusted mean hospital stay was significantly longer in Group I (5.6 days) than in Group II (3.5 days). Conclusions: The results suggest that indicating surgical resection of lung cancer based on Multidisciplinary Cancer Committee criteria, rather than performing CT-guided percutaneous lung biopsy, may result in a significant decrease in cost and length of hospital stay. (AU)

Objetivo: Comparar los costes y la duración de la estancia hospitalaria entre los pacientes con un diagnóstico confirmado de cáncer de pulmón (CP) antes de la cirugía frente a los que no lo tienen. Métodos: Estudio retrospectivo y unicéntrico realizado en pacientes que se sometieron a un procedimiento quirúrgico de CP, con o sin diagnóstico de CP confirmado patológicamente antes de la cirugía, entre marzo de 2017 y diciembre de 2019. Los principales resultados fueron los costes y la duración de la estancia hospitalaria (LOHS). Resultados: Entre los 269 pacientes sometidos a cirugía por cáncer de pulmón entre marzo de 2017 y diciembre de 2019, 203 (75,5%) pacientes se operan por diagnóstico histopatológico y 66 (24,5%) por indicación del Comité Oncológico Multidisciplinar. El coste medio no ajustado fue significativamente menor en el Grupo II (pacientes con intervención quirúrgica basada en criterios del Comité Multidisciplinar del Cáncer) (2.581,8 ± 1.002,5Є) que en el Grupo I (pacientes con diagnóstico histopatológico) (4.244,6Є ± 2.008,8), p < 0,0001. Una vez ajustados por covariables, hubo una diferencia media de −1.437,2Є en los costes del Grupo II, p < 0,0001. La estancia hospitalaria media no ajustada fue significativamente mayor en el Grupo I (5,6 días) que en el Grupo II (3,5 días). Conclusiones: Los resultados sugieren que indicar la resección quirúrgica del cáncer de pulmón basándose en los criterios del Comité Multidisciplinar del Cáncer, en lugar de realizar una biopsia pulmonar percutánea guiada por TAC, puede suponer una disminución significativa del coste y de la duración de la estancia hospitalaria. (AU)

A look ahead to promote the early detection of lung cancer: technical and cost implications of a confirmed diagnosis before surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the costs and length of hospital stay among patients with a confirmed diagnosis of lung cancer (LC) prior to surgery versus those without confirmation. METHODS: This retrospective, single-center study was conducted in patients who underwent a surgical procedure for LC, with or without a pathologically confirmed LC diagnosis prior to surgery, between March 2017 and December 2019. The main outcomes were costs and length of hospital stay (LOS). RESULTS: Among the 269 patients who underwent surgery for lung cancer between March 2017 and December 2019, 203 (75.5%) patients underwent surgery due to a histopathological diagnosis, and 66 (24.5%) because of a Multidisciplinary Cancer Committee indication. The unadjusted mean cost was significantly lower in Group II (patients with surgery based on Multidisciplinary Cancer Committee criteria) (Є2,581.80 ± Є1,002.50) than in Group I (patients with histopathological diagnosis) (Є4,244.60 ± Є2,008.80), P < 0.0001. Once adjusted for covariables, there was a mean difference of -Є1,437.20 in the costs of Group II, P < 0.0001. Unadjusted mean hospital stay was significantly longer in Group I (5.6 days) than in Group II (3.5 days). CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that indicating surgical resection of lung cancer based on Multidisciplinary Cancer Committee criteria, rather than performing CT-guided percutaneous lung biopsy, may result in a significant decrease in cost and length of hospital stay.

Starting a robotic thoracic surgery program: From wedge resection to sleeve lobectomy in six months. Initial conclusions.

INTRODUCTION: Robot-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) is a rapidly expanding technique. In our study, we aimed to analyze the results of the process to adopt robotic surgery in our Department of Thoracic Surgery. METHODS: This is an intention-to-treat analysis of a series of consecutive patients operated on using the RATS approach in our hospital from January 2021 to March 2022. Data were registered for patient characteristics, type of surgery, operative times, conversion rate, chest tube duration, length of hospital stay and complications. The IBM SPSS® statistical software was used for the statistical analysis. A cumulative sum analysis of the operating time was performed to define the learning curve. RESULTS: During the study period, 51 patients underwent robotic surgery, including pulmonary and non-pulmonary interventions. In addition, 15 patients (29.4%) underwent non-pulmonary interventions: one pleural (2%), 2 diaphragmatic (3.9%), and 12 mediastinal (23.5%). Among the mediastinal surgeries, one conversion was necessary (8.3%) for a complex vascular malformation, and 11 were completed by RATS, including 7 (58.3%) thymomas, 3 (25%) pleuro-pericardial cysts, and one (8.3%) neurogenic tumor. Mean operative time was 141 min (104-178), mean chest tube duration was 0.9 days (0-2), and mean length of stay was 1.45 days (1-2). Thirty-six patients underwent lung surgery (70.6%). The complete RATS resections (34; 94.4%) included: 3 wedge resections (11.1%), 2 segmentectomies (3.7%), 28 lobectomies (81.5%), and one sleeve lobectomy (3.7%). Mean surgery time was 194.56 min (141-247), chest tube duration was 3.92 days (1-8), and length of stay was 4.6 days (1-8). Complications occurred in 4 patients (11.1%). No 90-day mortalities were registered. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of RATS was achieved with good clinical results and operative times for all indications. A rapid learning curve was accomplished in short time. Previous VATS experience, patient selection, team training and program continuity are fundamental to successfully develop a RATS program.

