Preemptive Second Kidney Transplant Outcomes by Induction Type in the United States.

BACKGROUND: The role of induction in preemptive second kidney recipients is unclear. We examined the association between induction therapy and the long-term graft and recipient survival in the settings of tacrolimus and mycophenolate maintenance. METHODS: We identified all preemptive second kidney transplant recipients between 2000 and 2020 in the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. We excluded those with missing or mixed induction regimens and positive crossmatch. We grouped recipients by induction type into 3 groups: anti-thymocyte globulin (n = 1442), alemtuzumab (n = 362), and interleukin-2 receptor antagonist (IL-2RA; n = 481). We generated Kaplan-Meier curves of the recipient and death-censored graft survival (DCGS) with follow-up censored at 10 years. We used multivariable Cox proportional hazards models to examine the association between induction and the above outcomes. We adjusted the models for recipient and donor variables. RESULTS: Rates of delayed graft function, rejection, hospitalization, and post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder at one year were not statistically different. Recipient survival did not vary by induction type in the Kaplan-Meier analysis (log-rank P = .189) or in the multivariable model. However, DCGS was the lowest in the Alemtuzumab group (log-rank P = .01). In the multivariable models, alemtuzumab was associated with a 57% increased risk of graft loss (1.57, 95% confidence interval (1.08, 2.30), P = .019) compared to anti-thymocyte. Live-donor kidneys were associated with significantly better recipient survival and DCGS. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to anti-thymocyte induction, alemtuzumab, but not IL-2RA, was associated with inferior graft survival in preemptive second transplant recipients discharged on tacrolimus and mycophenolate.

Protocol-based nurse coordinator management of ambulatory tacrolimus dosing in de novo renal transplant recipients-A single-center experience with a large African American population.

INTRODUCTION: Transplant nurse (RN) coordinators review tacrolimus levels frequently and would be capable of making dose adjustments autonomously if not limited by their license. Collaborative practice agreements could be an answer; thus, the aim of this evaluation was to determine if an RN-driven protocol could be used safely and effectively to manage tacrolimus in ambulatory kidney transplant (KTX) recipients. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of all solitary adult KTX recipients between August 1, 2016, and July 29, 2017. The primary objective was to evaluate protocol adherence and frequency of use, and secondary objectives were to evaluate the utility of the protocol both overall and based on ethnicity. RESULTS: A total of 173 patients were included in the evaluation (59% African American [AA], 41% non-African American [non-AA). RN coordinators followed the protocol for 75% of tacrolimus adjustments; however, they only responded to 27% of the overall levels. There was no difference in 180-day tacrolimus-associated readmission (15% AA vs 5% non-AA, P = .06), biopsy-proven acute rejection (4% AA vs 7% non-AA, P = .363), or hyperkalemia (34% AA vs 32% non-AA, P = .87) between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Transplant nurse coordinators are capable of accurately following a protocol for tacrolimus dosage adjustment in a large, racially diverse kidney transplant center.