Factors affecting accuracy of clinical staging in resectable non-small cell lung cancer in a real-world study.

BACKGROUND: The clinical staging of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is well known to be related to their prognosis. However, there is usually a discrepancy between clinical staging and pathological staging. There are few analyses of clinical staging accuracy in patients with NSCLC. We compared the concordance rate between clinical and pathological staging of NSCLC and evaluated factors affecting the accuracy in real-world data. METHODS: Altogether, 811 patients with primary NSCLC who had undergone curative lung resection surgery in Severance Hospital from January 2019 to December 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. We used the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM staging. RESULTS: Among 811 patients, endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) and positron emission tomography (PET-CT) were performed in 31.6% and 96.7%, respectively. The concordance rates between clinical and pathological TNM staging, T factor, and N factor, were 68.7%, 77.7%, and 85.8%, respectively. With multivariable logistic regression analysis, current smokers (OR 0.49; 95% CI: 0.32-0.76, p = 0.001) and a higher clinical stage (p < 0.001) contributed to the clinical staging inaccuracy. Additionally, the presence of a bronchoscopy specialist was significantly associated with clinical staging accuracy (OR 1.53; 95% CI: 1.10-2.13, p = 0.011). CONCLUSION: Clinical staging accuracy in NSCLC improved compared to before the widespread use of PET-CT and EBUS in clinical staging work-up. Smoking history and absence of expert bronchoscopy specialists showed a meaningful correlation with the inaccuracy of clinical staging. Thus, training more bronchoscopy experts would improve the staging accuracy of NSCLC, which could positively affect the prognosis of NSCLC.

Usefulness of bronchial washing fluid for detection of EGFR mutations in non-small cell lung cancer.

INTRODUCTION: The implementation of bronchial washing fluid (BWF) as a diagnostic specimen may complement the low diagnostic yields of plasma in detecting EGFR mutation (mEGFR) in non-small cell lung cancer. However, the diagnostic value of BWF in detecting mEGFR has yet to be clarified. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From March 2021 to August 2022, patients with histologically confirmed NSCLC with matched tumor tissue, BWF, and/or plasma samples were enrolled. Patients were classified into either initial diagnosis or rebiopsy groups. Diagnostic yields of mEGFR in BWF and plasma were evaluated using droplet digital polymerase chain reaction and compared to mEGFR in tumor tissue as standard. RESULTS: The study included 123 patients (74.1 %) in the initial diagnosis and 43 patients (25.9 %) in the rebiopsy group. BWF showed higher sensitivity, specificity, and concordance rates than plasma in both the initial diagnosis (57.4 %, 96.4 %, and 74.0 % vs. 16.4 %, 96.2 %, and 53.1 %) and the rebiopsy group (87.9 %, 60.0 %, and 81.4 % vs. 25.0 %, 75.0 %, and 41.7 %). In the initial diagnosis group, mEGFR was detected in the BWF of 13 out of 16 patients, even in the absence of tumor cells in the tissue biopsy. In these cases, EGFR test results obtained from BWF showed concordance with EGFR test results from the tumor tissue obtained through repeated biopsy or surgery later. In the rebiopsy group, T790M was detected in 16 patients (37.2 %) by tissue biopsy. The combined use of tissue biopsy and BWF increased detection, confirming T790M in 22 patients (51.2 %). DISCUSSION: The detection of mEGFR using BWF shows higher diagnostic yields than plasma for both initial diagnosis and rebiopsy. T790M was detected earlier in BWF than in tissue rebiopsy in some cases, providing patients with an early opportunity to access third-generation EGFR-TKIs. The complementary use of BWF with tumor tissue may improve precision in EGFR-mutated NSCLC treatment strategies.