Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Endoscopy ; 55(5): 476-481, 2023 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36261076

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND : Motorized spiral enteroscopy (MSE) was recently introduced into clinical practice. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of MSE for biliopancreatic interventions in patients with surgically altered anatomy. METHODS : Patients with surgically altered anatomy receiving MSE-assisted ERCP at a single, endoscopy referral center were retrospectively enrolled between January 2016 and June 2021. RESULTS : 36 patients (14 female, 22 male), median age 67 years (range 43-88), with biliary (n = 35) and pancreatic (n = 1) indications for MSE-ERCP, were enrolled. The majority (75.0 %) had relevant comorbidities (American Society of Anesthesiologists class III). Surgical reconstruction included Roux-en-Y (n = 30) and Billroth II (n = 6). Technical success rates for enteroscopy, cannulation, and interventions were 86.1 %, 83.9 %, and 100 %, respectively. The overall MSE-ERCP success rate was 72.2 %. One major complication occurred (2.8 %; delayed post-sphincterotomy bleeding). CONCLUSIONS : This is the first study to demonstrate the feasibility and safety of MSE-assisted ERCP in postsurgical patients with altered anatomy at an expert center. These data justify further evaluation of this new technique, preferably in a prospective multicenter trial.


Subject(s)
Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde , Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal , Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde/methods , Retrospective Studies , Prospective Studies , Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal/methods , Catheterization , Anastomosis, Roux-en-Y/adverse effects
3.
World J Gastroenterol ; 25(27): 3538-3545, 2019 Jul 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31367155

ABSTRACT

The advent of video capsule endoscopy into clinical routine more than 15 years ago led to a substantial change in the diagnostic approach to patients with suspected small bowel diseases, often indicating a deep enteroscopy procedure for diagnostical confirmation or endoscopic treatment. Device assisted enteroscopy was developed in 2001 and for the first time established a practicable, safe and effective method for evaluation of the small bowel. Currently with double-balloon enteroscopy, single-balloon enteroscopy and spiral enteroscopy three different platforms are available in clinical routine. Summarizing, double-balloon enteroscopy seems to offer the deepest insertion depth to the small bowel going hand in hand with the disadvantage of a longer procedural duration. Manual spiral enteroscopy seems to be a faster procedure but without reaching the depth of the DBE in currently available data. Finally, single-balloon enteroscopy seems to be the least complicated procedure to perform. Despite substantial improvements in the field of direct enteroscopy, even nowadays deep endoscopic access to the small bowel with all available methods is still a complex procedure, cumbersome and time-consuming and requires high endoscopic skills. This review will give an overview of the currently available techniques and will further discuss the role of the upcoming new technology of the motorized spiral enteroscopy (PowerSpiral).


Subject(s)
Balloon Enteroscopy/instrumentation , Capsule Endoscopy/instrumentation , Endoscopes, Gastrointestinal , Intestinal Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Balloon Enteroscopy/adverse effects , Balloon Enteroscopy/methods , Biomedical Technology/trends , Capsule Endoscopy/adverse effects , Capsule Endoscopy/methods , Humans , Intestinal Diseases/surgery , Intestine, Small/diagnostic imaging , Intestine, Small/surgery , Inventions/trends
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...