Incontinence after colonoscopy--an unrecognized and preventable problem. A cross-sectional study from the Gastronet quality assurance program.

BACKGROUND: Colonoscopy requires insufflation of gas for visualization of the bowel wall. Worldwide, this is usually done using air. The aim of the present study was to assess the risk of postcolonoscopy incontinence, and to investigate whether insufflation of CO2 instead of air may reduce this risk, since it is easily absorbed through the bowel mucosa. METHODS: This is a prospective multicenter study of colonoscopy patients undergoing bowel insufflation using air or CO2. A successive series of colonoscopies were reported to a national quality assurance program in Norway between January and December 2009 from 21 endoscopy centers with varying insufflation practices. The study comprised 7812 patients aged 18 years or older who were referred for outpatient colonoscopy. Of these, 5015 underwent colonoscopy performed using air and 2797 colonoscopy using CO2 insufflation. RESULTS: Patient-reported incontinence up to 24 h after colonoscopy was compared using binary logistic regression analysis for the type of gas used for insufflation. The air and CO2 patient groups were comparable with regard to age, sex, indication for colonoscopy, and sedation practice. Incontinence was reported by 336 out of 7812 patients (4.3%). Incontinence was significantly less frequent in the CO2 group than in the air group [2.1% versus 5.5%; adjusted odds ratio (OR) 0.38; 95%CI 0.28-0.50; P < 0.001]. Female patients had a higher risk of incontinence than men (adjusted OR 1.77; 95% CI 1.39-2.24; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: About every 20th patient undergoing colonoscopy using standard air insufflation experiences postexamination incontinence. This proportion can be reduced by 60% by converting from air insufflation to insufflation with the absorbable CO2.

Patient satisfaction with on-demand sedation for outpatient colonoscopy.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIM: To reduce the costs of colonoscopy the feasibility of unsedated procedures has been explored. The aims of our study were to assess patient satisfaction with on-demand sedation and identify factors related to painful colonoscopy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The Norwegian Gastronet quality assurance documentation tools consist of endoscopy reports (completed on site) and a patient satisfaction questionnaire (completed by the patient on the day after colonoscopy). Data were collected from January 1 2004 to December 31 2006. Colonoscopies reported to be moderately or severely painful were defined as "painful colonoscopy." RESULTS: Nine endoscopy centers representing 86 endoscopists reported 14 915 examinations and 12 354 patient reports were returned (83 % response rate). Patient satisfaction with service and information given was greater than 95 % for all centers. Mean rate of painful colonoscopy was 34 % and mean sedation rate 34 %. Odds ratio (OR) for painful colonoscopy was 2.2 ( P < 0.001) when sedation was given. The ORs for painful colonoscopy were similar for all but one center (no. 4) with OR 1.6 ( P = 0.04), while the OR for giving sedation was higher for all but one center (no. 1) compared with the reference center (ORs 2.2 to 7.5, all P-values < 0.001). CONCLUSION: A surprisingly high rate of painful colonoscopy was found. High sedation rates were not associated with low rates of painful colonoscopy. Recommending increased sedation rates as the only intervention to improve suboptimal performance might not lead to lower rates of painful colonoscopy.

Communication of information to patients with inflammatory bowel disease: A European Collaborative Study in a multinational prospective inception cohort.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Communication to patients of information about their disease has become increasingly important in modern medicine, and particularly with chronic nonfatal disorders like inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), but the subject is not adequately researched or understood. METHODS: We studied the media and preferences for communication of information in a multi-national community-based inception cohort of European and Israeli patients with IBD and 10 years follow-up, using structured questionnaires categorizing demographics, disease status, current and preferred sources of information, use of electronic media, role of patients' associations, and satisfaction level. RESULTS: The 917 patients completing the questionnaire were derived from northern (60%) and southern (40%) countries. The mean age was 48.3 years (62% under 50 years); 51% were males; 67% had ulcerative colitis, 33% Crohn's disease. Sixty-six percent of patients designated the specialist as their primary source of information, 77% indicated satisfaction with their current information, and 65% reported not receiving information about medical treatment in the past year. Patient concerns were about new research into their illness (64%), medical treatments (58%), risks and complications (51%) and genetics (42%). Preferred sources of information were paper bulletin (76%), electronic media (30%) and international organization (79%). Diagnosis (ulcerative colitis or Crohn's disease), gender, education level and country impacted significantly on patients' choices. CONCLUSIONS: In providing health care information to patients with IBD their individual attitudes and preferences must be considered. There should be greater roles for IBD patients' associations and international IBD-research organizations, and an increasing use of electronic media.