Estudio histológico mediante biopsia pulmonar post mortem en pacientes con neumonía por COVID-19 / Histology Study of Postmortem Lung Biopsies in Patients with Covid-19 Pneumonia

No disponible

[Translated article] Histology Study of Postmortem Lung Biopsies in Patients With Covid-19 Pneumonia / Estudio histológico mediante biopsia pulmonar post mortem en pacientes con neumonía por COVID-19

No disponible

Tunnel technique for robotic-assisted left upper lobectomy.

Robotic-assisted thoracoscopy is a procedure that allows certain improvements over the traditionally used thoracoscopic procedures but still has disadvantages. Its association with dissection techniques such as the tunnel technique allows an approach to lungs with incomplete or fused fissures. We present the case of a 65-year-old female smoker with a 33-mm mass with a 13.7 SUVmax on positron emission tomography-computed tomography scans accompanied by biopsies that confirmed the diagnosis of small-cell lung cancer. After confirming that it was stage N0 and M0, surgical treatment was chosen. We performed a left upper lobectomy and thoracoscopic lymphadenectomy with robotic assistance; due to the presence of incomplete fissures, we used the fissure tunneling technique. This procedure ensured a safe dissection technique with the correct identification of the vascular and bronchial structures and reduced the risk of air leakage.

Is invasive mediastinal staging necessary in intermediate risk patients with negative PET/CT?

BACKGROUND: Tumor involvement of mediastinal lymph nodes is of high importance in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Invasive mediastinal staging is recommended in selected patients without evidence of mediastinal involvement on staging by imaging. In the present study we aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of invasive mediastinal staging in reducing pN2, its impact on survival and the risk factors for occult pN2. METHODS: Patients with NSCLC tumors larger than 3 cm, central tumors or cN1 cases treated in our institution between 2013 and 2018 were prospectively included in the study. Incidence of pN2 and overall survival was compared among invasively staged (IS) and non-invasively staged groups (NIS). Multivariate analysis was performed to identify risk factors of pN2. RESULTS: A total of 201 patients were included in the study, 79 (39.3%) of whom were not invasively staged (NIS group) and 122 (60.7%) were invasively staged (IS group). Incidence of cN1 and mean PET/CT uptake was different among both groups. Prevalence of pN2 was similar in both groups (7.6% in NIS vs. 12.6% in IS; P>0.05). Median survival in IS-pN2 patients was 11 months longer than in NIS-pN2 group (33.6 vs. 22.5 months; P=0.245). cN1 emerged as the only a risk factor for pN2. CONCLUSIONS: Invasive staging does not reduce the incidence of pN2. However, this finding could be biased because in our series cN1 patients were more often staged and cN1 has been detected as a risk factor for pN2. In addition patient better selection after invasive staging might have an impact on overall survival. To conclude, invasive mediastinal staging in intermediate risk patients for positive mediastinal nodes is justified.

Cost-effectiveness of a technology-supported multimodal prehabilitation program in moderate-to-high risk patients undergoing lung cancer resection: randomized controlled trial protocol.

BACKGROUND: Multimodal prehabilitation is a preoperative intervention with the objective to enhance cancer patients' functional status which has been showed to reduce both postoperative morbidity and hospital length of stay in digestive oncologic surgery. However, in lung cancer surgery patients further studies with higher methodological quality are needed to clarify the benefits of prehabilitation. The main aim of the current protocol is to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of a multimodal prehabilitation program supported by information and communication technologies in moderate-to-high risk lung cancer patients undergoing thoracic surgery. METHODS: A Quadruple Aim approach will be adopted, assessing the prehabilitation program at the following levels: i) Patients' and professionals' experience outcomes (by means of standardized questionnaires, focus groups and structured interviews); ii) Population health-based outcomes (e.g. hospital length of stay, number and severity of postoperative complications, peak oxygen uptake and levels of systemic inflammation); and, iii) Healthcare costs. DISCUSSION: This study protocol should contribute not only to increase the scientific basis on prehabilitation but also to detect the main factors modulating service adoption. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04052100 (August 9, 2019).

Outcomes and cost of lung cancer patients treated surgically or medically in Catalunya: cost-benefit implications for lung cancer screening programs.

