Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Scand J Rheumatol ; 30(2): 82-6, 2001.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11324794

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To increase the knowledge of the long-term effects of artificial hip and knee joint implants. METHODS: The study groups consisted of 24,636 patients with osteoarthritis who underwent hip implant surgery and 5,221 who received knee implants during 1977-89. The post-implant rate of hospitalization for connective tissue disease (CTD) was compared with the rate in the general population of Denmark and with that among osteoarthritis patients without implant surgery. RESULTS: The rates of hospitalization for CTD were higher than the background level among both hip and knee implant patients with osteoarthritis, whereas the comparison with non-implanted osteoarthritis patients revealed that the hospitalization rate for CTD was reduced after hip implant surgery, but increased after knee implant surgery. CONCLUSION: Since the materials used in hip and knee implants in Denmark are not substantially different, these results are unlikely to reflect an implant effect but rather the selection criteria of referral for implant surgery.


Subject(s)
Connective Tissue Diseases/etiology , Hip Prosthesis , Knee Prosthesis , Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cohort Studies , Connective Tissue Diseases/epidemiology , Denmark/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Osteoarthritis, Hip/surgery , Osteoarthritis, Knee/surgery , Registries
2.
Int J Cancer ; 88(2): 301-6, 2000 Oct 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11004684

ABSTRACT

Most studies on cancer incidence after breast implantation have focused on breast cancer, while the risk of cancers at other sites has been less well investigated. We examined cancer incidence among 1,653 women who underwent cosmetic breast implant surgery at private clinics of plastic surgery in Denmark and 1,736 women attending the same clinics for other reasons during the period 1973-1995. Furthermore, we updated previously reported results among 1,114 women who received implants for cosmetic indications at public hospitals. All women were followed for cancer through the Danish Cancer Registry. In comparison with the general female population, the overall standardized incidence ratio (SIR) for cancer among women who received implants in private clinics was 1.65 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.17-2.27]. This elevated SIR reflected increased incidence ratios for almost all major cancer sites; however, only for non-melanoma skin cancer was there an excess of more than 2 cases. No significant excess of cancer was observed among women who received implants in public hospitals (SIR = 1.10, 95% CI = 0.76-1.52) or among women attending the private clinics for other problems (SIR = 1.10, 95% CI = 0.78-1.52). The SIRs for breast cancer after breast implantation were 1.1 (95% CI = 0.5-2.2) among private clinic patients and 0.9 (95% CI = 0.4-1.7) among public hospital patients. The overall findings of these 2 implant cohorts and results from other investigations suggest that cancer risk is probably not increased among women receiving cosmetic breast implants. The inconsistent results for private clinics and public hospitals are likely related to selection bias and confounding among the private clinic patients, but our data did not permit exploration of these possibilities. Further research into the determinants of these inconsistencies is warranted.


Subject(s)
Breast Implantation , Breast Implants , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Cohort Studies , Confidence Intervals , Denmark/epidemiology , Female , Geography , Humans , Incidence , Melanoma/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Registries
3.
Pediatrics ; 102(5): 1112-5, 1998 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9794942

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To examine the occurrence of esophageal disorders, connective tissue diseases, and congenital malformations in children of mothers with breast implants. METHODS: Nationwide register-based follow-up study of all offspring born during 1977 to 1992 to a cohort of 1135 women with breast implants for cosmetic reasons and to a comparison cohort of 7071 women who underwent breast reduction surgery. Cause-specific hospi-talization rates among offspring, relative to those of the general population, were calculated from the Danish National Registry of Patients. RESULTS: Among the 939 children of mothers with breast implants, higher rates of esophageal disorders were observed, but the excess was similar for those born before versus after the implant surgery. Higher than expected hospitalization rates for these conditions were also observed among 3906 children of women who underwent breast reduction surgery. No significant increases in connective tissue diseases or congenital malformations were observed in either the breast implant or breast reduction cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: This first epidemiologic cohort study provides no evidence that silicone breast implants affect risks of esophageal or other disorders in children of the implantees. Rather, the observed risk pattern suggests that a lower threshold exists among both groups of women who have undergone cosmetic breast surgery in seeking professional medical care for problems normally solved outside the hospital.


Subject(s)
Breast Implants , Congenital Abnormalities/epidemiology , Esophageal Diseases/epidemiology , Rheumatic Diseases/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Denmark/epidemiology , Digestive System Abnormalities/epidemiology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Mothers , Registries
4.
Neurology ; 50(4): 951-5, 1998 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9566377

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the risk of neurologic disease among women with silicone breast implants. BACKGROUND: Since 1992, several case series reported an association between silicone breast implants and neurologic diseases. METHODS: Between 1977 and 1992, 1,135 women received cosmetic silicone breast implants, and 7,071 women had breast reduction surgery, as identified by the Danish National Register of Patients (NRP). NRP files provided information on numbers and types of subsequent neurologic disorders at hospital discharge, which were compared with expected numbers, calculated on the basis of national hospital discharge rates. RESULTS: In the two study cohorts, hospital discharge rates for neurologic diseases were raised by some 60% to 70% compared with Danish women in general. Among women with silicone breast implants, 13 subsequently developed a neurologic disorder compared with 7.7 expected; whereas in the comparison group, 63 observed versus 39.1 expected disorders were recorded. These results indicate that relative to the comparison cohort, women with implants had no excessive levels of definite neurologic disease. Furthermore, medical record reviews revealed that the majority of women with implants discharged with a neurologic diagnosis had either symptoms before implant surgery or neurologic symptoms secondary to degenerative diseases. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings do not support the hypothesis of silicone-induced neurologic disease. The reasons for the elevated rates of neurologic disease in both the exposed and comparison cohorts remain unclear, but may reflect selection processes associated with these women seeking medical care more often than the general population.


Subject(s)
Breast Implants/adverse effects , Nervous System Diseases/epidemiology , Nervous System Diseases/etiology , Adult , Breast/surgery , Cohort Studies , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Risk Factors , Silicones/adverse effects
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...