Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Zookeys ; (494): 13-30, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25901112

ABSTRACT

According to the most recent taxonomic literature, three species of the genus Eresus are known in Central Europe, Eresuskollari, Eresussandaliatus and Eresusmoravicus. We recognized a fourth distinctive species from Hungary, which is described as Eresushermani sp. n. Eresushermani has an early spring copulation period, females have a light grey (grizzled) cephalothorax due to a heavy cover of lightly colored setae, and an epigyne with large flat areas posterior to the epigynal pit, while males are distinguished by a broad and blunt terminal tooth of the conductor. An updated and modified comparative table of Rezác et al. (2008) to include all four Central European Eresus species, and a simple key to the species group's species are given. Habitus, epigyne, vulva and conductor of Eresuskollari, Eresusmoravicus and Eresussandaliatus are also illustrated. An annotated list of papers illustrating Eresushermani due to misidentifications is presented.

2.
PLoS Genet ; 8(5): e1002720, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22654672

ABSTRACT

The homeotic genes in Drosophila melanogaster are aligned on the chromosome in the order of the body segments that they affect. The genes affecting the more posterior segments repress the more anterior genes. This posterior dominance rule must be qualified in the case of abdominal-A (abd-A) repression by Abdominal-B (Abd-B). Animals lacking Abd-B show ectopic expression of abd-A in the epidermis of the eighth abdominal segment, but not in the central nervous system. Repression in these neuronal cells is accomplished by a 92 kb noncoding RNA. This "iab-8 RNA" produces a micro RNA to repress abd-A, but also has a second, redundant repression mechanism that acts only "in cis." Transcriptional interference with the abd-A promoter is the most likely mechanism.


Subject(s)
Drosophila Proteins , MicroRNAs/genetics , Morphogenesis/genetics , Nuclear Proteins , RNA, Untranslated/genetics , Transcription Factors , Abdomen/growth & development , Animals , Base Sequence , Drosophila/genetics , Drosophila/growth & development , Drosophila Proteins/genetics , Drosophila Proteins/metabolism , Embryonic Development/genetics , Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental , Homeodomain Proteins/genetics , Homeodomain Proteins/metabolism , Infertility/genetics , MicroRNAs/metabolism , Molecular Sequence Data , Mutation , Neurons/cytology , Neurons/metabolism , Nuclear Proteins/genetics , Nuclear Proteins/metabolism , Promoter Regions, Genetic , Transcription Factors/genetics , Transcription Factors/metabolism
3.
Development ; 135(24): 3983-7, 2008 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18987027

ABSTRACT

Although the boundary elements of the Drosophila Bithorax complex (BX-C) have properties similar to chromatin insulators, genetic substitution experiments have demonstrated that these elements do more than simply insulate adjacent cis-regulatory domains. Many BX-C boundaries lie between enhancers and their target promoter, and must modulate their activity to allow distal enhancers to communicate with their target promoter. Given this complex function, it is surprising that the numerous BX-C boundaries share little sequence identity. To determine the extent of the similarity between these elements, we tested whether different BX-C boundary elements can functionally substitute for one another. Using gene conversion, we exchanged the Fab-7 and Fab-8 boundaries within the BX-C. Although the Fab-8 boundary can only partially substitute for the Fab-7 boundary, we find that the Fab-7 boundary can almost completely replace the Fab-8 boundary. Our results suggest that although boundary elements are not completely interchangeable, there is a commonality to the mechanism by which boundaries function. This commonality allows different DNA-binding proteins to create functional boundaries.


