Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Bone Marrow Transplant ; 30(10): 681-6, 2002 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12420207

ABSTRACT

Fifty-seven patients receiving unrelated donor (UD) BMT were matched for disease and stage with 57 recipients of genotypically matched related donor (MRD) BMT. All UD recipients were matched serologically for A and B and by high resolution for DR and DQ antigens. All patients received CsA and 'short course' methotrexate with folinic acid. Unrelated donor BMT patients also received thymoglobulin 4.5 mg/kg (6 mg/kg if <30 kg) in divided doses over 3 days pretransplant. For UD and RD BMT, respectively, incidence of acute GVHD grade II-IV was 19 +/- 6% vs 36 +/- 8%, grade III-IV 10 +/- 6% vs 18 +/- 7%, chronic GVHD 44 +/- 8% vs 51 +/- 8%, non-relapse mortality 15 +/- 5% vs 8 +/- 4% at 100 days, 28 +/- 8% vs 36 +/- 7% at 3 years. At 3 years, relapse was 45 +/- 7% vs 42 +/- 7%, and disease-free survival 39 +/- 7% vs 37 +/- 7%. None of these differences are significant. Three-year overall survival was identical at 42 +/- 7%. For 29 patients with low/intermediate risk leukemia, disease-free survival was 68 +/- 10% after UD BMT vs 59 +/- 9% for RD BMT recipients (P = NS). Corresponding figures for high risk patients were 14 +/- 7% and 21 +/- 8%, respectively. We conclude that UD BMT recipients matched as above and given pretransplant ATG have similar outcomes to recipients of MRD BMT using conventional drug prophylaxis. Unrelated donor BMT should be considered in any circumstance where MRD BMT is routine.


Subject(s)
Antilymphocyte Serum/administration & dosage , Bone Marrow Transplantation/methods , Bone Marrow Transplantation/immunology , Bone Marrow Transplantation/mortality , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Genotype , Graft vs Host Disease/prevention & control , Histocompatibility Testing/methods , Humans , Male , Matched-Pair Analysis , Prognosis , Recurrence , Survival Rate , Tissue Donors , Transplantation, Homologous , Transplantation, Isogeneic , Treatment Outcome
2.
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant ; 8(9): 468-76, 2002.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12374451

ABSTRACT

The availability of an i.v. form of busulfan (Bu) has prompted investigation of administration schedules other than the 4-times-daily dosage commonly used with oral Bu. We have studied an allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) preparative regimen comprising fludarabine (FLU) 50 mg/m2 on days -6 to -2 plus i.v. Bu 3.2 mg/kg daily in a 3-hour infusion on days -5 to -2. The regimen was given to 70 patients aged 15 to 64 years (median, 41 years) with hematologic malignancy. Thirty-six patients (51%) had high-risk malignancy, 28 (40%) had unrelated or genotypically mismatched related donors (alternate donors [AD]) and 29 (41%) received bone marrow rather than blood as stem cell source. Acute GVHD prevention comprised antithymocyte globulin 4.5 mg/kg over 3 days pretransplantation, cyclosporin A, and short-course methotrexate with folinic acid. Hepatic toxicity was transient and there was no clinically diagnosed veno-occlusive disease. Grade II stomatitis occurred in 49 patients (70%) and hemorrhagic cystitis in 9 patients (13%). One patient with subtherapeutic phenytoin levels had a convulsion 8 hours after the third i.v. Bu dose, but no other neurotoxicity was apparent. Incidence of acute GVHD grades II to IV was 8% and incidence of grade III-IV was 3%, with no deaths from this cause. Actuarial incidence of chronic GVHD at 2 years is 38%. There were 2 cases of graft failure in unrelated donor BMT recipients, 1 of which was reversed by asecond transplantation. With a median follow-up of 16 months (range, 6-27 months), transplantation-related mortality at 100 days and 2 years was 2% and 5% for matched related donor (MRD) SCT and 8% and 19% for AD SCT, respectively (P = not significant). Relapse rates were 21% for 34 patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in complete remission or chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (low-risk), 66% for 19 patients with high-risk AML, and 18% for 17 patients with other active malignancy. Projected disease-free and overall survival rates at 2 years were 74% and 88% for low-risk disease, 26% and 37% for advanced AML, and 65% and 71% for other high-risk disease, respectively. Pharmacokinetic studies were done using 11 samples with the first and fourth doses of Bu. Kinetics were linear, and for the first and fourth doses, the half-lives were 2.60 +/- 0.44 and 2.57 +/- 0.36 hours, respectively. Clearances were 106.77 +/- 16.68 and 106.86 +/- 21.57 mL/min per m2, peak concentrations (Cmax) were 3.92 +/- 0.31 and 3.96 +/- 0.28 mcg/mL, and Bu areas under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) were 4866.51 +/- 771.42 and 4980 +/- 882.80 microM x min, respectively. Bu was completely cleared within 24 hours and the day 4 pharmacokinetic values were very similar to those on day 1 for every patient. The cumulative AUC was comparable to the target range established for p.o. Bu. This regimen incorporating once-daily i.v. Bu is convenient to give, is relatively well tolerated, gives predictable blood levels, and deserves further study in circumstances in which cytoreduction as well as immune suppression is needed.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage , Busulfan/administration & dosage , Busulfan/pharmacokinetics , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/methods , Transplantation Conditioning/methods , Vidarabine/analogs & derivatives , Vidarabine/administration & dosage , Adolescent , Adult , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/pharmacokinetics , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/toxicity , Busulfan/toxicity , Hematologic Neoplasms/complications , Hematologic Neoplasms/mortality , Hematologic Neoplasms/therapy , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/mortality , Humans , Injections, Intravenous , Middle Aged , Myeloablative Agonists/administration & dosage , Myeloablative Agonists/pharmacokinetics , Myeloablative Agonists/toxicity , Survival Analysis , Transplantation Conditioning/adverse effects , Transplantation Conditioning/mortality , Transplantation, Homologous , Treatment Outcome , Vidarabine/pharmacokinetics , Vidarabine/toxicity
3.
Bone Marrow Transplant ; 24(11): 1177-83, 1999 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10642805

