Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
BMC Public Health ; 12: 650, 2012 Aug 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22889044

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Over the decades, global public health efforts have sought to reduce socio-economic health differences, including differences in mental health. Only a few studies have examined changes in socio-economic differences in psychological symptoms over time. The aim of this study was to assess trends in socio-economic differences in self-reported insomnia and stress over a 24-year time period in Finland. METHODS: The data source is a repeated cross-sectional survey "Health Behaviour and Health among the Finnish Adult Population" (AVTK), from the years 1979 to 2002, divided into five study periods. Indicators for socio-economic status included employment status from the survey, and educational level and household income from the Statistics Finland register data. We studied the age group of 25-64 years (N = 70115; average annual response rate 75%). Outcome measures were single questions of self-reported insomnia and stress. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of insomnia was 18-19% and that of stress 16-19%. Compared to the first study period, 1979-1982, the prevalence of stress increased until study period 1993-1997. The prevalence of insomnia increased during the last study period, 1998-2002. Respondents who were unemployed or had retired early reported more insomnia and stress over time among both men and women. Lower education was associated with more insomnia especially among men; and conversely, with less stress among both sexes. Compared to the highest household income level, those in the intermediate levels of income had less stress whereas those in the lowest income levels had more stress among both sexes. Income level differences in insomnia were less consistent. In general, socio-economic differences in self-reported insomnia and stress fluctuated some, but did not change substantially over the study period 1979-2002. CONCLUSIONS: Self-reported insomnia and stress were more common during later study periods. The socio-economic differences in insomnia and stress have remained fairly stable over a 24-year time period. However, some of the associations in socio-economic differences were curvilinear and converse. Future studies are needed to explore the complex socio-economic gradients, especially in stress.


Subject(s)
Health Status Disparities , Self Report , Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders/epidemiology , Stress, Psychological/epidemiology , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Finland/epidemiology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Socioeconomic Factors
2.
Eur J Public Health ; 16(5): 476-83, 2006 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16601112

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Married persons are healthier and live longer than single, divorced, and widowed persons. Time trends in self-rated health (SRH) by marital status and cohabitation have remained largely unstudied. We aim to assess the levels and trends of SRH by official marital status and cohabitation, and to study the causes of these differences. METHODS: Two nationally representative cross-sectional surveys were conducted 20 years apart in Finland. Data on self-reported marital status, SRH, education, smoking, and long-standing illness were collected from Finns aged 30-64 years in 1978-80 (Mini-Finland Health Survey, N = 6102, response rate 96%) and 2000-01 (Health 2000 Survey, N = 5871, response rate 92%). RESULTS: SRH has improved in the last 20 years, but differences between marital status groups have not reduced. In 2000-01, non-married persons reported worse SRH than married persons. Among men, single [cumulative odds ratio (COR) = 1.55; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.22-1.99] and divorced (COR = 1.55; 95% CI 1.17-2.05) persons showed the poorest SRH, while among women widows (1.53; 95% CI 1.04-2.26) were the most disadvantaged group. The SRH of cohabiting persons did not significantly differ from that of married persons. Differences in educational structure, smoking, and the prevalence of long-term illness explain part of the marital status differences in SRH among men, but less so among women. Among both single men and women as well as among widowed women, SRH had improved slightly less than in the other groups. CONCLUSION: The challenges on public health posed by growing numbers of currently not married people are likely to increase.


Subject(s)
Health Status , Marital Status/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Age Distribution , Cross-Sectional Studies , Data Collection , Female , Finland , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Odds Ratio , Residence Characteristics/statistics & numerical data
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...