Ulcerative colitis: no rise in mortality in a European-wide population based cohort 10 years after diagnosis.

BACKGROUND: Population based studies have revealed varying mortality for patients with ulcerative colitis but most have described patients from limited geographical areas who were diagnosed before 1990. AIMS: To assess overall mortality in a European cohort of patients with ulcerative colitis, 10 years after diagnosis, and to investigate national ulcerative colitis related mortality across Europe. METHODS: Mortality 10 years after diagnosis was recorded in a prospective European-wide population based cohort of patients with ulcerative colitis diagnosed in 1991-1993 from nine centres in seven European countries. Expected mortality was calculated from the sex, age and country specific mortality in the WHO Mortality Database for 1995-1998. Standardised mortality ratios (SMR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. RESULTS: At follow-up, 661 of 775 patients were alive with a median follow-up duration of 123 months (107-144). A total of 73 deaths (median follow-up time 61 months (1-133)) occurred compared with an expected 67. The overall mortality risk was no higher: SMR 1.09 (95% CI 0.86 to 1.37). Mortality by sex was SMR 0.92 (95% CI 0.65 to 1.26) for males and SMR 1.39 (95% CI 0.97 to 1.93) for females. There was a slightly higher risk in older age groups. For disease specific mortality, a higher SMR was found only for pulmonary disease. Mortality by European region was SMR 1.19 (95% CI 0.91 to 1.53) for the north and SMR 0.82 (95% CI 0.45-1.37) for the south. CONCLUSIONS: Higher mortality was not found in patients with ulcerative colitis 10 years after disease onset. However, a significant rise in SMR for pulmonary disease, and a trend towards an age related rise in SMR, was observed.

Phenotype at diagnosis predicts recurrence rates in Crohn's disease.

BACKGROUND: In Crohn's disease (CD), studies associating phenotype at diagnosis and subsequent disease activity are important for patient counselling and health care planning. AIMS: To calculate disease recurrence rates and to correlate these with phenotypic traits at diagnosis. METHODS: A prospectively assembled uniformly diagnosed European population based inception cohort of CD patients was classified according to the Vienna classification for disease phenotype at diagnosis. Surgical and non-surgical recurrence rates throughout a 10 year follow up period were calculated. Multivariate analysis was performed to classify risk factors present at diagnosis for recurrent disease. RESULTS: A total of 358 were classified for phenotype at diagnosis, of whom 262 (73.2%) had a first recurrence and 113 patients (31.6%) a first surgical recurrence during the first 10 years after diagnosis. Patients with upper gastrointestinal disease at diagnosis had an excess risk of recurrence (hazard ratio 1.54 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.13-2.10)) whereas age >/=40 years at diagnosis was protective (hazard ratio 0.82 (95% CI 0.70-0.97)). Colonic disease was a protective characteristic for resective surgery (hazard ratio 0.38 (95% CI 0.21-0.69)). More frequent resective surgical recurrences were reported from Copenhagen (hazard ratio 3.23 (95% CI 1.32-7.89)). CONCLUSIONS: A mild course of disease in terms of disease recurrence was observed in this European cohort. Phenotype at diagnosis had predictive value for disease recurrence with upper gastrointestinal disease being the most important positive predictor. A phenotypic North-South gradient in CD may be present, illustrated by higher surgery risks in some of the Northern European centres.

Comparison of three triple regimens with omeprazole or ranitidine bismuth citrate for Helicobacter pylori eradication.

BACKGROUND: Regimens with ranitidine bismuth citrate (RBC) or omeprazole (O) are effective in eradicating Helicobacter pylori. This randomized, open, multicentre trial compares three different regimens with these drugs. METHODS: Consecutive H. pylori +ve outpatients were included. The alternative regimens were: 1) O 20 mg, clarithromycin (C) 250 mg and metronidazole (M) 500 mg (O.C.M), 2) RBC 400 mg, C 250 mg and M 500 mg (RBC.C.M), 3) RBC 400 mg, tetracycline (T) 1000 mg and M 500 mg [RBC.T.M]. All drugs were given twice daily for 7 days. H. pylori infection was assessed with H. pylori urea breath tests. RESULTS: 426 H. pylori +ve patients were included (mean age 58 years [range 18-88], male/female: 244/182). The eradication rates (intention to treat) in the O.C.M, RBC.C.M and RBC.T.M groups were 117/137 (85%), 141/146 (97%) and 117/143 (82%), respectively (P < 0.001, overall assessment). There were no significant differences in side effects between the alternatives. CONCLUSION: In this trial, RBC.C.M was the most effective one, it was well tolerated and compliance was satisfactory. RBC.T.M is an alternative to regimens with clarithromycin.

