Estrogen- and progesterone receptors in normal cycling endometrium as studied by end-point titration.

A thorough knowledge of the normal physiological fluctuations in estrogen- (ER) and progesterone receptors (PgR) is essential to characterize the changes in ER and PgR in the abnormal endometrium. We investigated the distribution of ER and PgR in frozen human cycling endometrial tissue using the commercially available ER- and PgR-ICA kits. Two-fold end-point titration (EPT) of ER and PgR antibodies was implemented to semi-quantitate more accurately ER and PgR. Semiquantitation of ER and PgR using EPT was significantly correlated to results obtained using either simple scoring or enzyme-immunoassay (EIA) methods. ER and PgR staining fluctuated in relation to the menstrual cycle. In most subphases PgR exceeded ER in both epithelial and stromal cells. Highest levels of ER and PgR were demonstrated in the glands of the functionalis in mid-to-late proliferative phases, whereas both receptors were almost undetectable by immunohistology in the glands of mid-to-late secretory phases. Endometrial stromal cells had high and nearly constant EPT values for PgR, but low values for ER throughout the menstrual cycle. EPT values for ER and PgR were generally higher in the basalis than in the functionalis but showed similar cyclic fluctuations. Our results further substantiate the view that the response to hormonal stimulation is cell-type specific, and suggest differences in steroid metabolism according to cell type and layer.

Reproducibility of subjective immunohistochemical estrogen- and progesterone receptor determination in human endometrium.

To obtain a reliable scoring system for semi-quantitation of estrogen- (ER) and progesterone receptors (PgR) in human endometrial tissue, we investigated the reproducibility of subjective immunohistochemical ER and PgR determination. Specimens of frozen endometrial tissue were stained once (n = 129) or twice (n = 22) using the ER-ICA and PgR-ICA kits from Abbott. The semi-quantitative approach we used included subjective estimates of the overall staining intensity (I) and of the fraction of stained cells (%). Scoring was performed twice by the same observer and once by another observer (n = 87). Intra- and inter-observer agreement were evaluated using Kappa statistics. We found that more comprehensive scorings of I and % could not be agreed upon by the observers. Only simplified estimates of the fraction of cells stained and overall staining intensity were reproducible. Subjective estimates obtained by this method agreed with estimates obtained by counting (n = 38). Simplified H-scores, which were obtained by multiplication of the simplified estimates of % and I, were reproducible, too. In addition, semi-quantitation of ER and PgR by immunohistology was significantly correlated to quantitation by enzyme-immunoassay (n = 39). Thus, it was possible to reproducibly semi-quantitate ER and PgR only by employing a very simple immunohistochemical scoring of ER and PgR.