Subject(s)
Drosophila Proteins/genetics , Drosophila/growth & development , Drosophila/genetics , Genes, Homeobox , Genes, Insect , Homeodomain Proteins/genetics , Animals , Base Sequence , Body Patterning/genetics , DNA Primers/genetics , Enhancer Elements, Genetic , Female , Gene Conversion , Genetic Complementation Test , Male , Multigene Family , Promoter Regions, Genetic
4.
Mol Cell Biol ; 28(9): 2920-9, 2008 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18299390

ABSTRACT

SWI/SNF ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling complexes (remodelers) perform critical functions in eukaryotic gene expression control. BAP and PBAP are the fly representatives of the two evolutionarily conserved major subclasses of SWI/SNF remodelers. Both complexes share seven core subunits, including the Brahma ATPase, but differ in a few signature subunits; POLYBROMO and BAP170 specify PBAP, whereas OSA defines BAP. Here, we show that the transcriptional coactivator and PHD finger protein SAYP is a novel PBAP subunit. Biochemical analysis established that SAYP is tightly associated with PBAP but absent from BAP. SAYP, POLYBROMO, and BAP170 display an intimately overlapping distribution on larval salivary gland polytene chromosomes. Genome-wide expression analysis revealed that SAYP is critical for PBAP-dependent transcription. SAYP is required for normal development and interacts genetically with core- and PBAP-selective subunits. Genetic analysis suggested that, like BAP, PBAP also counteracts Polycomb silencing. SAYP appears to be a key architectural component required for the integrity and association of the PBAP-specific module. We conclude that SAYP is a signature subunit that plays a major role in the functional specificity of the PBAP holoenzyme.


Subject(s)
Chromatin Assembly and Disassembly/physiology , Drosophila Proteins/physiology , Drosophila melanogaster/metabolism , Transcription Factors/physiology , Animals , Cells, Cultured , Embryo, Nonmammalian , Larva , Protein Subunits/physiology , Salivary Glands/metabolism , Transcription, Genetic
5.
Development ; 133(15): 2983-93, 2006 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16818450

ABSTRACT

The three homeotic genes of the bithorax complex (BX-C), Ubx, abd-A and Abd-B control the identity of the posterior thorax and all abdominal segments. Large segment-specific cis-regulatory regions control the expression of Ubx, abd-A or Abd-B in each of the segments. These segment-specific cis-regulatory regions span the whole 300 kb of the BX-C and are arranged on the chromosome in the same order as the segments they specify. Experiments with lacZ reporter constructs revealed the existence of several types of regulatory elements in each of the cis-regulatory regions. These include initiation elements, maintenance elements, cell type- or tissue-specific enhancers, chromatin insulators and the promoter targeting sequence. In this paper, we extend the analysis of regulatory elements within the BX-C by describing a series of internal deficiencies that affect the Abd-B regulatory region. Many of the elements uncovered by these deficiencies are further verified in transgenic reporter assays. Our results highlight four key features of the iab-5, iab-6 and iab-7 cis-regulatory region of Abd-B. First, the whole Abd-B region is modular by nature and can be divided into discrete functional domains. Second, each domain seems to control specifically the level of Abd-B expression in only one parasegment. Third, each domain is itself modular and made up of a similar set of definable regulatory elements. And finally, the activity of each domain is absolutely dependent on the presence of an initiator element.


Subject(s)
Drosophila Proteins/genetics , Drosophila/embryology , Drosophila/genetics , Homeodomain Proteins/genetics , Animals , Body Patterning , Embryo, Nonmammalian/physiology , Gene Deletion , Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental , Mutagenesis
6.
Mol Cell Biol ; 26(4): 1434-44, 2006 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16449654

ABSTRACT

Specific targeting of the protein complexes formed by the Polycomb group of proteins is critically required to maintain the inactive state of a group of developmentally regulated genes. Although the role of DNA binding proteins in this process has been well established, it is still not understood how these proteins target the Polycomb complexes specifically to their response elements. Here we show that the grainyhead gene, which encodes a DNA binding protein, interacts with one such Polycomb response element of the bithorax complex. Grainyhead binds to this element in vitro. Moreover, grainyhead interacts genetically with pleiohomeotic in a transgene-based, pairing-dependent silencing assay. Grainyhead also interacts with Pleiohomeotic in vitro, which facilitates the binding of both proteins to their respective target DNAs. Such interactions between two DNA binding proteins could provide the basis for the cooperative assembly of a nucleoprotein complex formed in vitro. Based on these results and the available data, we propose that the role of DNA binding proteins in Polycomb group-dependent silencing could be described by a model very similar to that of an enhanceosome, wherein the unique arrangement of protein-protein interaction modules exposed by the cooperatively interacting DNA binding proteins provides targeting specificity.