High Helicobacter pylori eradication rate with a 1-week regimen containing ranitidine bismuth citrate.

BACKGROUND: High Helicobacter pylori eradication rates have consistently been reported with 2-week dual therapy regimens of ranitidine bismuth citrate plus clarithromycin. Ranitidine bismuth citrate with two antibiotics may provide an alternative 1-week eradication regimen. METHODS: This double-blind, randomized, parallel group, international, multicentre study compared ranitidine bismuth citrate 400 mg b.d. and clarithromycin 500 mg b.d. for 2 weeks (RC) with ranitidine bismuth citrate 400 mg b.d., clarithromycin 500 mg b.d. and metronidazole 400 mg b.d. for 1 week (RCM) for eradication of H. pylori in 350 patients with dyspepsia. RESULTS: Treatment with RC and RCM eradicated H. pylori (established by the combination of two negative results from two discrete 13C-UBTs at nominal weeks 4 and 12) from 89% (95% CI: 84-94) and 92% (95% CI: 88-97) of the observed population, and from 78% (95% CI: 72-84) and 80% (95% CI: 75-86) of the intention-to-treat population. When established only by one negative 13C-UBT result at least 28 days after the end of treatment, the respective intention-to-treat rates were 85% (95% CI: 79-90) and 88% (95% CI: 83-93). Both regimens were well-tolerated, only 6% of patients given RC and 4% given RCM discontinued treatment. Median plasma bismuth concentrations at the end of the second week of study were low, at 3.5 and 0.4 ng/ mL, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Ranitidine bismuth citrate triple therapy for 1 week (RCM) and dual therapy for 2 weeks (RC) were equally effective for the eradication of H. pylori infection.

Highly effective twice-daily triple therapies for Helicobacter pylori infection and peptic ulcer disease: does in vitro metronidazole resistance have any clinical relevance?

OBJECTIVES: To compare cure rates of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection, ulcer healing, and side effects of three simplified regimens of triple therapy in patients with peptic ulcer disease. METHODS: Two hundred thirty-one patients were prospectively randomized to receive either regimen OAM (omeprazole 20 mg b.i.d., amoxicillin 750 mg b.i.d., and metronidazole 400 g b.i.d.), OCM (omeprazole 20 mg b.i.d., clarithromycin 250 mg b.i.d., and metronidazole 400 mg b.i.d.), or BCM (bismuth subcitrate 240 mg b.i.d., clarithromycin 250 mg b.i.d., and metronidazole 400 mg b.i.d.), all for 10 days. Side effects were reported immediately afterward in a self-administered questionnaire. Upper endoscopy was carried out before treatment and 2 months after treatment. Three antral and three corpus biopsy specimens were analyzed microbiologically and with rapid urease test to determine the presence of H. pylori. Altogether 143 patients (62%) had an active ulcer at start of treatment. Metronidazole resistant (M-R) H. pylori strains were found in 30% of patients, while none had clarithromycin resistant (C-R) strains. RESULTS: According to intention-to-treat analysis, H. pylori cure rates were 91, 95, and 95% with OAM, OCM, and BCM, respectively (p = 0.63). In patients with metronidazole-sensitive (M-S) strains versus M-R strains, the cure rates were 96 versus 77% with OAM (p = 0.025), 94 versus 94% with OCM, and 94 versus 96% with BCM. Ulcer healing rates were 95, 94, and 92%, respectively (p = 0.91). There were no significant differences in side effects between the regimens, and only five patients (2%) had to stop the treatment prematurely. CONCLUSIONS: All treatment regimens were highly effective for cure of H. pylori infection and for ulcer healing. Metronidazole resistance reduced the efficacy of OAM, but was of no importance for the efficacy of OCM or BCM. Side effects were of minor importance.