ABSTRACT

We have compared the outcomes of 87 patients with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) and myelodysplasia (MDS) receiving matched sibling transplants with stem cells from peripheral blood (blood cell transplant, BCT) or bone marrow (BMT). In good risk patients (AML in CR1) granulocytes recovered to 0.5 x 10(9)/l a median of 14 days after BCT compared with 19 days after BMT (P < 0.0001). For patients with poor risk disease (AML beyond CR1 and MDS) corresponding figures were 16 vs 26 days (P < 0.0001). Platelet recovery to 20 x 10(9)/l was also faster after BCT (good risk 12 vs 20 days, P < 0.0001; poor risk 17 vs 22 days, P = 0.04). Red cell transfusions were unaffected by cell source, but BCT recipients required less platelet transfusions (good risk 1 vs 5, P = 0.002; poor risk 5 vs 11, P = 0.004). Blood cell transplants resulted in more chronic GVHD (86% vs 48%, P = 0.005) and a significantly higher proportion of recipients with KPS of 80% or less (48% vs 5%, P = 0.004). Disease-free survival at 4 years was 23% for both groups of poor risk patients but outcome in good risk patients was better after BCT (93% vs 62%, P = 0.047) related mainly to less relapse. While disease-free survival may be better after BCT than BMT for AML in CR1, quality of life may be relatively impaired.


Subject(s)
Bone Marrow Transplantation/methods , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/methods , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/therapy , Myelodysplastic Syndromes/therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Blood Component Transfusion , Blood Donors , Child , Child, Preschool , Graft Survival , Graft vs Host Disease , Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor/therapeutic use , Humans , Middle Aged , Quality of Life , Recurrence , Sibling Relations , Survival Rate , Transplantation, Homologous
4.
Bone Marrow Transplant ; 18(2): 315-8, 1996 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8864440

ABSTRACT

The role of high-dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in the treatment of patients with Ewing's sarcoma (EWS) remains uncertain. From November 1985 to September 1994, 13 patients aged 16-30 years (median 20.5) received high-dose melphalan (HDM) 140-200 mg/m2 +/- 500 cGy TBI followed by ASCT for relapsed/refractory (n = 4), metastatic (n = 2), or non-metastatic (n = 6) EWS, or for peripheral neuroectodermal tumor (PNET) (n = 1). This regimen was well tolerated with no transplant-related mortality and no toxicity requiring life sustaining measures. Three of the four patients treated for relapsed/refractory EWS had progression-free survivals (PFS) less than 5 months. The only long-term survivor of these four patients received HDM while in complete remission following pulmonary irradiation. Both patients with pulmonary metastases at presentation died just 5 and 6 months post-ASCT. All four patients with non-metastatic, bulky (> 8 cm) osseous EWS progressed at a median of 11 months (range 7-22 months) while the two patients with non-bulky EWS remain progression-free 25+ and 28+ months post-HDM/TBI + ASCT. The 19-year-old patient with a PNET of the thoracoabdominal wall relapsed 4 months post-ASCT. Overall, only three of these 13 patients remain progression-free at 25+, 28+, and 108+ months following HDM +/- TBI and ASCT. In conclusion, HDM +/- TBI did not obviously improve the outcome of these 13 patients relative to that expected following conventional dose therapy alone.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating/therapeutic use , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Melphalan/therapeutic use , Neuroectodermal Tumors/therapy , Sarcoma, Ewing/therapy , Whole-Body Irradiation , Adolescent , Adult , Combined Modality Therapy , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Humans , Melphalan/adverse effects , Neuroectodermal Tumors/mortality , Sarcoma, Ewing/mortality , Transplantation, Autologous
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...