Lung cancer screening programs with computed tomography of the chest reduce mortality by more than 20%. Yet, they have not been implemented widely because of logistic and cost implications. Here, we sought to: (1) use real-life data to compare the outcomes and cost of lung cancer patients with treated medically or surgically in our region and (2) from this data, estimate the cost-benefit ratio of a lung cancer screening program (CRIBAR) soon to be deployed in our region (Catalunya, Spain). We accessed the Catalan Health Surveillance System (CHSS) and analysed data of all patients with a first diagnosis of lung cancer between 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2016. Analysis was carried forward until 30 months (t = 30) after lung cancer diagnosis. Main results showed that: (1) surgically treated lung cancer patients have better survival and return earlier to regular home activities, use less healthcare related resources and cost less tax-payer money and (2) depending on incidence of lung cancer identified and treated in the program (1-2%), the return on investment for CRIBAR is expected to break even at 3-6 years, respectively, after its launch. Surgical treatment of lung cancer is cheaper and offers better outcomes. CRIBAR is estimated to be cost-effective soon after launch.

Technical results, clinical efficacy and predictors of outcome of intercostal arteries embolization for hemothorax: a two-institutions' experience.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the clinical efficacy and identify the predictors of outcome of intercostal arterial embolization for hemothorax caused by intercostal artery (ICA) injuries. METHODS: A retrospective multi-institutional study was conducted. Outcomes were analyzed in 30 consecutive patients presenting with hemothorax caused by active ICA hemorrhage undergoing transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE). Clinical and procedural parameters were compared between outcomes groups. RESULTS: Overall technical success rate was 87% (n=26). Among the 4 failed cases, 2 underwent repeated TAE and 2 underwent additional surgery. Overall 30-day mortality rate was 23%. Low haemoglobin levels and haematocrit, hepatic comorbidities and more than one artery undergoing embolization increased technical failure rate significantly. Survival was poorer in patients with massive bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: ICA embolization was found to be a safe and effective method in treating hemothorax caused by active ICA haemorrhage. Careful pre-embolization evaluation may be required for patient with low haemoglobin levels and haematocrit, hepatic comorbidities and active haemorrhage from more than one artery.

Prehabilitation in thoracic surgery.

Surgical resection remains the best treatment option for patients with early stage of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, it may be responsible of postoperative complication and mortality, especially in patients with impaired pulmonary function. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs have been focused mainly in minimal invasive surgery approach during lung resection and respiratory rehabilitation after surgery. Preoperative exercise-based intervention (prehabilitation) has demonstrated reduction of morbi-mortality in other surgeries but in thoracic surgery continues to be under discussion. Cardio-pulmonary exercise test (CPET) is the gold standard technique to predict postoperative morbi-mortality. The implementation of a preoperative respiratory rehabilitation could optimize patient's physical capacity before surgery and improve outcomes and enhance recovery. The aim of this systematic review of the literature is to identify the effectiveness and safety of prehabilitation programs in thoracic surgery, the type of exercise and its duration, and the group of patients with best benefit. Prehabilitation is a safe intervention without side effects in patients. High-intensity interval training (HIT) with duration of 2 to 6 weeks seems to be the best exercise programme in a prehabilitation intervention but it exists heterogeneity in terms of intensity and duration. Prehabilitation increase exercise capacity and significantly enhances pulmonary function. But the reduction of postoperative complication and mortality has not been clearly demonstrated. Different criteria selection, type of intervention and small sample size, in addition to no randomization, could justify disparate results. It seems that not all patients can benefit from prehabilitation and it could be indicated only in patients with impaired lung function. Further randomized clinical trials with enough patients, correct duration of HIT (2 to 6 weeks) and focused in COPD patients are needed to clarify the suitability of prehabilitation. Meanwhile, safety of prehabilitation and good results of some studies support this intervention in high-risk patients.

N2 disease in non-small-cell lung cancer: straight to surgery?

The correct treatment for patients with non-small-cell lung cancer and ipsilateral mediastinal involvement (N2) remains a challenge. The heterogeneity of this group of patients has been shown, as well as many different prognostic factors, that will determine a specific management to each of them. Although the standard treatment is based on a multimodality therapy consisting of chemotherapy, radiotherapy and surgery, surgery is not always indicated. The selection of patients who are going to be operated, reminds being a key point of the treatment of this disease. Recent reports on operable N2 disease have been reviewed by our group in order to discuss surgery indications and when to bring it about, with the possibility to go straight to surgery.

Is it appropriate to perform video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for advanced lung cancer?

Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) has showed benefits in terms of pain, hospital stay and accomplishment of adjuvancy therapy versus open surgery in early stage of non-small-cell lung cancer. Over the last years, the indication of VATS technique has been expanded to advanced lung cancer. In this article, we discuss the definition of VATS and advanced lung cancer, and the safety and feasibility of VATS technique for the resection of advanced tumors.