ABSTRACT
The purposes of this study were threefold, 1) to develop a method for comparing various impression techniques and materials, 2) to compare the extension of impressions with ZOE-paste and silicone, and 3) to evaluate the precision for each method. A special device was constructed in order to secure an identical position of the impression trays. The results indicated that ZOE-paste impression in a border moulded tray produced more extended impressions lingually but buccally there were no difference between the chosen materials/method. No differences in precision of the two methods could be measured.
Subject(s)
Dental Impression Technique , Denture, Partial, Removable , Dental Impression Materials/chemistry , Dental Impression Technique/instrumentation , Female , Humans , Jaw, Edentulous, Partially , Male , Mandible , Middle Aged , Silicones/chemistry , Surface Properties , Zinc Oxide-Eugenol Cement/chemistryABSTRACT
The masticatory efficiency was studied among 19 complete denture wearers with their old and new dentures. The test chewing material was gelatin hardened by formalin. A standardized preparation of the test chewing material and the sieve-system is described. The patients were tested on seven different occasions from the period with the old dentures until about 1.5 years after the insertion of the new dentures. The test pieces were chewed for ten seconds--a practice test--20 seconds and until ready to be swallowed. The chewed material was strained in a sieve-system and masticatory efficiency indices were calculated. The results revealed no statistical significant differences in masticatory efficiency between any of the seven testing occasions with the method used. Thus no significant difference was noticed when patients changed from old to new dentures or during the first 18 months after insertion of new dentures.