Subject(s)
DNA-Binding Proteins/genetics , DNA-Binding Proteins/metabolism , Drosophila Proteins/genetics , Drosophila Proteins/metabolism , Drosophila/genetics , Drosophila/metabolism , Transcription Factors/genetics , Transcription Factors/metabolism , Animals , Animals, Genetically Modified , Base Sequence , Binding Sites/genetics , DNA/genetics , DNA/metabolism , Female , Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental , Gene Silencing , Genes, Insect , Male , Models, Biological , Molecular Sequence Data , Polycomb Repressive Complex 1 , Polycomb-Group Proteins , Protein Binding
7.
FEBS J ; 272(13): 3253-9, 2005 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15978032

ABSTRACT

Abdominal-B (Abd-B) is a complex homeotic gene with a difficult task: one transcript determines the identity of four different abdominal segments throughout development in Drosophila. Although an increasing amount of information is available about the structure and the functioning of the regulatory regions that determine the expression pattern of Abd-B, it is still not clear how these regulatory regions can contact the distantly located (several tens of kilobases away) promoter in the nucleus, what mechanism restricts promiscuous enhancers to this specific interaction, and how different regulatory regions replace one another at the same promoter in subsequent abdominal segments. Moreover, several of these regulatory regions have to act over chromatin domain boundaries and extensive inactive chromatin domains, similarly to the situation found in the chicken beta-globin cluster. In this minireview we survey mechanisms and factors that may be involved in mediating specific interactions between the Abd-B promoter and its regulatory regions.


Subject(s)
Drosophila Proteins/genetics , Drosophila melanogaster/genetics , Enhancer Elements, Genetic/genetics , Gene Expression Regulation , Homeodomain Proteins/genetics , Promoter Regions, Genetic , Abdomen/embryology , Abdomen/innervation , Animals , Drosophila Proteins/metabolism , Drosophila melanogaster/metabolism , Homeodomain Proteins/metabolism , Response Elements , Transcription, Genetic
8.
Genetics ; 169(1): 173-84, 2005 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15371351

ABSTRACT

We have identified a novel gene named grappa (gpp) that is the Drosophila ortholog of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae gene Dot1, a histone methyltransferase that modifies the lysine (K)79 residue of histone H3. gpp is an essential gene identified in a genetic screen for dominant suppressors of pairing-dependent silencing, a Polycomb-group (Pc-G)-mediated silencing mechanism necessary for the maintenance phase of Bithorax complex (BX-C) expression. Surprisingly, gpp mutants not only exhibit Pc-G phenotypes, but also display phenotypes characteristic of trithorax-group mutants. Mutations in gpp also disrupt telomeric silencing but do not affect centric heterochromatin. These apparent contradictory phenotypes may result from loss of gpp activity in mutants at sites of both active and inactive chromatin domains. Unlike the early histone H3 K4 and K9 methylation patterns, the appearance of methylated K79 during embryogenesis coincides with the maintenance phase of BX-C expression, suggesting that there is a unique role for this chromatin modification in development.


Subject(s)
Drosophila melanogaster/genetics , Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental , Gene Silencing , Histone-Lysine N-Methyltransferase/metabolism , Methylation , Telomere/metabolism , Animals , Drosophila Proteins/physiology , Drosophila melanogaster/growth & development , Drosophila melanogaster/metabolism , Embryonic Development , Female , Genes, Dominant , Heterochromatin/metabolism , Histone-Lysine N-Methyltransferase/genetics , Histones/metabolism , Homeodomain Proteins/physiology , Lysine/metabolism , Male , Mutation/genetics , Nuclear Proteins/chemistry , Phenotype , Polycomb Repressive Complex 1 , Repressor Proteins/physiology , Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins/chemistry
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...